Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n3ox@n3ox.net: 90 ]

Total 90 documents matching your query.

81. Re: Topband: 160 metre vertical with 'top loading' (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:35:51 -0400
My suspicion is that some taper does occur in air wound loading coils at Yep, and I think this issue is quite interesting. There's this paper by Corum and Corum, Reference [1] on ON4AA's inductor cal
/archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00132.html (14,848 bytes)

82. Re: Topband: 160 metre vertical with 'top loading' (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 01:11:36 -0400
I made a plot this evening that might be of some interest. It started with an EZNEC model (pretty sure one that originated with W5DXP) of a loaded antenna that shows a clear, large current taper. The
/archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00144.html (12,345 bytes)

83. Re: Topband: Effect of current max not at base of vertical. (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 02:07:08 -0400
Leaving the conductivity at 1mS/m and changing only the permittivity from 10 to 80 in a NEC-2 model of a 160m quarterwave over 20 78 foot radials gives a big boost to the low angle radiation. About 4
/archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00133.html (11,775 bytes)

84. Re: Topband: Ground loss query (re inverted L, antenna radiation resistance, & Jerry Sevick), Part II (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:46:06 -0400
The radiation resistance over soil is different than the radiation resistance over perfect earth. The radiation resistance depends on the number, length, and type of radials too: http://www.antennas
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00166.html (8,454 bytes)

85. Re: Topband: 1820 BCB (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:07:45 -0500
I had a bad mix on 1830kHz for a while that would FADE in and out. Well one night it got really awful and started bursting up to S7 or S8. I listened to it on AM and heard the familiar pinging of CH
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00530.html (8,372 bytes)

86. Re: Topband: Fwd: radals fer 160m vertcal (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 00:44:48 -0400
One workaround is to use some other software for plotting. I've used GNU Octave and EZNEC's near field table to make plots of the total field at finite distances: http://n3ox.net/files/nfpatt.png I'
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00106.html (10,957 bytes)

87. Re: Topband: METAL DETECTOR (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:11:04 -0400
I was playing around with an AM receiver in the back yard and I found I didn't even need a signal generator. My vertical has a shunt coil to ground so AM broadcast energy has a path to the radials a
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00236.html (7,327 bytes)

88. Re: Topband: Short radials? (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:12:39 -0400
Is it right that this was with radials significantly longer than 1/4 wave, like close to 3/4 wavelength? _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00307.html (8,761 bytes)

89. Re: Topband: Ground conductivity, permittivity measurement (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:17:51 -0400
I don't know about further out where you'd have to proof an AM station but I just ran some models and there's kind of a weird relationship between vertical electric field strength at 1 wavelength ou
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00061.html (9,153 bytes)

90. Re: Topband: flag for 160m rx in differend size (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:38:51 -0500
Anny Info vy welcome I have been happy with my half size flag. Measured patterns shown at http://www.n3ox.net/projects/flag I think if I lived in a very low noise location it might not have QUITE en
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00074.html (7,728 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu