Mail Archive Search: <+from:nx4d@gate.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:nx4d@gate.net: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Lightning solution (score: 1): Author: nx4d@gate.net (DOUG WALLER); Date: Wed, 03 Jun 1998 12:17:32 -0400; Very good Barry, I really liked some of your points. Think some of them were TIC, but here is my Lightning anti-strike theory: Sometime back I visited shack of NS5M, whereby I saw a huge knife switch; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00096.html (12,381 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] GAIN - TX VS. RX (score: 1): Author: nx4d@gate.net (DOUG WALLER); Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 12:06:45 -0400; G/M: SINCE BEAM GAIN VARIES SO WIDELY REL TO FREQ, AS SEEN FROM RECENTLY POSTED TABLES HERE, I STARTED PONDERING VARIATION OF GAIN ON TRANSMIT VS. RECEIVE. IN HIS BOOK "HF ANTS FOR ALL LOCS", MOXON S; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00986.html (7,957 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] The solution for torque relief on BX towers (score: 1): Author: nx4d@gate.net (DOUG WALLER); Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 21:42:02 -0500; GUYS, ITS LATE, BUT IM TRYING TO REMEMBER AN "INVENTION" I HEARD OF RECENTLY. THE SHORT MAST WAS FITTED WITH A SPRINGLOADED FLEX JOINT THAT ABSORBED TORQUE PEAKS UPON BEGINNING & STOPPING ROTATION. S; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00109.html (9,116 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Hazer cable failure (score: 1): Author: nx4d@gate.net (DOUG WALLER); Date: Sat, 07 Feb 1998 10:35:11 -0500; OM STAN, MY HAZER HAS A SAFETY CATCH THAT IT RESTS ON TO PREVENT SUCH SHOULD THE CABLE BREAK. I DID HAVE MY SLACK COAX AT TOP ALMOST LOOP OVER THE TOWER, WHICH WUD HAVE PREVENTED LOWERING. SOMEONE US; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00232.html (8,595 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]