Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nn4x@embarqmail.com: 76 ]

Total 76 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Movement of Magnetic North Pole (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:29:25 -0400
After reading this, I couldn't help but wonder what effect the movement of the may have already had on our contesting experiences, and how it'll affect us down the road? http://gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/geomag
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00409.html (6,612 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] The Cheating Thing (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:15:58 -0500 (EST)
Hi Everyone - It's been awhile since I've been QRV, but I went QRT after the hurricanes of 2004, and have slowly been getting things back together, and hope to be on the air soon. When the station is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00246.html (8,905 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Regarding Check Numbers... (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:53:16 -0500 (EST)
If we can chose the check number, wouldn't it make sense for everyone, on least on CW to chose "55"? In any event, it would be logical for everyone to use the same number. I'm pretty sure the reason
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00408.html (7,218 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Anyone Ever Notice... (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:45:09 -0500 (EST)
Anyone ever notice that the folks who win contests, contest-after-contest, year-after-year, don't seem to get too involved in these contest reflector pissing matches, arguing how many angels can danc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00077.html (7,238 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] 100 Years ago (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 12:54:55 -0400 (EDT)
Of course, it's not really "SOS", it's "dididitdahdahdahsididit" (it's its own character - no spaces) Just a trivial point from someone who's been spending the day at work copying and pasting trivial
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00002.html (7,806 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] cq-contest-lawyers mailing list! (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 22:23:55 -0400
Is there any interest in starting a mailing list for contesters who are wanna-be lawyers, and use their perceived legal talents to write/criticize/interpret contest rules endlessly? D'Oh! What am I s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00074.html (7,098 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Top Ten scores & 3830 postings? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 08:23:38 -0400
I see the cq-contest-lawyers are at it again. What is it with you people and the desire to monitor and measure every single aspect of our lives? Not posting to 3830 bothers some of you? "PISS OFF!" i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00004.html (7,904 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] The Winning Edge (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:43:04 -0500
Fascinating article at Psychology Today, with direct application for radio contesting. No doubt, the cq-contest-lawyers will not find it as enjoyable as speculating about just-in-time log submission,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00302.html (6,921 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:29:03 -0400
Chad - Please don't take this personally, but I think the attitude you express is part of why the world is in such trouble right now. IMO, we all must be our brother's keepers, to some extent. If I o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00054.html (9,734 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Time for a Contesting Wikipedia? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:34:07 -0400
If you go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki_software And scroll down to the bottom, you'll will find a list of wiki software products. I haven't reviewed them to see which is free, but I'll bet
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00055.html (8,885 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Borrowing Callsigns (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:29:57 -0400
Hi All If you don't have a Extra class license, can you 'borrow' an Extra class call, say for WPX? 73 Tom W7WHY -- Tom - As you know from the FCC's Part 97 rules, which cover the Amateur Radio Servic
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00109.html (7,161 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting rationale (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:09:23 -0400
Personally, I think we're supposed to use our Amateur gear to solicit/work contacts during contests. Self-spotting does an end-run around that, and partially negates all the hard, unfair work require
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00270.html (8,457 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Chairs (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 09:13:47 -0400
I would suggest going to a real office furniture store which offers professional/industrial grade products - not Office Max, Staples, Office Depot, etcetera. Chairs I've bought from them only lasted
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00066.html (9,581 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:58:54 -0400
So, since relying on "honesty and integrity" has proven to be insufficient, it's the threat of an inspection to keep people playing by the rules, or else we just give up. I vote for the threat of ins
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00166.html (8,823 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:31:40 -0400
Joe - I understand what you're saying, but it's not a great argument. First the amplifier reviews I read (on eHam.net, in case anyone was wondering) where talking about amps running 4K + output, some
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00191.html (11,071 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 23:42:15 -0400
People don't seem too put off by amateur events like "The Olympics", or "The Little League World Series". ;-) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00201.html (10,047 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:04:01 -0400
Hi Chuck - I don't think there's any disconnect in comparing elite amateur athletes of any kind kind against elite radiosport competitors. Anyone can participate in events which would allow them to q
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00216.html (9,482 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:10:57 -0400
Well...they're not "random" - the competitor would be warned that there may be a visit. If they're KNOWN cheaters, why not make an effort to eradicate them, or put them on the path of playing by the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00217.html (9,406 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] Those dBs in a pileup (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:34:49 -0400
Dave - I *seem* to recall that, a long time ago, someone smart like K3ZO or W3LPL or someone did an analysis of what the effect would be if you were 1 dB stronger than everyone else in a pile-up. IIR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00220.html (10,731 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections->Hijacked Thread (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:59:34 -0400
OK...not that I claim to be a cq-contest-lawyer or anything, but just to clarify - Kelly - U.S. Constitution and its Amendments are with respect to the Government controlling its citizens - i.e. the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00278.html (10,428 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu