Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:neal.laugman@gmail.com: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Replacment cw filter (score: 1)
Author: Neal Laugman <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:13:27 -0600
Hi Marty, Of course there is the alternative to spend as much as the rig is worth: http://www.inrad.net/home.php?cat=95 I have Inrad filters in several rigs, and I will probably get a filter like you
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00318.html (9,701 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Replacment cw filter (score: 1)
Author: Neal Laugman <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:18:58 -0600
Rick, Hmmm - like all of us, they eventually wither away and die ... hi - and rodger on the KVG filter. Maybe Mike is right; just add on an audio filter. Even a passive LPF like KK7B designed for his
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00325.html (9,731 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Airpax Breaker Part and Source (score: 1)
Author: nl7vl<neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 14:31:40 -0600
So what you are getting at is recreating the crowbar circuit to trip things just like the AC supplies do? (At least that's what the Century 21 does off the top of my head.) -- Neal <snip> -=-=-=-=-=
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00042.html (9,779 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Airpax Breaker Part and Source (score: 1)
Author: neal.laugman@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 14:59:33 -0600
Dr. Jerry: I stand corrected. Guess I've been away from things too long. Back to the books for a refresher! -- Neal, NL7VL/9 _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00045.html (9,287 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: Neal Laugman <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:03:10 -0600
Jerry and the group: I wondered if there was a name for that effect. Polyrope was indeed my enemy one 30 below moonlit night out in the Alaskan Bush. I had a 20-foot spruce pole mast attached to a ca
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00271.html (12,165 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Aeolian Vibration (score: 1)
Author: Neal Laugman <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:20:20 -0600
That was exactly it. It was holding up the end of an 80m inverted vee and I tried to bungee the line but it just found new resonance. I finally just dropped the line that night. I really needed to g
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00274.html (13,926 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Logic Board Failure (score: 1)
Author: Neal Laugman <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:41:26 -0600
Agree. I think I'd ask TT to get VERY specific about what part failed - not just say it's a bad board thinking that sort of reply gets them off the hook. This problem has wider ramifications about c
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00335.html (11,264 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Obsolescence was: Omni 6 Logic Board Failure (score: 1)
Author: Neal Laugman <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:09:28 -0600
Uh - yeah. My solution to the problem is this: Barring any intellectual property or licensing issues, release a version of the source code into the public domain and let a 3rd party manufacture the s
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00348.html (16,172 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] ant (score: 1)
Author: Neal Laugman <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:00:46 -0600
Airdux is the stouter of the two - but still plastic - maybe a nylon or delrin, but not polycarbonate like miniductor. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= _______
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00354.html (15,173 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Obsolescence was: Omni 6 Logic Board Failure (score: 1)
Author: Neal Laugman <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:38:39 -0600
I do see that Maxim does offer a drop-in replacement for the DS1285. I'm curious enough about this as to contact TT next week. I was a few years behind you and yes - it takes quite a while to pump ou
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00379.html (15,397 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] ant (score: 1)
Author: Neal Laugman <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:44:07 -0600
My bad - I did mean polystyrene, but I was under the impression the Airdux coil had a denser plastic. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= ________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00380.html (10,330 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] ant (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 03:10:14 -0600
Guess it's better than the existentialisms "nothing exists for sure." rotfl ... Yes great fun after a hard Friday night on the list :) My insomnia is waiting in the bedroom for me, so bye for now. -
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00394.html (10,765 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Logic Board Failure (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:53:46 -0600
Don, Apparently you aren't the only one ... -- Neal, NL7VL -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00407.html (17,189 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Logic Board Failure (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:19:03 -0600
Robb, I was actually referring to the glut of TT rigs on ebay and elsewhere. I plan on contacting Ten-Tec tomorrow and discussing some possibilities with them regarding this matter. Having a spare is
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00410.html (21,196 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Logic Board Failure (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:55:27 -0600
My experience in field troubleshooting in the days of discrete components and early TTL/CMOS was that 90% of problems always had a relationship to a connection - be it an IC socket, bad solder joint,
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00420.html (12,257 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Logic Board Failure (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:13:30 -0600
OK - gotcha. We'll see what happens. But is it the EPROM? I didn't see where anyone said it was the problem for sure. -- Neal, NL7VL -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00423.html (11,688 bytes)

17. [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:26:07 -0600
Yesterday I talked to a couple of people at Ten-Tec about the logic board situation. The bottom line was: There was really nothing that could be done as it was a "combination of things" that could ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00444.html (9,765 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:14:19 -0600
Hi Ron, I'm happy that other people are thinking about this! It's complicated. Whew! That's quite a task, and as you alluded to, but I don't imagine the company would be interested in helping - and t
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00446.html (9,957 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:24:26 -0600
Ron, I have not had mine for years and years, either. In fact, I waited a long time for one reason or another to get one of these. When they first came out I went through quite a WOW factor experienc
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00451.html (13,950 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 01:03:16 -0600
I had to laugh at you final remark. A good friend of mine in Eagle, AK once gave me a really cool mil-surplus xtal cw transceiver. I asked him why he would just give me the rig he had coveted for so
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00461.html (11,129 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu