Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mtnredhed@gmail.com: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] trying to ID an antenna design I saw but didn't bookmark (score: 1)
Author: jim feldman <mtnredhed@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:06:36 -0700
Please bear with me on this one. I saw an antenna design about 6 months ago, but didn't bookmark it because I was searching for something else. Hopefully I can describe it well enough that someone wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00389.html (8,252 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] who's "right" (a tuner question) (score: 1)
Author: jim feldman <mtnredhed@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:30:55 -0800
The cast of players: Kenwood TS-940, Heath SA 2060 ant. tuner, MFJ 259. I was trying to use the MFJ to create a table of settings for the tuner. Just wasn't working (never could find a SWR much lower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00147.html (7,928 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] who's "right" (a tuner question) (score: 1)
Author: jim feldman <mtnredhed@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:36:55 -0800
I can't completely rule that out. I can say that I didn't have any trouble setting up the traps and tuning the vertical. I got dips while tuning the tuner, just not very deep ones. There's a AM BCB s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00152.html (8,361 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] who's "right" (a tuner question) (score: 1)
Author: jim feldman <mtnredhed@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 17:09:34 -0800
It took me a little while to understand how a strong BCB station might do this, but I assume it's because the MFJ "sees" the signal as reflected power? I didn't (and don't) see that if I plug right i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00158.html (8,613 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] who's "right" (a tuner question) (score: 1)
Author: jim feldman <mtnredhed@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:45:12 -0800
ok, a little more testing. I set up on 7.230. I tuned via the noise peak and then used low power to dial in. Both the TS-940 and the meter on the antenna tuner agreed the match was at or near 1:1. Ne
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00159.html (10,239 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] who's "right" (a tuner question) (score: 1)
Author: jim feldman <mtnredhed@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:23:37 -0800
jim w6jmf _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00172.html (8,614 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Probably stupid coax question (score: 1)
Author: jim feldman <mtnredhed@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:26:37 -0700
I was helping another ham put connectors on some jumpers he wanted made up. The jumpers were an interesting cable that appeared to have a semi air dielectric and a very hefty center conductor made fr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-06/msg00181.html (7,741 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Probably stupid coax question (score: 1)
Author: jim feldman <mtnredhed@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:04:22 -0700
okay, I'll give em a try. Just put in an order @ Allied electronics. I went to amphenol's site, and their drawing shows an .125" ID for the pin, but oddly doesn't show the OD. The ones I have might b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-06/msg00188.html (8,129 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Plywood mast (score: 1)
Author: mtnredhed <mtnredhed@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 09:32:53 -0700
Our club has been given a sectional mast system that appears to have been DoD at one point. The sections are about 8ft in length, tapering, and made of plywood. That is, multiple glued layers that cr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00345.html (7,074 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu