Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ny6p01@gmail.com: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] New Jupiter on its Way _ A Few Questions (score: 1)
Author: ny6p01@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 13:52:32 -0700
Yes, Rick. my bad. I noticed that the Wellbrook was over 5 feet in diameter too large for indoor application. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00556.html (11,301 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] New Jupiter on its Way _ A Few Questions (score: 1)
Author: ny6p01@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 14:05:49 -0700
Well, that's a generous offer, JHR. I am tempted to take you up on it. Only problem is that I plan on employing it on the same mast with the transmitting antenna. Is that bad practice? The reason is
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00559.html (11,830 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] New Jupiter on its Way _ A Few Questions (score: 1)
Author: ny6p01@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 17:39:24 -0700
Would a dual position coax switch take care of all this? Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00573.html (10,591 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] New Jupiter on its Way _ A Few Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Rockinghorse Winner (Terry)" <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 20:02:17 -0700
I do know some guys use a time sequencer and/or an automatic receive antenna switch to kill the receiver preamp or isolate the receiver antenna when transmitting, but I would have to research them fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00579.html (14,713 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] New Jupiter on its Way _ A Few Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Rockinghorse Winner (Terry)" <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 20:08:51 -0700
A receiving loop has its advantages with directional properties. That is about the only good thing I can find about loops unless they are larger than 1/2 wave physically. I realize we all do not have
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00581.html (15,494 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] New Jupiter on its Way _ A Few Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Rockinghorse Winner (Terry)" <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 20:12:21 -0700
I will prolly have to get a tx/rx automatic switch, like the one DXE sells, to protect myself from this eventuality. 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) On 4/27/2014 5:05 PM, ny6p01@gmail.com wr
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00582.html (12,540 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] (ham station computer choice) (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 14:22:54 -0700
I would second that motion, Kimberly, and recommend in addition that one build their own OS from the ground up - and for the same reasons. No, you don't have to be a coder - there are several brands
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00089.html (11,475 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] TenTec / RF Concepts (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 14:52:43 -0700
One of my concerns is whether the primary shareholders of either co. cashed out. The statement says that the new entity will be called RF Concepts. I don't know of this has a bearing on whether the T
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00207.html (8,208 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 16:24:47 -0700
Good advice all. The problem with ef I had to battle with my ts480 (2nd floor apt, floating rf ground), was the unshielded CAT5 cable that connected the head unit to the main chassis. I have zero rf
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00310.html (12,430 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Questions (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 06:56:15 -0700
I recently traded in my Kenwood TS 480 for a Jupiter. while I can't comment on the specifics which you asked about, I will say that the received audio on the Jupiter appears to me to be far superior
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00469.html (9,409 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Fw: Alpha Amplifiers and TEN-TEC Merge (score: 1)
Author: ny6p01@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 17:09:29 -0700
Lets not forget that low tax states do not have to be in the deep south. Texas, Arizona, Nevada, New Hampshire are all in the same camp, afaik. Lee <NY6P> ____________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00476.html (9,274 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1)
Author: ny6p01@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 18:12:33 -0700
I agree: the Eagle would be incredibly attractive to me in a larger form factor. As it is, I 'almost' pulled the lever for one, due to the acknowledged refinement of it's receiver circuitry, but went
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00646.html (10,786 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec custom enclosures comment... (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 14:39:54 -0700
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00689.html (11,003 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] Chinese Amps (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 18:59:40 -0700
Just thought I'd chime in to say that Chinese quality has come a long way, and has a long way to go. This is a general statement: in specific cases, the quality is exemplary. All economies fixate on
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00759.html (9,340 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Estate Sale - Ten Tec Titan 425 For Sale (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:20:51 -0700
add me also to the list thank you _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-06/msg00116.html (10,482 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] TT Mega Sale (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:32:57 -0700
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00043.html (11,762 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S SPLIT (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 07:17:41 -0700
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00239.html (9,545 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:52:30 -0700
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00840.html (10,157 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] New Radios in the Future (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 10:06:32 -0800
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-11/msg00035.html (12,551 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] CQ SS & the Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 19:53:17 -0800
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-11/msg00201.html (11,664 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu