Mail Archive Search: <+from:n6ig@netcom.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:n6ig@netcom.com: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] WRTC Zone Mult Bug? (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 16:14:49 -0700 (PDT); I pointed this out to Ken, he says 15 is the limit and suggested another window. I suggested the Alt-M being redefined as an "HQ window". I don't want to do this in a vacuum, however, and seek other'; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-06/msg00017.html (7,337 bytes)
2. [ct-user] radio communication (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 16:29:38 -0800 (PST); Interesting post. We used 9.37A over the weekend in a two-computer multi-two situation at K6RC. Station one was an FT1000D, station two was an FT1000MP. Station two computer crashed dozens of times o; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00038.html (8,736 bytes)
3. [ct-user] CT log outputs versus ARRL requirements (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 09:34:29 -0800 (PST); Group: With the ARRL's new-found fervor for enforcing log format and deadline requirements, I wanted to make sure the multi-two log I send in to the league is in compliance. The requirements from the; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00048.html (9,589 bytes)
4. [ct-user] CT log outputs versus ARRL requirements (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 10:48:08 -0800 (PST); I was told that you needed to use a version above 9.34 for proper FT1000MP control. I used 9.23 for years, it was very stable. The addition of the MP precipitated the upgrade. Using 9.37A the state s; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00052.html (8,746 bytes)
5. [ct-user] WPX SSB? (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 20:21:43 -0800 (PST); Since it is only supported in 9.39, I would say you need to purchase the upgrade. 73, Jim N6IG -- Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com WWW: http; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00057.html (7,140 bytes)
6. [ct-user] Move the SS Prec to Number field? (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 15:15:18 -0800 (PST); You rarely have to "tab" to that field anyway. I agree it should remain a default "A" since that is what most people are, that saves ever having to go to that field. Having to type in 2000 "A"s durin; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00024.html (8,160 bytes)
7. [ct-user] CT W\FT1000 (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:56:38 -0800 (PST); Assuming it really IS an FT1000 (not an MP): You CAN'T directly connect the CAT DIN to a computer. The CAT is a TTL level, you need the Yaesu level converter box or some sort of clone. If you had an; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-01/msg00073.html (7,038 bytes)
8. [ct-user] .brk question (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 10:40:57 -0800 (PST); Why is it that the total number of countries per band in the .brk file created by writelog always exceeds the total number of countries listed on the summary sheet? The summary sheet is correct, but; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-12/msg00039.html (6,849 bytes)
9. [ct-user] Y2K (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 10:45:14 -0800 (PST); I have seen questions here recently about Y2K issues and CT, and have wondered the same. I did a non-scientific test, I set my computer to 12-31-1999 at 23:55 and started to run a mock contest. As th; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-12/msg00047.html (7,338 bytes)
10. [ct-user] CT 9.37A (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 14:36:49 -0800 (PST); 9.37 said this as well. I operated CW SS with 9.37 and Phone SS with 9.37A and experienced no problem with that message, not sure what it means but it is odd... I jumped from 9.22 to 9.37, so there m; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-11/msg00120.html (7,311 bytes)
11. [ct-user] Multi-multi serial numbers... (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 09:25:12 -0700 (PDT); Given a fast enough and robust enough network, there is no reason why sequential numbers couldn't be assigned given the proper coding. Contest rules. But most contests with serial numbers that I oper; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-10/msg00006.html (8,840 bytes)
12. [ct-user] Re: your mail (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 19:39:00 -0700 (PDT); Make sure to "fix" the information in the dummy-logged QSOs. This problem has driven me nuts for years in operating SS with two networked computers. I discussed this at length with K1EA at Dayton thi; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-09/msg00001.html (7,830 bytes)
13. [ct-user] Doubt in multi-op operations (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1998 08:36:07 -0700 (PDT); Sorry, this isn't true. If you have LOGGED the QSO on one computer, the other computer won't send the same serial number. But if both are starting a QSO at the same time, they WILL send the same seri; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-08/msg00011.html (8,542 bytes)
14. [ct-user] Single-multi operation (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 09:44:26 -0800 (PST); That's why I use two computers, two monitors, two keyboards, two radios, networked together, along with a keyer line interlock device. Of course, CT has other problems in serial-numbered contests suc; /archives//html/CT-User/1997-11/msg00007.html (7,378 bytes)
15. [ct-user] CT & 2 Radios (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 07:38:06 -0800 (PST); Two radios are easily set up in the menus in the beginning. Assuming you have the appropriate TSRs loaded and the program set up, you switch from Radio One to Radio two with CTRL-. (thats CTRL-period; /archives//html/CT-User/1997-11/msg00040.html (7,974 bytes)
16. [ct-user] K1EA whereabouts? (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 09:52:14 -0700 (PDT); Per K1EA's suggestion, I sent e-mail to his home address regarding CT features and testing, that was returned as an unknown address. I then sent to his work e-mail address, that was almost two weeks; /archives//html/CT-User/1997-07/msg00040.html (6,682 bytes)
17. CT 9.20 in ARRL DX (score: 1): Author: n6ig@netcom.com (Jim Pratt); Date: Tue, 21 Feb 1995 08:50:47 -0800 (PST); We noticed this at W6GO in the CQWW contest and reported it as a "bug". It was obviously still there for ARRL DX. I agree that it is a problem. What we saw is that it seems to depend on the size of t; /archives//html/CT-User/1995-02/msg00043.html (9,864 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]