Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4zr@comcast.net: 169 ]

Total 169 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [CQ-Contest] Precedence? (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:39:44 -0500
I think most folks use PREC? but if the guy on the other end says "?" I try "NR?" in hope that he will concatenate number and precedence, and if necessary, "AGN PSE". But I agree, not everyone gets i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00050.html (7,822 bytes)

102. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Zone trivia (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 16:44:57 -0500
According to the CTY.DAT file, which is as close to a universal arbiter as you'll get, probably, none of India is in CQ Zone 23, and China is all zone 23.  The situation with ITU zones is more compli
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00107.html (8,883 bytes)

103. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Zone trivia (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:40:49 -0500
Apologies to all - it's been a while since I looked at the cty.dat file, and I misread. Bob is correct.  Here's the actual entry.  The big block of prefixes is the exceptions, not the rule. China: 24
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00114.html (12,448 bytes)

104. [CQ-Contest] RBN Stats for CQWW CW (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 10:35:57 -0500
-- 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now spotting RTTY activity worldwide. For spots, please use your favorite "retail" DX cluster. ___________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00008.html (6,877 bytes)

105. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Public Logs (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 09:09:02 -0500
I find it extraordinary that the ARRL and CQ have done so little to implement interoperability between their contest log-checking efforts.  Of course, ARRL might find it difficult to justify the cost
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00063.html (11,500 bytes)

106. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Public Logs (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 15:59:30 -0500
Oh, no question - way back in the day (early 2000s, I think), I QSLed everything in my logs that was a first for the band and mode.  I used to go through exercises where I would sort my bureau QSLs b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00067.html (15,315 bytes)

107. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Story of Online QSLs (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 09:24:00 -0500
Thanks, Goran, for reminding me of that era.  The process for uploading logs, however, is now really simple - perhaps you're thinking of the process for securing an initial registration on LOTW, whic
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00075.html (8,279 bytes)

108. [CQ-Contest] Soliciting New Patterns for the RBN (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 17:00:10 -0500
During January, I plan to publish an updated patt3ch.lst file for the Reverse Beacon Network.  Forgive me if you know this already, but the purpose of the pattern file is to improve the accuracy of C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00092.html (10,018 bytes)

109. [CQ-Contest] Happy New Year and Thank You to our Volunteer Node-ops from the RBN Team (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:09:39 -0500
This seems like a good time to remind users of the RBN about how much we owe to the volunteer node-ops (something over 170 of them)  who make up the network.  Without them, their efforts, and often-s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00107.html (8,337 bytes)

110. Re: [CQ-Contest] There goes the Clean Sweep (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 21:54:16 -0500
PEI is a thoroughly delightful place with a couple of big stations.  I suspect the real effect will be to make the Maritime section harder to get. It's enough to encourage a road trip to New Brunswic
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00020.html (8,619 bytes)

111. Re: [CQ-Contest] There goes the Clean Sweep (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 09:07:42 -0500
With apologies to Mike and the other VE9s. my reason in specifying NB was simply that it's closer to me by a fair distance than Nova Scotia.  I've actually never had any trouble getting MAR in Sweeps
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00029.html (11,036 bytes)

112. [CQ-Contest] New RBN Pattern File - Rerminder (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 07:54:09 -0500
Last month, I wrote on this reflector about our plan to release a new pattern file for the RBN before the ARRL CW DX Contest.  I invited contesters with new and heretofore unused callsign patterns (n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00120.html (10,025 bytes)

113. Re: [CQ-Contest] WARC Band Contesting is Really Not a Thing Now (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:24:06 -0500
John's last point is the key, for me - an effective no-brainer counter to the anti-contester squall about our "hogging" the bands.  Let's not spoil a good thing. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse B
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-02/msg00083.html (10,153 bytes)

114. Re: [CQ-Contest] WARC band contesting is a thing now ! (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 16:57:14 -0500
Seems likely to me that it was simple ignorance by the organizers.  I've seen a number of instances where inexperienced folks volunteered to handle a state QSO party and had one of those "wouldn't it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-02/msg00105.html (10,450 bytes)

115. [CQ-Contest] Is RTTY Only a Contest Mode? (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 20:53:52 -0500
I run an RBN node near Baltimore, MD spotting both CW and RTTY 160-12M.  During any normal weekend day, I'll spot maybe 1 RTTY station an hour.  A big contest goes on the air (like this weekend) , an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-02/msg00107.html (6,962 bytes)

116. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is RTTY Only a Contest Mode? (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2020 07:51:38 -0500
I really wasn't implying anything about "what killed what."  Just wondering where day-to-day RTTY went. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now spotting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-02/msg00110.html (9,071 bytes)

117. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 21:59:15 -0500
There is a raft of interrelated parameters that can be set in the KPA-1500 firmware on a per-band basis, relating to the allowable SWR.  The KPA-1500 manual is of limited help on these, and much more
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00027.html (12,593 bytes)

118. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 11:25:47 -0400
Good question, Ed. As one of the "culprits" who developed the RBN, I'm basically in favor of contesters using technology, but I'm inclined to agree with you that "advertising" of the sort you describ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00045.html (10,606 bytes)

119. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:33:26 -0400
I just heard V55A's end of our 10-meter QSO, running about 1400 watts to my KPA-1500, and I'm blown away.  It sounded just the same as when I play my recorded messages here.  Granted, I was careful n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00047.html (15,348 bytes)

120. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:11:39 -0400
Sterling mentioned one intriguing possibility, the use of delay.  Wouldn't a long-enough delay eliminate the complaint about soliciting contacts by non-amateur means?  I'm thinking in terms of an hou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00107.html (10,770 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu