Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:noddy1211@sbcglobal.net: 364 ]

Total 364 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] UV Resistant Ty-Wraps? (score: 1)
Author: "shack" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:26:27 -0700
I see that good old Harbor Freight has stainless Steel tie wraps; they would definitely be UV proof. I picked a pack up to try some; the only problem may be sharp edges. Mike K6BR --Original Message-
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00663.html (8,636 bytes)

42. Re: [TowerTalk] UV Resistant Ty-Wraps? (score: 1)
Author: "shack" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:17:06 -0700
Jim, $4.00 and a few cents for a bunch of them at Harbor freight, I think and am not sure, but they are re-usable. There looks to be at least 10 in a pack, I am in Salt Lake City and not at home in N
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00672.html (10,875 bytes)

43. Re: [TowerTalk] UV Resistant Ty-Wraps? (score: 1)
Author: "shack" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:22:34 -0700
Dave, thanks for the link. Just saw your post after mine hi hi. When I looked at them they looked to be removable and re-usable with a screwdriver tip. I will check when I get home, but defiantly a f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00673.html (9,496 bytes)

44. Re: [TowerTalk] Magnetic North (score: 1)
Author: "Noddy" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:37:13 -0700
I like the alternate reference, especially the comments from visitors. So, it looks like this Sun Spot cycle will be the one to change the poles, I guess I will have to point the beam north to work V
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00241.html (9,321 bytes)

45. Re: [TowerTalk] Magnetic North (score: 1)
Author: "Noddy" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 19:21:57 -0700
No, it will be easier as it will be South Dakota then. --Original Message-- North Dakota will then be even harder to work in the Sweepstakes. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00248.html (10,942 bytes)

46. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommendation for heat gun for shrink wrap (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:32:47 -0700
Good old Harbor Freight has 1500 watt unit for about 10 bucks, and it works real well. Mike --Original Message-- Hi folks.............any recommendation for a good heat gun to be used for shrink wrap
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00624.html (8,507 bytes)

47. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommendation for heat gun for shrink wrap (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:49:17 -0700
I guess I should have given you the link. http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/displayitem.taf?Itemnumber=35776 On sale for $9.99 right now, I have used the heck out of one for work to melt hot glue
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00626.html (9,598 bytes)

48. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommendation for heat gun for shrink wrap (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:55:55 -0700
http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/displayitem.taf?Itemnumber=96289 Sorry for extra mail, this was the one I was thinking of, but the $9.99 1kw version will be all you need actually. Mike K6BR I g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00627.html (9,973 bytes)

49. Re: [TowerTalk] Crank Up towers (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 13:13:24 -0700
Jim, I have done this with my MA-40 tubular with 10 mast, 3 element Steppir and no rotator (rotator at the base) and it is definitely a seat of the pants experience definitely not to be done on a reg
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00013.html (11,463 bytes)

50. Re: [TowerTalk] permit in hand (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 18:33:58 -0700
A nice inspirational read, thanks Karl. Mike --Original Message-- Back in 1990-91, after moving to this QTH on a hilltop in the woods I started erecting the tower farm on 5 acres. As written I interp
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00023.html (14,145 bytes)

51. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:11:45 -0700
I am not sure that the any auto tuner will tune a Windom, I have Carolina Windom 160 and have SWR's around 8:1 on some frequencies. Mike --Original Message-- Hi! I'm very interested in the RadioWorks
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00202.html (7,376 bytes)

52. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:23:46 -0700
I did not say I was happy with it Bill, the SWR on mine runs about 3:1, but never below 2.5:1, even though this is the case the feed line losses are still pretty low even at 2.5:1 with a Windom or so
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00203.html (9,604 bytes)

53. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:13:12 -0700
Dave, you are correct if you read my other comments in the thread you will see that I am in agreement and that the losses are very low even with a high SWR with a Carolina Windom. It is not a Dipole
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00206.html (11,849 bytes)

54. Re: [TowerTalk] Chemical ground rods (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 19:52:09 -0700
Looks like good old Bentonite --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of bill rubin Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 7:16 PM To
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00565.html (8,249 bytes)

55. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommendations needed for 440 Repeater Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:16:14 -0700
I got lucky with my MTR-2000 440 repeater, we are tied in to and using the shared array on a commercial tower and it works very well, I could find out what the antennas are if you are interested. I w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00660.html (10,134 bytes)

56. Re: [TowerTalk] Age Old Question (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:56:49 -0700
Use the Stainless Steel cable ties from Harbor Freight, they are cheap and work just fine. Mike --Original Message-- Bill, W5VX I like insulated solid core 14 gauge wire.... -- Original Message -- Fr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00693.html (8,804 bytes)

57. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:12:22 -0700
Your 100% correct Bert. Steppir who actually do have an advanced state of the art antenna have all their nice color manuals on their website as stated before. Plus their customer service in my opinio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00712.html (11,083 bytes)

58. Re: [TowerTalk] DXpedition Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:28:29 -0700
I would say the two element Steppir, it is very easy to set up, it seems many DXpeditions use them now for that reason, plus all bands 20 thru 6. Unless you have one in your hands now, you will not g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00835.html (7,950 bytes)

59. Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259's (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:22:11 -0700
It all depends how serious you are I guess, most 144/440 operators I have bumped into recently have never heard of N types. I would use them at least for 6 meters and above. Actually, as I got a bunc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00234.html (9,042 bytes)

60. Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259's can be installed correctly in 5 minutes (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:59:31 -0700
I thought that the internal thread was to facilitate the use of a threaded reducer for smaller cable e.g. RG-58 etc. Mike --Original Message-- There's a problem with the fourth step below: You don't
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00250.html (8,662 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu