Mail Archive Search: <+from:n4haf@prodigy.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:n4haf@prodigy.net: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] 544 PTO Question (score: 1): Author: n4haf@prodigy.net (Neal); Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 06:31:25 -0400; If you are considering swapping the pto's, then you may as well rebuild the current one. The largest amount of time I've spent rebuilding the pto's is the disassembly of the front panel. The actual r; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00202.html (7,719 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Comparison of Omni C and Trigon IV? (score: 1): Author: n4haf@prodigy.net (NEAL); Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:37:43 -0400; The Omni A, C, and D rigs are far superior to the Triton 4's in terms of the receivers. The Triton Four's do not have the selectivity of the Omni rigs since they use audio filtering. I've also found; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-04/msg00100.html (9,255 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Log Book Program (score: 1): Author: NEAL F" <n4haf@prodigy.net (NEAL F); Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 21:03:46 -0800; I like the LOG-EQF program myself and have used it for general logging for about two years now. Its got some nice features for about 50 bucks. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm S; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00199.html (8,082 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Omni D.. 30 meter ? (score: 1): Author: N4HAF@prodigy.net (NEAL); Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 21:30:03 -0500; Yes, it's possible, but TenTec isnt selling the kit anymore. Perhaps someone can identify a supplier -- Original Message -- From: <KF4EIB@aol.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, November 2; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00427.html (8,323 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]