Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n2icarrl@gmail.com: 536 ]

Total 536 documents matching your query.

201. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Re: The Elephant In The Bedroom (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:41:10 -0600
Ron, Read the WRTC selection criteria for North American stations at www.wrtc2014.org/team-selection. Pay particular attention to the North American team selection areas. North America has been divid
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00105.html (12,630 bytes)

202. [CQ-Contest] Unintended Consequences (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:42:59 -0600
For those of you who are game to change the rules and scoring of existing contests, I would like to remind you of the law of unintended consequences. The recent IARU HF contest is a perfect example.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00127.html (7,730 bytes)

203. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX & Activity (Was: Intended consequences) (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:53:03 -0600
By that logic, you would advocate the following changes: - Change CQWW CW and SSB rules so same-country North Americans QSO's count for 2 points. - Change ARRL DX to world-works-world. 2 points per Q
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00194.html (9,663 bytes)

204. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX & activity (Was: intended consequences) (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:15:58 -0600
When was the Florida QSO Party before the Dayton hamvention vacated the last-weekend-in-April slot ? Why not a combined GA-FL QSO Party the 2nd weekend of April ? 73, Steve, N2IC ____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00202.html (9,891 bytes)

205. Re: [CQ-Contest] Combining Contests (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:42:28 -0600
Kudos for this feature go to N1MM Logger team member K3CT. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00223.html (6,995 bytes)

206. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi-op rule change in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:21:02 -0600
I agree with Juha. There are really two rule changes here: 1) Must have a transmit interlock when two (or more) radios on same band. Completely unenforceable. 2) No alternating CQ's on the same band.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00137.html (8,357 bytes)

207. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi-op rule change in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:17:59 -0600
Yes, CQWW already had such a rule. And since CQWW already had the rule, why should CQWW specify the method of compliance ? No it's not up to them. It must be hardware or software. Human lockout (usin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00138.html (9,176 bytes)

208. Re: [CQ-Contest] Kenwood TS-590S Contesting performance question (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:44:41 -0600
I have had a pair of TS-590's since July, and have used them very successfully in the IARU, NAQP CW, and NA Sprint. I'll mostly concur with Filipe, but with a few comments: - Turning off the PREamp o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00290.html (11,182 bytes)

209. Re: [CQ-Contest] End of contest and rewriting log (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 06:48:09 -0600
Here's a very good article on the ARRL web site which addresses this and many other contesting ethics questions: http://www.arrl.org/hf-operating-guidelines 73, Steve, N2IC __________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00323.html (10,422 bytes)

210. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:09:11 -0600
Even that isn't enough. When EF8M posted a YouTube of their operation a few years ago, there were several "accidental" shots of their WaveNode wattmeters in action. One shot showed power being split
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00142.html (10,578 bytes)

211. Re: [CQ-Contest] How Blatant Can You Get? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:41:04 -0600
Gee, Bob, I know the USA is #1 in everything else, but the USA doesn't mandate the ham radio power limit worldwide. In fact, some countries do not even explicitly specify an amateur radio power limit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00175.html (8,664 bytes)

212. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB : How were condx ? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:29:04 -0700
Hi Yan, This seems very strange. Here are some QSO's from my log showing stations worked on 15 meters from your area: QSO: 21201 PH 2012-03-03 0006 N2IC 59 NM YB1AR 59 500 QSO: 21201 PH 2012-03-03 00
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00027.html (11,398 bytes)

213. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB (CQ WPX) : How were condx ? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:37:14 -0600
Hi Yan, Some comments below. 73, Steve, N2IC The usual short path opening from western NA to SE Asia. The Moxon has some serious interaction with other antennas or metallic objects when pointed in th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00211.html (10,796 bytes)

214. [CQ-Contest] FCC Seeks Comments on Impediments to Amateur Radio Communications (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 10:41:53 -0600
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/index.do?document=313370 Before you roll your eyes, wondering what this has to do with contesting, see Question 2 on Page 3: a. What private land use restriction
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00035.html (8,254 bytes)

215. Re: [CQ-Contest] [AOCC] FCC Seeks Comments on Impediments to AmateurRadioCommunications (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:05:05 -0600
For ? Against ? This is not a notice of rulemaking. It's a request for comments on a number of open-ended questions. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00036.html (8,732 bytes)

216. Re: [CQ-Contest] Could Advertising Return Full Contest Score Listings to QST? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:25:48 -0600
Full line scores for all ARRL contests are already available on-line. No need to wait for the digital edition. Go to http://www.arrl.org/contest-results-articles , select your favorite contest, and s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00189.html (9,083 bytes)

217. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:00:00 -0600
If they use a different --transmitter-- and a different --call-- and it's a different --operator-- then it is allowed. This is exactly how PVRC and NCCC rack up those big club aggregate scores in Swe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00231.html (11,945 bytes)

218. Re: [CQ-Contest] Life of Coax (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 07:05:54 -0600
Measure it, and compare with the original specs. See August, 2012 QST, page 44. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00365.html (8,566 bytes)

219. Re: [CQ-Contest] Do I need to operate assisted to figure out the calls? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:39:09 -0600
My solution to this problem is simple. I call them. If I'm a dupe, it wastes their time, too. Good. I work them, and ask for their call. If they give their call, and it's a dupe, it wastes their time
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00396.html (8,754 bytes)

220. Re: [CQ-Contest] New CQ WW DX Rule Bans Post-Contest Log Changes (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 07:36:31 -0600
N1MM Logger has several "features" that could be misused for post-contest log scrubbing. As a member of the development team, I made a change a few years ago to not allow those features to be used un
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00005.html (9,798 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu