Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n2mg@contesting.com: 129 ]

Total 129 documents matching your query.

61. [TowerTalk] T2X Overhaul (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 30 Aug 2001 19:42:17 -0700
There's a pun in there somewhere... ________________________________________________ PeoplePC: It's for people. And it's just smart. http://www.peoplepc.com List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wireless
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00716.html (7,355 bytes)

62. [TowerTalk] PVC and UV (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 30 Aug 2001 19:50:46 -0700
Why is this so? Black, by its nature, is a highly absorbing color for visible light of all wavelengths. And depending on the paint, it likely does a commendable job of absorbing in the UV as well. Pe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00717.html (8,092 bytes)

63. [TowerTalk] Routing cables - tower to shack (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 20 Jul 2001 17:29:46 -0700
If the proposed coax entry point is "far" away (say 40 feet around the perimeter of the house) from the utility ground, what's the best thing to do? Mine will be like this - FWIW, the coax will pass
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00344.html (9,524 bytes)

64. [TowerTalk] Re: US Towers 472 coax question (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 24 Jul 2001 10:35:12 -0700
I feel it necessary to say that I DID tie off my coax at each coax arm on my former crank-up (72 footer, 4 sections). It's not rocket science to get it right. Each arm had a small coax loop to allow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00460.html (10,473 bytes)

65. [TowerTalk] Painting antennas, need advice (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 27 Jul 2001 04:45:21 -0700
This situation prompted one of my answer choices at http://www.eham.net/survey/ ;-) 73 Mike N2MG webmaster@eham.net ________________________________________________ PeoplePC: It's for people. And it'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00540.html (8,691 bytes)

66. [TowerTalk] Painting antennas, need advice (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 27 Jul 2001 05:20:41 -0700
Technical answer: It probably won't take very long for the aluminum to get that nice, dull look, and become less visible (without paint) all on its own. Political answer: Painting it a dull color rig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00541.html (10,787 bytes)

67. [TowerTalk] Re: T2X repairs (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 27 Jul 2001 09:09:02 -0700
Bruce, Check out the Reviews (Repair Service) on http://www.eham.net 73 Mike N2MG webmaster@eham.net Sunny Sun Lakes, Arizona ________________________________________________ PeoplePC: It's for peopl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00546.html (7,159 bytes)

68. [TowerTalk] finding resonant frequency of a shunt-fed towerfor 160 (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 31 Jul 2001 06:27:13 -0700
The ARRL is selling the complete set of Ham Radio Magazine on CD-ROM for $60. http://www.arrl.org/catalog/?category=CD-ROMs&words=HRCD 73 Mike N2MG ________________________________________________ Pe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00682.html (8,878 bytes)

69. Fwd: RE: [TowerTalk] finding resonant frequency of a shunt-fedtower for 160 (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 31 Jul 2001 06:30:11 -0700
Oops, that's $150 for the COMPLETE set. $60 is for aproximately 6 year's worth. Mea culpa. N2MG -- Start of forwarded message -- Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] finding resonant frequency of a shunt-fed tow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00683.html (9,504 bytes)

70. [TowerTalk] Uncoiling CATV hardline (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 31 Jul 2001 13:23:46 -0700
Is there a good way to uncoil CATV (or other) hardline in a manner that will produce a relatively straight, un-kinked and bump-free line? I can imagine "simply" uncoiling it slowly along the ground i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00688.html (7,779 bytes)

71. [TowerTalk] Pier pin vs. burying in concrete (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 1 Jun 2001 12:26:16 -0700
<< First, they use a flat bottom plate on the concrete. I doubt that these rotate at all to relieve the moment at the bottom.>> "The wide footprint on the pier may allow the tower to rotate about the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00025.html (10,421 bytes)

72. [TowerTalk] Guy rod stress (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 1 Jun 2001 12:33:56 -0700
Part of a recent thread referred to wanting the ability to change a guyed tower's height at some date after initial construction. While a noble goal to plan ahead, I wonder what kind of added stress
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00026.html (7,453 bytes)

73. [TowerTalk] Rebar (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 4 Jun 2001 05:06:13 -0700
I read here often that folks recommend that rebar be kept "inside" the concrete (and by several inches) - away from the nasty, wet soil in an effort to protect it from rust. My situation (high water
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00051.html (7,656 bytes)

74. [TowerTalk] Treating aluminum (was New Source for Yagi Ubolts) (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 4 Jun 2001 18:39:20 -0700
Anodizing is unfortunately non-conductive. Some other anti-corrosive treatments for aluminum retain conductivity such as iridite/alodine. If I recall, these aren't as durable. Some details: http://ww
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00059.html (7,831 bytes)

75. [TowerTalk] Guy wire resonance (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 6 Jun 2001 06:07:39 -0700
A topic currently near to my heart (and wallet). I'd like to see the numbers for your 75 foot R45 tower. For a tower of ~120 feet (for which I'm in the throes of constructing) the numbers show that P
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00069.html (9,792 bytes)

76. [TowerTalk] Earth Anchor (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 6 Jun 2001 12:24:20 -0700
The Rohn GAS604 is a 6in X 4ft screw anchor. Rohn rates it at 2500# holding power; see bottom of http://www.rohnnet.com/CommPro/Hardware/Guy.htm 73 Mike N2MG _________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00081.html (7,761 bytes)

77. [TowerTalk] Galvanized Hardware (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 11 Jun 2001 05:33:16 -0700
While we're on the topic of hardware - is there a decent source for Rohn-like galvanized hardware other than Rohn itself? I'd especially like to get my hands on some of the galvanized U-bolts that ar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00212.html (7,593 bytes)

78. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 13 Jun 2001 08:05:40 -0700
Steve, you are "half" right. The lift effort is part of the overall load on the ginpole (everyone forgets this), so without any mechanical advantage there is 2X load weight applied to the ginpole. If
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00282.html (10,851 bytes)

79. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 13 Jun 2001 09:06:35 -0700
Nothing "magical" about it... http://www.howstuffworks.com/pulley.htm has some good graphics although no description of the force on the fixed pulley (our ginpole), so one needs to sum up all the "do
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00287.html (14,717 bytes)

80. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 13 Jun 2001 10:40:39 -0700
Why is this NOT how a gin pole is configured? Even if one ties the fixed end of the rope to the tower (say when lifting a beam or rotator that need not rise above the tower top), one has not material
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00296.html (11,172 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu