Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nn3w@cox.net: 154 ]

Total 154 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Categories (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:59:28 -0500
How much simpler could NAQP be? 100 watts and no multi-multi machines to contend with. I broke into the top 10 last year with a single OB16 at 80 feet one one tower and a C3E on second tower at 60 fe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00320.html (9,064 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Log Submissions (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:42:55 -0500
Just want to confirm though that if you sent an email log, it is still considered as properly submitted. Correct? Or do you want to extend the deadline for the submission of logs to the website? 73 R
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00350.html (8,264 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP and 75 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:22:51 -0500
Just like the N5 that was jamming me on 14.227 on Saturday - saying I was too close to the SSTV frequency. He demanded my callsign so that he could write a letter to the FCC, and then I asked his cal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00431.html (11,775 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP and 75 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:23:46 -0500
Umm...Who asked me about it? 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00432.html (10,647 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP and 75 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:00:46 -0500
Oh, I'm sorry. If somebody intentionally and maliciously interferes with my ongoing QSOs on what had been an open frequency - 3+ Kc away from the "usual" SSTV frequency - am I supposed to say "Thank
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00526.html (12,724 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Wires Only (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:32:41 -0500
This is all fine, but let us please eliminate the 10,000 plus categories that we seem to be coming up with in contests. WPX: TB Wires, Single Op, Low Power, 40 meters, assisted. YUCK! Too many catego
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00635.html (9,096 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP and 75 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:05:53 -0500
I just got done reading the ARRL's "white paper" on contest guidelines which according to W3LPL on the PVRC reflector was very recently released. Some interesting points - especially with respect to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00038.html (8,283 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sprint and SS in WRTC Rating System (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 04:37:35 -0400
If there is one thing that has annoyed me about the WRTC point scoring system is that folks have entered categories and scores for operations conducted outside of the region that they've entered as a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00042.html (10,515 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] 75M and the DX Window (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:30:42 -0500
community as there is within the Contesting community about the 'DX Window'. SSB, on 75m. Within that 250khz is a small, very small, segment 3790-3800 that US and most other countries have in common.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00075.html (9,731 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] 75M and the DX Window (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 00:14:36 -0500
True, but that 4% would hold three or four operating channels worth in a large contest. where ground. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00082.html (9,382 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx cw spot report (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:14:30 -0500
Speaking of spot report, I was more than amused at the "spots" that started to be posted on Sunday around 1800z...Calls like 6LQ6, 572B and C3PO showed up. Some folks got offended by it, but given th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00239.html (8,148 bytes)

12. Re: [ct-user] VP8DJK = South Shetlands, VP8/H (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:52:14 -0500
TO9A??? Maybe I was running an older version. -- Original Message -- From: "Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> To: <ct-user@contesting.com>; <na-user@contesting.com>; <trlog@contesting.com>;
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00241.html (9,322 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX SSB: 40m operation - and other musings (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:05:53 -0500
Here we go again. When you have a major contest as this during the low part of the cycle, it is nearly IMPOSSIBLE to contain several hundred stations into 60 kHz of space. Especially since 40 has bee
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00042.html (10,801 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spotting and YN4FD (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:03:10 -0500
Nope. Never heard him, and I ran south america on both 15 and 20 for a while. 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00208.html (8,400 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] wpx ssb spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 21:51:37 -0400
Speaking of spotting reports, I was doing a couple searches on DX-Summit to check on the times for a QSO I made with TY5WP, when, to my amazement I found that I had spotted no less than 30 or 40 stat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00043.html (24,336 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] Crowne Plaza room (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 21:38:54 -0400
Dayton is about a month off - I think I've got the clearance based on my work schedule to attend. Anybody know of an available room or available bed for a first-time pilgram to Dayton? 73 Rich NN3W _
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00132.html (6,476 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 x 2 callsigns (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:05:07 -0400
Or KC1XX which is a lenthgy CW call in comparison to most 2x1s and 1x2s prevalent SS (NE0P) seems _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00213.html (11,150 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 09:00:14 -0400
Very interesting points made by Mike. The League and its publication is supposed to be reponsive to its membership. Clearly, the membership felt that the utilization of 5 or 6 pages of numbers which
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00190.html (12,764 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 08:55:43 -0400
Oooh. That is an interesting thought. You can either receive QST with your ARRL membership or you can receive NCJ with your membership. That choice would be easy for me. 73 Rich NN3W ________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00195.html (8,106 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re MLA 2500 (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 21:15:37 -0400
IIRC VY2TT has a MLA2500 as the backup linear at the DX Lodge. 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00053.html (7,743 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu