Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mcduffie@actcom.net: 62 ]

Total 62 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Making rotator loops separate (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 11:21:30 -0600
I've NEVER had a PL come loose on me, even the ones that weren't taped. I put them on as tight as my hands will do it without tools, and that's it. Properly installed, they shouldn't come loose with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00949.html (8,358 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Making rotator loops separate (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 13:03:37 -0600
Strong hands? Works for me, for 40 years no less. ;o) gm -- a g 0 n at a r r l dot n e t http colon slash slash mcduffie dot ws _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscompu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00957.html (8,761 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] 80M attic loop (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 16:17:46 -0600
Sheesh...what's the matter, Paul? Are you bored and thinking of starting a new career in arson? Even if fully insulated for high voltage, think of the rf you'll put into your home electronics and ele
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00067.html (7,236 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Air dielectric cable (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 12:54:56 -0600
I've never seen that done, but it might work for short runs. One of the neatest tricks I've seen over the years was at a station in Mark's area. The wave guide had the nitrogen tank on it to raise th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00212.html (9,093 bytes)

25. Re: {SPAM?:} [TowerTalk] Fw: Use this patch immediately ! (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 17:17:21 -0600
Microshaft never sends that kind of message. And they wouldn't call you friend. Flush it with the rest of the brown that comes in via the spam pipe. gm -- a g 0 n at a r r l dot n e t http colon slas
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00272.html (7,960 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Brake click on HAM IV rotor (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 13:49:41 -0600
Unless it is a special solenoid, NO! Most solenoids of this type have a limit to how long they can be engaged. They will overheat and burn up. gm -- a g 0 n at a r r l dot n e t http colon slash slas
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00427.html (8,134 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] "super" KT36XA (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:13:44 -0600
Correction. The XA added 2 elements, one for 10 meter mono and one tri-band element. The four back elements of the XA are the original A model and an extra 16 foot boom and two elements were added to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00553.html (8,031 bytes)

28. [TowerTalk] OT ID an Antenna (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:54:18 -0600
A little off topic, but I'm trying to help someone who wrote asking the identity of this antenna. If you recognize this, drop me a line. Thanks. http://actcom.net/~mcduffie/trap/trap.htm Gary -- a g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00647.html (6,916 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Refurbishing Tower Sections (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:01:38 -0600
You can't really compare cold galvanizing to the real thing. It's well worth getting it done right. gm -- a g 0 n at a r r l dot n e t http colon slash slash mcduffie dot ws _________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00681.html (8,479 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommended FRS radios for tower work (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 07:24:52 -0600
I'm finding more and more professional tower crews are using FRS. After all, they are $25 each for the better Motorola radios and the batteries last all day and then some. I'd go for the ones with se
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00049.html (8,571 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Running coax into the basement (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:35:26 -0600
You misunderstood. Figure out what you need and then DOUBLE it! N -- a g 0 n at a r r l dot n e t http colon slash slash mcduffie dot ws _______________________________________________ See: http://ww
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00229.html (8,629 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Newbie (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:00:03 -0600
Bill is spot-on with this. Unless you've already been on the air for several years, you have no idea what you will settle into and enjoy doing. Too many people are trying to start at the top (in all
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00245.html (8,121 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Posting replies BACK to the group... (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:32:42 -0600
This topic has come up before and there's always a 'fight' about it. I'll take the opportunity to express my opinion again, just as others will. Absolutely. That's what lists and newsgroups are for.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00565.html (9,374 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning, surge protection (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 07:21:25 -0700
I haven't been monitoring this thread, so I don't know if this has been brought up before or not. You can buy whole house protectors at your local electrical supply for $35. It is a three wire device
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00203.html (8,983 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Interference questions dog broadband over power lines- twirp blames hams for BPL shortcomings (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 10:49:21 -0700
They didn't "merely report the two sides of the argument". They set the tone of the issue for the reader. The article is clearly one sided in its tone. It left out many facts and didn't explain that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00143.html (9,410 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] grounding (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:38:27 -0700
This is the normal situation at a broadcast facility. The important thing to do is provide a path around the house wiring, directly to your ground system. At the power entrance to the house, the util
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00359.html (10,003 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] Certification to climb towers? (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 17:29:02 -0700
As Phil said, I seriously doubt OSHA has any authority over private parties. If you're in the business, I could see it coming to that. However, I also had someone tell me that anyone climbing had to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00150.html (8,344 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding Rod Lenght (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:18:29 -0700
That's why we insist on bonding the phone company (and power provider) grounds to ours before they come into the building. Before doing that, we had lots of trouble with lightning coming in through t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00250.html (8,514 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] static cat (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 09:20:15 -0700
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I think that's the key. Their web page is misleading, but, in my own belief, not entirely wrong. Yes, there will be direct strikes to the tower, even the whiskers. But before the di
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00382.html (9,347 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] Static grounding protection-experience (score: 1)
Author: mcduffie@actcom.net
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 17:53:27 -0700
The model rockets actually trailed a fine wire that remained grounded as the rocket rose, allowing the conductor to go right toward the source. Gary -- ag0n at arrl dot net http colon slash slash gar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00402.html (8,132 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu