Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4zr@comcast.net: 169 ]

Total 169 documents matching your query.

61. [CQ-Contest] RBN Enhancements (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:30:13 -0500
At 0900Z on Wednesday, the RBN server team will begin a brief planned outage of the RBN's web site.  Over the next 3-7 hours, they will install significant new back end components for the RBN server,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00273.html (7,527 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] Raw scores for WW CW (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 10:33:42 -0500
What would be even more interesting is to know what physical setup they were using - I'm sort of betting on a multi-multi (at least 6 transmitters) with interlocks to stay within the rules for multi-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-12/msg00067.html (8,789 bytes)

63. [CQ-Contest] Need Crowne Plaza Reservation (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:38:30 -0500
Anyone have an extra room at the Crowne Plaza for CTU through Saturday night of the Dayton /Xenia hamvention?  Please drop me a note and I'll arrange to take it off your hands. -- 73, Pete N4ZR Check
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-01/msg00054.html (6,838 bytes)

64. [CQ-Contest] Another Kind of Recording (hi) (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:37:10 -0500
I may be the last contester on the planet to discover this, but Audacity offers some truly incredible capabilities for our purposes.  Most folks are probably aware that you can use it to normalize al
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-01/msg00219.html (7,859 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's with the power = 0 watts exchange? (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 08:23:03 -0500
I worked one too, with a strong signal. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now spotting RTTY activity worldwide. For spots, please use your favorite "re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00145.html (11,656 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting 10 years from now (2007) (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:38:11 -0400
Damn, we were smart back then.  What happened? 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now spotting RTTY activity worldwide. For spots, please use your favor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-03/msg00266.html (7,825 bytes)

67. [CQ-Contest] Ingenious prefixes and the RBN (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 08:46:45 -0400
This may be old news to many of us, but VE3NEA's CW Skimmer Server determines how "skeptical" to be about a callsign, based on a file of all expected callsign patterns. This assessment in turn affect
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-04/msg00141.html (8,185 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] Weird Calls and RBN (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 08:11:58 -0400
VC#@ is already flagged in the file as a common prefix. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now spotting RTTY activity worldwide. For spots, please use y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-04/msg00151.html (9,837 bytes)

69. [CQ-Contest] RBN Announcement on FT8 Spotting (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 09:35:38 -0400
As some may be aware, weve been debating for some time about whether the RBN should handle FT8 spots.  A few weeks, ago, several prolific RBN nodes began spotting FT8 signals, using the combination o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-06/msg00074.html (11,041 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] [DX-IS] RBN Announcement on FT8 Spotting [1 Attachment] (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 14:52:59 -0400
Sorry, but I don't agree, Hans.  The current arrangement of one FT8 dial frequency per band will not survive the first big DXpedition or, perhaps, even Field Day.  You'll need to know who's where, ju
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-06/msg00083.html (22,099 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] [sysops] RBN Announcement on FT8 Spotting (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 14:56:54 -0400
The RBN applies the same standard to FT8 as to CW and RTTY - only CQ (equivalent) spots and only re-spotting once every 10 minutes on a given dial frequency.  However, as our first tests indicate, th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-06/msg00085.html (12,318 bytes)

72. [CQ-Contest] URGENT - Making sure your RBN node spots WRTC competitors (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:37:24 -0400
As has been pointed out, there is some risk that the WRTC organizers will decide to use a format for the special callsigns of WRTC competitors that is outside the scope of the current 3-character pat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00123.html (8,762 bytes)

73. [CQ-Contest] URGENT FOR RBN SKIMMER OPS - Making sure your RBN node spots WRTC Y8#@ callsigns (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:12:57 -0400
The WRTC organizers have just announced that the WRTC competitors will all use callsigns in the format Y8#@, where "#" is a single digit and "@" is a single letter.  The calls actually to be issued w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00129.html (9,244 bytes)

74. [CQ-Contest] It's time for an Assisted category in NAQP (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:48:07 -0400
Judging by the commentary recently on various reflectors (and my own experience last weekend), it is time for NAQP to institute an Assisted category, rather than lumping all one-transmitter assisted
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-08/msg00017.html (7,501 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 09:07:18 -0400
I think this is being made a lot more complicated than it needs to be.  What's wrong with Single Op, SO Assisted, Multi-Single and Multi-multi (the latter two both assisted)?.  There are more than a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-08/msg00099.html (11,863 bytes)

76. [CQ-Contest] RBN Map Issues (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 17:43:00 -0400
Google Maps has managed to break the mapping function of the RBN website with code changes related to their new pricing algorithm.  Worse yet, it also broke the callsign display and search functions.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-10/msg00027.html (7,717 bytes)

77. [CQ-Contest] Wireless noise-cancelling headphones - using the microphone? (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:33:02 -0500
I've been reading some interesting stuff on contesters using relatively inexpensive Bluetooth noise cancelling headphones.  I've also noticed that some of these headsets have single or dual microphon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00108.html (7,471 bytes)

78. Re: [CQ-Contest] Pileups and calling freqs (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:16:45 -0500
I totally agree.  An added fillip - it is extremely likely that cluster spots on CW will not be in zero beat with the CQing station, because of rounding to the nearest 100 Hz division.  The only thin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00173.html (9,464 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] WSJT-X and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 08:52:34 -0500
Stan, it seems to me that you lost one step in your description - decoding/understanding the transmission with your ears and your brain. To me, that is a "bright line."  At the point where the operat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00046.html (10,655 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] Robotic contest operating, why knot? (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 21:30:37 -0500
S56A claimed to have operated a robot contester more than 20 years ago. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now spotting RTTY activity worldwide. For spo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00182.html (11,341 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu