Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n3ox@n3ox.net: 305 ]

Total 305 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 meter vertical ant (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:09:00 -0500
You're probably not going to do significantly better with a single vertical radiator than your 1/4 wave vertical. There might be some advantages to a half wave vertical, but I'd just feed it at the b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00194.html (9,400 bytes)

62. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 meter vertical ant (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:10:05 -0500
Whoops.. my antenna is at http://www.n3ox.net/projects/sixtyvert _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@conte
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00195.html (8,022 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] question a parasitic element (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:22:14 -0500
GND...It is >already a Director, the vertical part of this parasitic element is 75.45 ft and the sloping part is >64.7 ft... It's only half a director! Just like the driven element, current *must fl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00298.html (7,182 bytes)

64. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading a Pro-AM 160M on other bands? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:24:49 -0500
Yes. The load and antenna impedance are such that the coil reactance goes up while the antenna reactance goes down in frequency. What you end up with is that the loading structures act more or less
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00316.html (8,130 bytes)

65. Re: [TowerTalk] Thrust Bearing Screws & Fingers (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:38:35 -0500
the bearing, not to keep it from slipping >down. Not if it's a real thrust bearing! It would surprise me if a manufacturer made a "thrust bearing" that couldn't take the rated vertical load with the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00349.html (7,199 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] Toploading a Butternut HF6V (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:56:58 -0500
Clever! Was it just capacitively coupled to the main radiator or bare wire or what? _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00385.html (7,602 bytes)

67. Re: [TowerTalk] Wire Dipole Meets High Voltage Electric (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 18:49:04 -0500
If you take W5DXP's suggestion to make a folded dipole out of ladder line, you can purchase copper clad steel ladder line... then you've got good insulation, the strength of copperweld, and an anten
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00018.html (7,547 bytes)

68. Re: [TowerTalk] [RFI] HIGH POWER and RFI... (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:06:45 -0500
Three turns of wire on one of those snap on cores (the rectangular cores that snap onto each other and come two to a pack) measures, inaccurately, on my MFJ-259 160m: 2+j25 80m: 14+j45 40m: 36+j60 2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00063.html (7,369 bytes)

69. Re: [TowerTalk] [RFI] HIGH POWER and RFI... (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:55:27 -0500
Jim, I didn't mean to detract from the suggestion to look at your very good tutorial... that's excellent work and very useful. I just had measured the Radio Shack cores particularly (and they don't s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00066.html (8,822 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] Current imbalance on 450 ohm Ladder Line (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:03:24 -0400
My guess is that the balun on the tuner has insufficient impedance. Even a "balanced" tuner relies on the balun to force current balance... and if it's not an a balun with extremely high common mode
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00249.html (8,587 bytes)

71. Re: [TowerTalk] Current imbalance on 450 ohm Ladder Line (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:18:29 -0400
That's certainly true... but the Palstar unit mentioned isn't one. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00251.html (7,438 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] Current imbalance on 450 ohm Ladder Line (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:27:32 -0400
If you have a current imbalance on open wire line, you have common mode current. Only in the perfectly balanced case (equal and opposite currents) is the line operating with differential mode curren
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00262.html (8,456 bytes)

73. Re: [TowerTalk] Current imbalance on 450 ohm Ladder Line (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:20:03 -0400
Thanks for keeping me honest ;-) It's easy to have nonzero common mode and equal and opposite differential mode currents with coax and two seperate sources... just make current flow on the shield wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00269.html (9,445 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] Changing Air Variables in an Antenna Tuner? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 22:31:57 -0400
Why not add some 250 or 500pF doorknob caps that can be switched in in parallel with the current capacitors? The actual switches will take some care, but maybe some vacuum relays could be used for a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00322.html (7,395 bytes)

75. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Coax Support Sleeve (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 01:38:22 -0400
I went to college in Northern NY and I think the ice storm of '98 deposited about 3 inches of radial ice on everything that stayed in the air long enough to gather that much ... That would be 3200lb
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00419.html (8,859 bytes)

76. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 M vertical and snow. (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:13:13 -0400
Is it a base loaded vertical? The base of the coil is a low impedance point but the antenna side of the coil is high.... so proximity of even a good dielectric to the element in a short base loaded
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00576.html (8,551 bytes)

77. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials - What is the big deal? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 18:15:38 -0400
While this is true, I think we should be supplying new hams with a more useful rule of thumb for a minimal radial system than "try anything, even NONE." Suggesting the laying of zero, one, or two ra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00015.html (9,473 bytes)

78. Re: [TowerTalk] QST (was radials (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 18:07:21 -0400
Why is this thread so binary? No one is telling anyone to stay off the air if they can't put down excellent radial systems, and of course, the handful of dB you get from going from 32 0.2 wavelength
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00038.html (9,486 bytes)

79. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials vs vertical height (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 22:14:03 -0400
Yep, my 60 footer kicks butt on 40m. Probably would with just a ground rod, too, You buy an HF2V and you put it over a ground rod and you're going to have a miserable signal. You put up a resonant i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00048.html (9,353 bytes)

80. Re: [TowerTalk] Using Coax as Ladder Line (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:12:33 -0400
Yes, you can do this to make balanced shielded line, but it doesn't buy you a whole lot. It has basically the same loss as a single coax run, which can be quite a lot if you're using open wire or wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00374.html (7,823 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu