Mail Archive Search: <+from:n4si@pobox.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:n4si@pobox.com: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: tombstones, etc. (score: 1): Author: n4si@pobox.com (n4si@pobox.com); Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 05:22:42 +0000; I wasn't going to play here, but you guys started it: Our old friend Grommethead Shultz Removed all the interlock bolts. His amp kept on trying, Sending G-S a-flying, Proving amperes times ohms equa; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00033.html (7,368 bytes)
2. [AMPS] A dB or two, is it worth it? (score: 1): Author: n4si@pobox.com (n4si@pobox.com); Date: Fri, 4 Apr 1997 04:07:10 +0000; One needs to do all that to work all the QRP'ers. Me, too! Someone ought to start an award for QRP; not for the people operating QRP, all the rest of us who do all the work scratching out their puny; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00077.html (7,466 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Re: Amps on 30 (score: 1): Author: n4si@pobox.com (n4si@pobox.com); Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 19:49:33 +0000; Thank you! I was wondering what all the excitement about getting amps to work on 30 meters was about. I thought I had forgotten something. 73, Rod N4SI The DXer formerly known as N9AKE (c) 5 Novembe; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00195.html (6,902 bytes)
4. [AMPS] BIG power on 30 meters (score: 1): Author: n4si@pobox.com (n4si@pobox.com); Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 02:29:54 +0000; As if no callsign wasn't justification enough to ignore some peoples' posts, this attitude speaks volumes, doesn't it. 73, Rod N4SI The DXer formerly known as N9AKE (c) 5 November, 1996 -- FAQ on WW; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00201.html (7,100 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Re: More 30 M. stuff (score: 1): Author: n4si@pobox.com (n4si@pobox.com); Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 20:03:21 +0000; Ummm, if it's an FCC regulation (which has already been determined; Part 97, paragraph 313) then that's the law. Or is it just a rule? The point is, it is the limit that we in the U.S. (sorry, rest; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00219.html (6,911 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Re: Policy (score: 1): Author: n4si@pobox.com (n4si@pobox.com); Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 23:34:34 +0000; This has to be the biggest load of crap I have ever seen. If an individual were attacking another, or if one were consistently violating the charter of the reflector (whatever that might be), or if; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00294.html (7,197 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Re: Anonymity (score: 1): Author: n4si@pobox.com (n4si@pobox.com); Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 00:01:49 +0000; I agree. If an opinion is worth sharing, considering, or responding to, it is worth signing your name to. Sounds too much like DXCOP that made a couple of time wasting posts on another reflector a c; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00081.html (7,001 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Greetings (score: 1): Author: n4si@pobox.com (n4si@pobox.com); Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 23:10:15 +0000; Let me be among the first to say hello to everyone. I am looking forward to seeing some great info on this reflector. I am not all that great on RF stuff, so I won't be writing as many essays as I do; /archives//html/Amps/1997-02/msg00004.html (6,673 bytes)
9. [AMPS] >3-500Z Biz (score: 1): Author: n4si@pobox.com (n4si@pobox.com); Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:41 +0000; Sounds like a guy (not Tom) that should be writing for one of the high-end audio magazines. They do amazing things with their ears. (tongue planted exceptionally far in cheek; TPEFIC?) They say they; /archives//html/Amps/1997-02/msg00083.html (7,370 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]