Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mcduffie@actcom.net: 62 ]

Total 62 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL: Presidential Backing (score: 1)
Author: "Gary McDuffie, Sr." <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:39:33 -0600
Yes. I was thinking the same thing as he spoke. He was obviously thinking of BPL. Yet another reason.... N -- ag0n at arrl dot net http colon slash slash garymcduffie dot com ________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00493.html (8,030 bytes)

42. Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259, good ones vs. bad ones (score: 1)
Author: "Gary McDuffie, Sr." <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:59:38 -0600
I was about to ask the same question. I generally don't buy connectors without being able to hold them in my hand first, but I need to place an order for some upcoming projects. I've seen so-called s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00706.html (9,131 bytes)

43. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna FS measurements (score: 1)
Author: "Gary McDuffie, Sr." <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:38:46 -0600
Also, since most receiver AGCs are not linear, they respond to a db of change quicker at some areas of the meter than others. Some experimentation to show at what level the receiver is most sensitive
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00691.html (8,320 bytes)

44. Re: [TowerTalk] [Fwd: BPL Comments] (score: 1)
Author: "Gary McDuffie, Sr." <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 10:33:52 -0600
Would it be possible to have this posted without all the garbage in it so that proper paragraph breakage can be read without having to decrypt it? What was posted is extremely hard to read, especiall
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00032.html (8,162 bytes)

45. Re: [TowerTalk] [Fwd: BPL Comments] (score: 1)
Author: "Gary McDuffie, Sr." <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:26:33 -0600
THANKS! These are remarkable comments, coming from someone so young. Very well done. g1 -- ag0n at arrl dot net http colon slash slash garymcduffie dot com ___________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00038.html (8,457 bytes)

46. Re: [TowerTalk] Hygain Hy-tower on 160 & 80 (score: 1)
Author: "Gary McDuffie, Sr." <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 09:41:12 -0600
First, you need to check your word wrap in your mail program. It seems to be turned off. I'd be interested in what you come up with on this problem. I haven't had time to troubleshoot it, but mine do
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00333.html (7,979 bytes)

47. Re: [TowerTalk] kt34a Manual (score: 1)
Author: "Gary McDuffie, Sr." <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 11:50:27 -0600
I made the same conversion you are talking about on mine several years ago. The XA is supported by 4 sections of 3 inch by 8 foot material, end to end to make the 32 foot boom. It is supported by a P
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00360.html (8,161 bytes)

48. Re: [TowerTalk] Replying to the list...AGAIN! (score: 1)
Author: "Gary McDuffie, Sr." <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:55:15 -0600
I've always figured that the question was asked here, and should be answered here. My replies all are via the reply command and I quickly wipe out the personal address and replace it with tt, which i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00535.html (9,075 bytes)

49. Re: [TowerTalk] Replying to the list...AGAIN! (score: 1)
Author: "Gary McDuffie, Sr." <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 14:29:33 -0600
And I strongly disagree with you. Like you, I had/have no interest in the aluminum tubing thread and deleted each one as they came in, still am. I just checked and don't see any blood on me anywhere.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00540.html (8,279 bytes)

50. Re: [TowerTalk] Replying to the list...AGAIN! (score: 1)
Author: "Gary McDuffie, Sr." <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:49:31 -0600
This grouchy olden farte agrees with you. The key point, I think, is that the archives are useless if they only refer to the question and never show answers. A topic I'm not interested in today, may
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00547.html (8,352 bytes)

51. Re: [TowerTalk] Replying to the list...AGAIN! (score: 1)
Author: G1 <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 14:47:50 -0600
Careful. I AM one who prefers replies to the list, but I know that this subject has come up MANY times in the past and you just aren't hearing much from the people who want it the way it is. Don't as
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00570.html (10,047 bytes)

52. Re: [TowerTalk] Ignitor for Cadwelds (score: 1)
Author: G1 <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:35:13 -0600
I'm sure some will disagree, but I would feel safe with a torch too, if only it worked! Lacking a proper striker when I did my first one, I attempted everything I could think of, including the torch.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00697.html (8,241 bytes)

53. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardline from obsolete analog cellular sites (?) (score: 1)
Author: Gary <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:12:40 -0600
What are the mandates? I haven't heard what is going on in that industry. I can tell you that if analog goes away around my area, there won't be any cell phone coverage to speak of. The way it is now
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00756.html (8,747 bytes)

54. Re: [TowerTalk] Cell coverage (score: 1)
Author: Gary <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:00:02 -0600
You got that right. The cell company loaned me a digital phone for a month to see how it worked. The state wanted me to go digital. As soon as I left town, it was useless, unless I was sitting near o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00759.html (8,042 bytes)

55. Re: [TowerTalk] Wanted : 60' Plus Free Standing Tower (score: 1)
Author: Gary <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:13:58 -0600
Heard you the first time! -- ag0n at arrl dot net http colon slash slash garymcduffie dot com _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00769.html (7,425 bytes)

56. Re: [TowerTalk] non-hams on Towertalk (score: 1)
Author: Gary <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:35:17 -0600
What makes you think so? Some do, some don't. I rarely do, unless I'm trying to get a point across. Gary -- ag0n at arrl dot net http colon slash slash garymcduffie dot com __________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00555.html (7,427 bytes)

57. Re: [TowerTalk] non-hams on Towertalk (score: 1)
Author: Gary <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:57:49 -0600
As I said 'offline' to the same question, I have no problem with it, but I don't happen to choose to sign my call unless it serves a specific purpose. My call appears on some of my posts, depending o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00561.html (8,250 bytes)

58. Re: Fwd: [TowerTalk] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Gary <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:22:09 -0600
Wow...I wonder if this is a type-specific problem. I've stood in the middle of a hilltop with 7 of them on it and they don't make much noise at all. Gary -- ag0n at arrl dot net http colon slash slas
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00240.html (7,613 bytes)

59. Re: [TowerTalk] Night Climb (score: 1)
Author: Gary <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 07:54:05 -0600
I'm not sure why you would go to all the trouble of dragging a cord up the tower for light these days. Wal-Mart has several different types of LED head-band lights for under $20 now. I bought two dif
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00387.html (8,129 bytes)

60. Re: [TowerTalk] connector pl 259 (score: 1)
Author: Gary <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 07:37:36 -0700
I may be wrong, but I was under the impression that he wanted a connector, not an adapter. gm -- ag0n at arrl dot net http colon slash slash garymcduffie dot com _____________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00244.html (8,156 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu