Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4zr@comcast.net: 169 ]

Total 169 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [CQ-Contest] Doctor DX clone (if you never used it, you just don't "get it") (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 15:46:21 -0400
73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now spotting RTTY activity worldwide. For spots, please use your favorite "retail" DX cluster. ______________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00017.html (10,015 bytes)

142. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Doctor DX (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 20:24:21 -0400
Here's the message from the author of Dr. DX.  If you want a copy of HLRadio.exe for Windows, please write to him. Takes some setting up, but it looks to me like a pretty nice job. Pete, Please go ah
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00018.html (7,485 bytes)

143. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 22:00:22 -0400
Amen, Steve - what a shock for those who hoped that changes among directors and new CEO who contests would improve things in Newington. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at <http://r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00147.html (14,322 bytes)

144. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ve8 Mult (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 21:59:03 -0500
Do we know whether the new VY1s are permanent/semi-permanent residents in NT?  It strikes me that an actively supportive attitude on our part down here could foster a couple of enthusiastic contester
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00033.html (10,378 bytes)

145. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes Exchange History (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:23:13 -0500
I had 3 QSOs in the 1954 SS but unfortunately my old paper log doesn't show the full exchange.  I was running a Heath AT-1 at 20 watts and a Hallicrafters S-40 receiver.  My 1955 SS log only reflects
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00041.html (9,580 bytes)

146. Re: [CQ-Contest] Key Clicks.... Continuing Problem (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 22:40:55 -0500
What Randy said.  If you think that involving the CAC would render the decision process too lengthy and cumbersome, then change the process. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at <htt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00088.html (21,834 bytes)

147. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Single Op Rules (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:03:05 -0500
When I started to advocate for a 24-hour category in CQWW, maybe 15 years ago, I had to endure a scorching by K3EST at Dayton for even having the temerity to suggest such a thing.  Then a few years l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00179.html (8,966 bytes)

148. [CQ-Contest] The impending demise of SSB spotting in contests - and should we care? (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:33:59 -0500
Did you know that over 40,000 different stations made at least one contact with the 8500 stations who submitted logs for  the CQWW SSB contest in 2018?   Without the non-entrant, casual ops, SSB cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00192.html (8,757 bytes)

149. Re: [CQ-Contest] funny interference on 15m? (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:40:47 -0500
Yes, I had the same thing here on 15 at that time.  I was debating what to do with the rest of my Sunday when it suddenly stopped.  Before that I had rotated my C-3 tribander and did not notice any s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00000.html (8,505 bytes)

150. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW is an unfair Contest -- A solutiion! (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 21:52:31 -0500
You have altogether too much time on your hands, Mike.  Actually, it's not a bad idea, but they still need to do something about the CQWW exchange. With zones, it's just a callsign-copying contest. 
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00047.html (10,453 bytes)

151. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW is an unfair Contest -- A solutiion! (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 09:38:49 -0500
Well, sort of.  The WPX mults make for a unique profile.  One could still use band/zones as mults in the "new CQWWCW". 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at <http://reversebeacon.net>
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00053.html (8,807 bytes)

152. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Question (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 11:19:25 -0500
 I think that the rationale behind the CQWW rule is that looking at spots of your own station would influence/improve an op's decisions about band choice, antenna choice or direction, etc.  To me, th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00091.html (9,150 bytes)

153. [CQ-Contest] New RBN Feature - Node Map (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 21:51:25 -0500
Thanks to Mark Glenn, K7MJG, the RBN beta site's world map now displays currently and recently active RBN nodes, along with spots.  Red dots denote nodes that have made at least one spot in the last
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00195.html (7,045 bytes)

154. [CQ-Contest] FT-4/8 Contesters Using RBN Spots? (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 22:55:31 -0500
A number of the RBN Node-Ops have asked whether/how much  RBN-origin FT-4/8 spots are used during contests.  I'd love to hear from RTTY/FT-4/8 contesters, particularly re: last weekend.  Send direct
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-01/msg00005.html (7,363 bytes)

155. Re: [CQ-Contest] New BETA RBN map....QTH issue (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 22:30:03 -0500
It is a beta site and obviously there is a bug in that function - I have informed the guys doing the programming. We're also still tinkering with the map, but in this case it's QRZ that's misplacing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00034.html (9,300 bytes)

156. [CQ-Contest] Single Op Single Band Unlimited (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:04:37 -0500
I was just reviewing the ARRL CW DX Contest rules through the ARRL contest portal, and I'm confused.   The Full Rules say. under HF Categories: "Single Operator and Single Operator Unlimited entrants
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00107.html (7,343 bytes)

157. [CQ-Contest] Getting Spotted by the RBN in Contests (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:02:27 -0500
Something worth knowing - the *default* configuration for CW Skimmer Server limits CW segments to the first 70 KHz of each band , except for 160, where the top edge is set at 1840.  Many nodes are st
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00110.html (7,558 bytes)

158. [CQ-Contest] Rules document change (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 12:27:24 -0500
Paul, N1SFE, the Contest Manager at ARRL, just sent me an e-mail, not copied to the reflector, saying that he had fixed the rules to make it clear that single band entries cannot be assisted.  I'm gl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00113.html (7,102 bytes)

159. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Recordings (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:13:06 -0500
Recordings of most of my 1000 or so ARRL DX CW QSOs are available on https://qsorder.hamradiomap.com/ -- 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network web server at <http://beta.reversebeaco
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00134.html (7,084 bytes)

160. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest recordings (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 18:25:20 -0500
You're right, Mike - I hadn't thought of that aspect.  I'll hold off from now on. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network web server at <http://beta.reversebeacon.net>. For spots, plea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00153.html (8,535 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu