Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mike@n0hi.net: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Do We ever need this? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike N0HI" <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:26:16 -0600
I have to believe this is fancy English. I can't imagine they expect every single entrant to be making announcements prior to the contest. Sounds like disclaimer language to me. -- Mike DeChristopher
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00157.html (11,838 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Operation Announcement - Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: "Mike N0HI" <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:52:51 -0600
I am not entirely sure that seeing hundreds of announcements on this reflector would be a good thing. If this "rule" is true, there should be another list devoted to it; otherwise, I can see this jus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00160.html (9,816 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] More Q codes for contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Mike N0HI" <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:52:42 -0600
WAE will be awful. QTC, QPC, QSM, QRG... Have to start writing these down again! -- Mike DeChristopher, N0HI http://www.n0hi.net telnet://cluster.n0hi.net QPC? am I spotted on the packet cluster? QPC
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00391.html (7,903 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Backwards thinking in log checking (score: 1)
Author: "Mike N0HI" <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:17:17 -0700
I remember N3FJP's program used to yell "DUPE" out the speakers and prevent you from logging one. I'm not sure if this has been changed in more recent versions. Worked a station during SSB who said I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00070.html (16,205 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings... (score: 1)
Author: "Mike N0HI" <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:44:07 -0700
I thought I heard evidence of quite a few code readers in this one. "HI" (.... ..) sounds like HI to the human ear pretty easily, but the code readers all want to hear "SS" (... ...). Worked a few wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00201.html (9,253 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] How unethical is this? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike N0HI" <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:39:01 -0700
What you suggest might be unethical in some situations, but I think getting new or otherwise inactive hams on the air balances out the equation. If you are angling for a top spot, you could bring you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00309.html (12,210 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] the "new" M/S for WPX (score: 1)
Author: "Mike N0HI" <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:10:07 -0500 (EST)
It is also a wonderful category for people who cannot afford or do not have the space for a second transmitter, filters, antennas, and other associated hardware. It is also a wonderful category for p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00351.html (7,812 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] the "new" M/S for WPX (score: 1)
Author: "Mike N0HI" <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:11:55 -0500 (EST)
No, I don't see this changing participation -- and that is good. You are correct, a m/m or m/2 station can still knock down and interlock for a m/s. I'm sure they will. I also believe at least a few
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00370.html (12,910 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX M/S Rule (score: 1)
Author: Mike N0HI <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:29:13 -0500
Guys, I'm thankful that Randy gives us a say at all. Technically, he doesn't have to. -- Mike DeChristopher, N0HI http://www.n0hi.net telnet://cluster.n0hi.net _______________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00578.html (10,634 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] anti-contest petition MMSN (score: 1)
Author: Mike N0HI <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:43:15 -0500
Similarly, the local guys had a SET locally here a few years back. The frequency they had selected for coordination was 146.52 (you know...the calling frequency). The day of the SET came, and they fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00050.html (11,148 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1)
Author: Mike N0HI <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:55:31 -0400
I am disappointed the rule read "progressive." "Sequential" would have been a lot more fun... Fibonacci sequence would be a sequential number (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8). In fact, the 20th Q made would be # 6
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00206.html (9,340 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Foot switch recommendations (score: 1)
Author: Mike N0HI <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:38:14 -0400
I bought a bunch of $8 music-shop keyboard foot pedals. They have 1/4" plugs and work just as well as any "ham-specific" pedal would. When they stop working, at $8, I won't be too upset. -- Mike DeCh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00342.html (8,890 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Foot switch recommendations (score: 1)
Author: Mike N0HI <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:06:19 -0400
Generic cheap-o brand. The way I see it, if a rotor breaks or a radio breaks or a computer cracks up during a contest, you have a problem. If the footswitch goes, you're probably going to be fine. Es
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00369.html (9,850 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where are Big M/M from USA? (score: 1)
Author: Mike N0HI <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:53:20 -0400
Most of the US guys find a club call to use, or just use an operator's with a "funky" prefix since there are so many of us W1, K1, AA1, etc. Don't know about K3LR or KC1XX, but I was at K1TTT's with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00016.html (7,526 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Mike N0HI <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 15:12:25 -0400
As a younger operator, I can tell you with 100% certainty and without a sliver of doubt that if we were all using paper logs and footwarmers, we would have even less attention from the younger crowd.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00206.html (13,904 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] In-state stations in QSO Parties... (score: 1)
Author: "Mike N0HI" <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:13:06 -0400
FL QP is different in that an out of state station can actually run FL stations to rate. I was doing this on Sunday when NQ4I called me, gave me 5nn GA, I gave him 5nn MA, and we both probably realiz
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00393.html (12,658 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Field Day (score: 1)
Author: "Mike N0HI" <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:38:39 -0400
Last year at W1NY I had a second computer connected to my node back at home. It was on the second screen, so it didn't interface with the logging program but was helpful once in a while for a "rare"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00121.html (10,808 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] public logs (there are no secrets) (score: 1)
Author: "Mike N0HI" <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:45:54 -0400
I look at it like this: Once submitted, my logs become the property of the contest sponsor. They may do with them as they please. If they make the logs public, so be it. The moment I disagree with th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00257.html (12,279 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Wow....is there a new manager at the Crowne Plaza??? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike DeChristopher" <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 11:23:23 -0400
I'm in sales for a large hotel chain. Trust me, if it were my hotel, I'd be up around $200/night also. My advice would be to book a room block and negotiate a lower rate. They probably won't block ro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00031.html (10,606 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Wow....is there a new manager at the Crowne Plaza??? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike DeChristopher" <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 13:38:00 -0400
Agreed. That price is crazy. But they will sell out at it, there is no question in my mind. Or they'll adjust rate as they get closer to the event (even if they aren't full the first day, they'll fil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00036.html (12,644 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu