Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nn5t@attglobal.net: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Multi (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Suehiro" <nn5t@attglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 19:55:15 -0500
Dear contesting OM, personally I am always SO and never even tried SO2R. In 80s and 90s, I had operated from MM / Multi-2 and I thought I understand the setup rules. In last few years in Club FD and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-02/msg00055.html (8,269 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi-Multi (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Suehiro" <nn5t@attglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 09:58:00 -0500
Thanks, I may need to study about the stubs. 73 de Jon NN5T --Original Message-- From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces+nn5t=attglobal.net@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown Sent: February 5
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-02/msg00076.html (8,089 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 3 and 4 letter contesting callsigns (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Suehiro" <nn5t@attglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 23:26:24 -0500
Sorry like my wimpy signal that needed to repeat the call several times. I went through the phase -- 'C5?' in many years. Adding a space 'n^n^5^t' did not help much. Now we are having the similar fee
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-02/msg00145.html (10,782 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8/FT4 duplicates in FD? (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Suehiro" <nn5t@attglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 14:31:03 -0500
Phone QSO count as one credit, CW is one and all other Digital is one. So if you work the station already on FT8, another call on FT4 is DUPE. -- 6.3. Field Day contacts are allowed using Phone, CW a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00200.html (10,080 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] New RTTY sub-bands in JA (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Suehiro" <nn5t@attglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:07:19 -0500
FYI: 3500 - 3520 CW 3520 - 3535 Narrow band data 3535 - 3575 CW, Narrow band phone and image, Narrow band data (Overseas only) 3575 - 3580 Narrow band all modes 3599 - 3612 Narrow band all modes 3662
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-09/msg00049.html (8,700 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best CW contest rig (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Suehiro" <nn5t@attglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 19:02:17 -0500
Maybe as a top of best CW contest rig priority, please consider 'clean CW' without clicking. 73 Jon NN5T _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-09/msg00066.html (7,594 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best CW contest rig (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Suehiro" <nn5t@attglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:06:51 -0500
A year ago, I switched my 7610 with 890. 7610 band scope is sooooo good, I can read CW without tuning. Assisted without Skimmer, hi ? Jon NN5T I had two FTdx-9000D rigs in my shack in May 2019 when a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-09/msg00080.html (18,707 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Key Clicks.... Continuing Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Suehiro" <nn5t@attglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:04:03 -0500
Very simple idea. All exchanges with RST, if you hear Key Click - send 599K or even 595K. If you get 'k' more than like 10% of exchange, you may be disqualified or lose score. NN5T Jon I appreciate t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00089.html (23,385 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW is a Great Contest -- NOT(?) (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Suehiro" <nn5t@attglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 23:36:59 -0500
Just one comment. In '70's and '80's, the map was totally different. From Texas, we could conquer both EU and JA (and of course many U-zones with QRH and chirp) to win the world. Seems JA's activity
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00071.html (7,644 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] In Band or Out Of Band (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Suehiro" <nn5t@attglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 20:28:15 -0500
That's in band, unless splattering or leaking toward LSB side. The issue was VE (or DX) was calling CQ test on 7.127 and W's are piling up. VE should not be answering those calls on top of W need to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00118.html (8,702 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] In Band or Out Of Band (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Suehiro" <nn5t@attglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 22:01:31 -0500
As a favor and many can avoid unnecessary O O, please move all the way and not right at the 7.126 or 14.144. Thank you. --Original Message-- From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+nn5t=attglobal.net@co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00142.html (9,530 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL to allow self-spotting in contests (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Suehiro" <nn5t@attglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 16:42:09 -0500
Like me a city small station with dipole and vertical, spot from big guns in both coast does not help at all. So I have been staying in Low Power - non assisted. CQ-ing is not effective, so my contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-02/msg00084.html (12,288 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Final 2023 CQ WW SSB Scores Available (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Suehiro" <nn5t@attglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 22:02:38 -0500
Is there any reason some certificate title is 2023 CQ WORLD-WIDE DX CONTEST PH and others are 2023 CQ WORLD-WIDE DX CONTEST SSB ? _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00020.html (8,199 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Final 2023 CQ WW SSB Scores Available (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Suehiro" <nn5t@attglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 08:34:06 -0500
Thanks Randy. Re-down loaded mine, and now says SSB. 73 OM _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00025.html (8,242 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu