Mail Archive Search: <+from:n9br@rsg.org>

Results:

References: [ +from:n9br@rsg.org: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] Very Pleased (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill R); Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 13:17:14 -0600; Hi Bud, Not being able to update past the last five q's has been the one annoying problem with TR forever....Tree won't fix it.... I am sure he (and one or two others hi hi) don't make very many mist; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00031.html (8,116 bytes)
2. [TRLog] Very Pleased (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill); Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 18:43:51 -0800; Hi Dale, Give me a break...don't you think accuracy would give you a better score? Control N ...what? Doesn't it seem a little strange that you can have a logging program that you CAN'T edit a logged; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00038.html (12,535 bytes)
3. [TRLog] Very Pleased (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill R); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 09:39:34 -0600; Bob, You're missing the point, a logging program should allow you to edit in real time to maintain an up to date and accurate log. A contest program should allow you to work quickly. Shutting down, r; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00047.html (16,340 bytes)
4. [TRLog] Very Pleased (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill R); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 09:56:02 -0600; Mark, Sorry you think it's a " cheap shot" and better not made in public....why? I'm discussing TR ...didn't personally attack anyone. I merely said I think TR would be better if it had editing......; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00048.html (16,904 bytes)
5. [TRLog] Very Pleased (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill R); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 11:48:58 -0600; Mark, Wow you are way... WAY out in left field. I didn't "ridicule" anyone...Not you, (don't think you had anything to do with the thread...) or anyone else on the reflector... Tree knows how I feel; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00050.html (9,233 bytes)
6. [TRLog] Very Pleased (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill R); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 11:56:20 -0600; Hi Gil, Thanks for the idea..I'll try it and see if I can get it to work. Sounds like it could.....and if you don't have to shut down TR it would be a lot faster. What editor are you using? 73 Bill N; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00051.html (20,498 bytes)
7. [TRLog] A good compromise? (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill R); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 14:42:36 -0600; Hi Tom, Sounds like a winner to me too if it could be done.... Tree any hope? 73 Bill N9BR and -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00058.html (10,202 bytes)
8. [TRLog] REAL-TIME EDITING of LOG (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill); Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 04:10:17 -0800; Believe it.... Keep practicing and after LOTS of hard work you'll get better too !! Editing won't seem so hard. It'll help your score just like the two radio mult/run stuff does. Well maybe it would; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00143.html (8,569 bytes)
9. [TRLog] Edit QSOs in MultiOp (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill R); Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 12:01:17 -0600; WOW.... Do I detect a very very slim chance of a fix for the forever problem of editing Q's beyond the five showing, ....without having to stop and shut the program down?? That would be really apprec; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-10/msg00078.html (8,114 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]