Mail Archive Search: <+from:mcduffie@scottsbluff.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:mcduffie@scottsbluff.net: 95 ]

Total 95 documents matching your query.

81. [TowerTalk] Tower windload with trees blocking (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 22:21:01 -0600; Before someone else points it out, obviously, I meant the WIND, not the LOAD, would be equally applied to the tower in the following statement. Gary -- -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towert; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00282.html (7,776 bytes)
82. [TowerTalk] Retuning TH-7DX (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 08:53:41 -0600; Good point. No, I haven't done that yet, but will. No. The installation was clean. The only thing around it was a tv antenna, over 10 feet above (see picture on the web page). On the good news front; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00303.html (8,227 bytes)
83. [TowerTalk] Lightning protection grounding (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 09:11:04 -0600; But this wouldn't be considered a good bonded ground. I realize there is lots of downward force on it, but technically there is no good electrical connection. I had marked this thread to follow, sinc; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00307.html (9,100 bytes)
84. [TowerTalk] Retuning TH-7DX (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 07:04:29 -0600; My apologies for this being so short. I received several good responses to this question and Roger Cox did put out a DX setting. There is also a CW setting. I'll post a digest in a few days. I have a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00341.html (7,795 bytes)
85. [TowerTalk] Retuning TH-7DX (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 10:37:30 -0600; Well, I promised a digest, but now that I have had time to catch up on the list, I see most of it has been posted by others. I won't duplicate everything, but will say Roger Cox had recommended two "; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00370.html (9,544 bytes)
86. [TowerTalk] Ground Rods (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 21:19:11 -0600; I know what GEM is, but what is coke breeze? Gary -- -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contes; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00410.html (8,816 bytes)
87. [TowerTalk] Rotor in sidemount (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 22:16:17 -0600; I was wondering why not just let it do the bump. That way, if the wind turned the mast in the rotor or boom/mast clamp, you could run it up against the tower and straighten it back out again. ;o) Tha; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00528.html (7,868 bytes)
88. [TowerTalk] Plumbing a 100' 45G (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 11:24:31 -0700; Is there such a place that the wind doesn't blow to make this impossible? Certainly no place I've lived! Gary - AGØN mcduffie@scottsbluff.net -- -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towert; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00111.html (7,960 bytes)
89. [TowerTalk] Help with beam rotation (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 17:57:27 -0700; That doesn't seem to make much sense. If it is folded back on itself, what is to keep the two smooth surfaces from slipping? It should just roll out. Just asking. Gary - AGØN mcduffie@scottsbl; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00147.html (8,346 bytes)
90. [TowerTalk] Nonconductive guys/fixed side mount (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 10:57:55 -0700; Two questions come to mind. With the boom-to-mast clamp rotated 90 degrees from the norm, will it still have enough clamping grip to keep the boom from tilting up and down (as opposed to sideways twi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00253.html (8,838 bytes)
91. [TowerTalk] Missing posts (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 08:20:25 -0700; Now that I think of it, I've posted at least one recently that didn't make it to the list also. Gary - AGØN mcduffie@scottsbluff.net -- -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.ht; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00353.html (6,865 bytes)
92. [TowerTalk] Ground Rod Under Tower Base (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 15:45:37 -0700; of your tower base hole before the base is installed, is a good way to go. What is the thinking on this? Is it an old wives tale, or is this something that really does improve the ground system. My; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00371.html (8,740 bytes)
93. [TowerTalk] Ground Rod Under Tower Base (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 21:56:35 -0700; It would appear that I was not clear enough about a major fact. There would be no ground conductor WITHIN the concrete base. The rod would be UNDER the base, and the wire OUTSIDE of the concrete base; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00383.html (8,530 bytes)
94. [TowerTalk] Gin Pole Strength (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 17:25:33 -0700; How so? The gin pole will still be handling the same amount of weight. The "operator" will have less load, but not the gin pole. Gary McDuffie - AGØN -- -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.co; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00433.html (7,813 bytes)
95. [TowerTalk] Re: (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 08:27:32 -0700; I bought a spool of it at a hamfest several years ago, but haven't seen it advertised anywhere. It is green, as you say, and new condition. Check your local fests. Gary -- -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.c; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00495.html (7,721 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 95
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]