Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:na9d@speakeasy.net: 168 ]

Total 168 documents matching your query.

41. [TowerTalk] static drainage (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Mon Jan 27 12:12:27 2003
That sounds like his ground system wasn't adequate to handle the surge. You need to have a distributed ground system on your tower. And I guess that's another reason to have all your grounds tied tog
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00460.html (8,876 bytes)

42. [TowerTalk] Full wave loop on 80m : Impedance 50 or 75 Ohms?? (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Tue Jan 28 07:52:05 2003
Lee, Dug out an old textbook from my antenna class in college (Antenna Theory and Design by Stutzman and Thiele). On page 250 of the book they are discussing full wave loop antennas. "The square loop
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00472.html (9,470 bytes)

43. [TowerTalk] static drainage (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Tue Jan 28 08:01:26 2003
I thought about this some more. I bet he did not have his shack ground and tower grounds connected. I wouldn't say the lightning "traveled through the ground and up into his shack again." Rather, whe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00473.html (9,303 bytes)

44. [TowerTalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Tue Jan 28 20:30:38 2003
I have a friend who just put up a Prosistel rotor. It's one of the smallest they make (second smallest one). It is a BEAUTIFUL rotor. There is ZERO and I mean ZERO play in it. While I can wiggle my H
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00505.html (8,255 bytes)

45. [Towertalk] Pouring base of tower (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (na9d@speakeasy.net)
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:42:06 -0800
You are absolutely right. If it is a guyed tower, most of the stress at the base will be a compression force. Very little if any lateral forces on the concrete as these are all taken up by the guys.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00204.html (9,014 bytes)

46. [Towertalk] Roof Tower stuff.... 2 by 4s, city, :( (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 13:03:15 -0600
Jason, First mistake: Going to the city to get a permit for a roof tower. If you were going to put up a small roof tripod for a TV antenna would you get a permit? Likely not. I've said this many, man
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00248.html (11,432 bytes)

47. [Towertalk] Roof Tower stuff.... 2 by 4s, city, :( (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 16:52:46 -0600
Not a bad way to do it, but what about water and moisture collecting under the plywood? I think you are in CA so you don't likely get as much rain as we do here and I certainly don't think you have t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00254.html (9,464 bytes)

48. [Towertalk] Roof Tower stuff.... 2 by 4s, city, :( (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 13:56:21 -0600
Jason, This sounds like a good plan. I agree completely with the idea of running long bolts into the 2x8's across the joists. Frankly, install 2x8's as long as you can possibly get into your attic. L
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00271.html (10,497 bytes)

49. [Towertalk] Lighting Protection and Roof Towers (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 20:30:22 -0600
It's not ideal, but it can be worked around. Just make sure you don't have any sharp bends. I made this mistake and while I haven't been hit, it's best not to have any. A sharp bend looks like a high
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00356.html (13,555 bytes)

50. [Towertalk] Lighting Protection and Roof Towers (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 00:03:01 -0600
Yeah, it's all about where the potential can build up. Like I said, if you can make your antenna/tower look as much like ground as possible and prevent any charge from building up on it, you are less
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00360.html (9,780 bytes)

51. [Towertalk] Lighting Protection and Roof Towers (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 06:26:07 -0600
UGH! Any object in the air is a potential target. Both sides of your dipole are. While the side of the dipole which is connected to ground is at or near, RF Ground, there is still a rather inductive
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00365.html (10,224 bytes)

52. [Towertalk] Lighting Protection and Roof Towers (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 09:10:50 -0600
It depends on your antenna itself. Many antennas are DC grounded. Some are not. DC Ground and RF Ground are two very different things, by the way. You ensure your antenna is properly grounded/protect
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00369.html (13,016 bytes)

53. [Towertalk] Lighting Protection and Roof Towers (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 22:51:02 -0600
Hence my comments that just following "code" is not always best. My niece's husband is a civil engineer. When he saw the way we were building my deck this summer he said it was overkill. I wouldn't g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00387.html (10,788 bytes)

54. [Towertalk] Re: Lighting Protection and Roof Towers &Lightning Rods (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 14:03:23 -0600
It is more complex than that. But there's two elements of protection. One is trying to prevent a strike in the first place. The second is what to do with the strike energy if one does occur. I will n
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00403.html (8,971 bytes)

55. [Towertalk] position lanyard and stuff. (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 06:30:01 -0600
I am really skeptical of this statement. I have done a great deal amount of sailboat racing on yachts up to 50 feet over the last 10 years. I've been on three Chicago-Mackinac and one Port Huron-Mack
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00576.html (8,374 bytes)

56. [Towertalk] Knots (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:54:53 -0600
Agreed, Phil. Yeah, the one handed bowline trick is pretty cool. The only thing I thought of is looking at the type of load applied to the knot. In sailing, we generally have pretty static (albeit la
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00581.html (9,221 bytes)

57. [Towertalk] Guy Lengths, climbing unguyed tower sections (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 06:33:20 -0600
You're right! When we did my tower, we guyed it around 25 feet for the first set. The next set was going to be at approximately the 50 foot level. The day we put the top sections up, we had 2 excelle
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00029.html (8,752 bytes)

58. [Towertalk] Guy wires on a 20 meter tower (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 06:28:55 -0600
Go to: http://www.rohnnet.com/rohnnet2001/catalog/pdfs/25G/25G-9.pdf That should give you a nice indication of proper heights. It's all in feet but you should be able to translate to metric. Well, N4
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00060.html (7,672 bytes)

59. [Towertalk] Towertalk Huh?!? (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 06:34:28 -0600
I am going to take a stab at this, but perhaps I will not be 100% correct. The "live" end of the cable has the majority of the forces on it. It has much greater tension on it than the dead end of the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00098.html (8,791 bytes)

60. [Towertalk] Towertalk Huh?!? (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 15:53:03 -0600
That's not correct. I used them on my new setup since they were considerably cheaper than big grips. The grips are certainly easier and quicker. 73, Jon NA9D -- Jon Ogden NA9D (ex: KE9NA) Citizen of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00108.html (9,117 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu