There's already an assisted category. A nyone who uses prefills from past NAQP's have been assisted by this feature of most logging software. What more do we need? I predict that in the near future
That brings up the 1956 (OR '57) ARRL CW Sweepsteaks. I operated from WŘANA, University of Denver ARC, Single Op, Single Transmitter (it was a Johnson Navigator, I seem to remember), and separate NC
The "FULL DAY OF HELL" featuring Feld Hell Mode, will begin tomorrow morning at 0000Z (which is actually this evening September 29 here in the United States.) This is a "laid back" contest which ha
One could always rig up several rigs to run FT-8 as a robot, and enter as Zero Operator, Multi Rig Entry. If enough operators did this effort, perhaps the "olde fogeys who won't adapt to new technolo
Jim: Thanks for the compliment to my mental capacity. It's is great to have it acknowledged publicly. I've only seen FT8 working with an operator clicking and calling stations, or having others call
Thanks, Jamie; Every time I mention a "ROBOT" or similar for CW contesting I get beat up by ops who say categorically say "CW Skimmers can do anywhere near as good as he human brain." Yet, I just pri
Then, why do I get beaten up for predicting that a robot controlled CW entry will be the top score in something like CQWW DX or ??? 72/73 de n8xx Hg QRP >99.44% of the time S56A claimed to have opera
Perhaps it is a spur on some sort of transmitter in the commercial bands adjacent to 20 meters. If it continues, perhaps we hams could decode the info, make it public, and beat the odss on the stock