Mail Archive Search: <+from:montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM>

Results:

References: [ +from:montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. 160 Score (score: 1): Author: montaguj@ccmsmtp.StPaul.NCR.com (John Montague); Date: Mon Feb 1 14:35:31 1993; Ice Storm => 0 Antenna => 0Q, 0S, 0S = 0 Score Sigh W0RUE; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00009.html (5,995 bytes)
2. 24 Hour Contests (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Thu Feb 25 06:19:24 1993; There is merit in both 24 & 48 hour contests. In fact, a 24 Contiguous Hour catagory in a 48 hour contest makes good sense. I would recommend that to compete in a 24 Hour class that there must be no; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00171.html (7,691 bytes)
3. Contest alternatives (24 Hr, pins, ???) (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Thu Mar 4 13:20:35 1993; It is important that we recognize clearly that contesting as we are discussing it is by definition an Amateur activity! Even so, a contest is a product that is "bought" (engaged in; invested in; part; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00047.html (9,073 bytes)
4. ARRL e-mail (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Tue Mar 16 13:48:24 1993; Internet mail has a significant weakness - there is no assured delivery. Unfortunately, even if you know for sure that you used the right address, you can not be sure that anything was received unle; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00209.html (7,848 bytes)
5. Little Billy, 9 Holes, and World Peace (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Fri Mar 19 09:27:13 1993; .. (Much deleted in respect for those who pay to receive e-mail) .. (ditto) Right on Todd! We might even carry the analogy further to say that abandoning courtesy and other ethical behavior during co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00243.html (7,336 bytes)
6. Stacked Arrays (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Mon Mar 22 12:17:53 1993; Interesting. Question: If the output power of each Amp is at the legal limit, is the above configuration legal? I think not. The correct answer is? ______________________ John W0RUE; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00271.html (6,541 bytes)
7. Multiple Amplifiers (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Tue Mar 23 10:30:01 1993; There was either an interpretation of Part 97 (perhaps just a proposal, I don't remember which) that clarified the power limit definition (intent) -- it read something like this: The aggregate RF pow; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00284.html (10,500 bytes)
8. 24 hrs & multiple amps (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Thu Mar 25 09:43:09 1993; Note the units -- it is 48 amp-hours, not to be confused with Ampere-hours or anything else with a real-world meaning. John W0RUE; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00292.html (6,398 bytes)
9. Sweepstakes Log Checking (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Fri Mar 26 12:57:12 1993; Agree with consistency as a requirement for equitable treatment. Someone else asked what the algorithm is for "Busted" call determination; I too would like to know for I can think of many circumstan; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00311.html (10,092 bytes)
10. SOA Limited (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Mon Apr 5 13:16:19 1993; Alternate wording: Operating periods, after the first 8 hour period, extend for a minimum of two hours from the ON time. Time-out periods must be at least 30 minutes long. This makes it clear that "; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00026.html (6,651 bytes)
11. 24-hr proposals (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Wed Apr 7 10:47:18 1993; It is interesting to see the prime elements behind a 'contiguous 24 Hr' catagory come back in Eric's proposal. It seems like a rather complicated, but more flexable, way to accomplish the same end. T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00037.html (7,637 bytes)
12. open radio architecture (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Wed Apr 7 18:43:58 1993; How can anyone use "architecture" and "IBM-compatable PC" in the same paragraph without getting violently ill? Kidding aside, don't use the IBM-compatable PC as an example of something that has an a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00048.html (8,172 bytes)
13. Am I missing something? (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Wed Apr 7 19:17:38 1993; Contests, like all Amateur Radio activities, should first of all be personally rewarding, i.e., fun. Second, they should do something to satisfy the only root rationale for allocating radio spectrum; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00050.html (8,919 bytes)
14. The Morality Issue (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Fri Apr 30 10:57:36 1993; Or the repeat & blatant offender! -- John W0RUE; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00190.html (6,109 bytes)
15. Morality Issue (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Fri Apr 30 10:57:41 1993; To quote a Ford executive speaking on Quality: If you always do what you always did You'll always get what you always got Can you afford to have more of what you already have? We can't afford the lac; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00193.html (6,292 bytes)
16. New Sprint :-) (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Wed May 5 11:15:39 1993; My e-mail leaves the "operating position" at 16 Megabit, leaves the building at 1.544 Megabit. Do Internet contacts count in this new contest. Can I get credit for two bands at the same time? 8-); /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00027.html (6,204 bytes)
17. Handicapping (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Fri Jun 4 17:43:40 1993; Handicapping tends to yield "equal outcome," I much prefer "equal opportunity!" John, W0RUE; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00014.html (5,929 bytes)
18. Cat1-4 Ideas -- a small refinement (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Fri Jun 11 10:53:46 1993; I like the Grid Square ideas that have been floated. The best, in my opinion, is to include the grid square in all contest exchanges (preferably the six character grid square -- four character grid s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00065.html (8,601 bytes)
19. Computer op, unassisted (score: 1): Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague); Date: Fri Jul 30 10:34:09 1993; An artifical Op engaged in an artificial Competition from an artificial station should use an artificial call?? :-) Or, maybe just sign ".../B1T" ;-) 73, John -- W0RUE; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-07/msg00241.html (6,654 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]