Mail Archive Search: <+from:paul@n1bug.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:paul@n1bug.net: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: ARRL (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:37:25 -0500; I have to disagree, in part. Here in the northeast, on good propagation nights there is often a DX station every few hundred hertz from 1810 up to wherever the SSB totally takes over. Inevitably on; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00049.html (7,527 bytes)
2. Topband: condx (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:35:40 -0500; After several weeks of very poor conditions, last night was much better but somewhat unusual. I got 4 new ones in the log! Signals appeared to be arriving at high angle. For the first time this seaso; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00322.html (7,280 bytes)
3. Topband: Update: RFI to DSL modem (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:48:03 -0500; Several people asked for a summary of my findings, so here it is. My DSL modem reports S/N 30 dB so I have a reasonable DSL signal. 50 watts on 160m causes the modem to lose sync. I have tried the fo; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00262.html (7,765 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Technology "QSO's" (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>(by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:32:40 -0500; *Many* VHF folks, and it is part of the reason I gave up and came back to top band. Too many "QSOs" involve some RF being sprayed into space along with minute by minute two-way internet/cluster exch; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00154.html (9,402 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Self Spotting and Icebergs (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:03:08 -0500; Interesting. Possibly it's not always a case of those stations trying to falsely claim a QSO? I had a distressing thing happen last season... I was in a pile calling A45XR, not altogether successfull; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00136.html (7,398 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: An Admission (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 16:38:24 -0500; I apologize if this is getting too far off topic. This will be my one and only post on this subject. I don't make a practice of it but I have done it a couple of times for a different reason. For exa; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00110.html (8,904 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: CQ WW Contest (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:31:19 -0500; It is often very difficult to work EU during the SSB contests even from here in the northeast. Many EU's who were S9+ this weekend could not be worked. I think it's more a question of QRM/splatter ov; /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00333.html (7,850 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: Beverage Ant question (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:14:47 -0400; I am no expert on such matters but can offer a comment based on my own experience: I have several 500 to 600 foot Beverages in different directions. They are in a low-lying area alongside a river th; /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00244.html (7,261 bytes)
9. Topband: 160m vs DSL modem (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:35:43 -0400; Fellow topbanders, I know this is not a new subject but I would appreciate any suggestions you may have. I did quite a bit of web searching before posting here, but didn't come up with much. Please r; /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00200.html (7,297 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: AWESOME VK6 conditions/LP NA (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:41:59 -0400; I had just switched on and Steve was a solid 579 10 minutes before my sunset. He was probably workable much earlier had I been there. He was just starting to fade, 569, when he went QRT about 2203. A; /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00120.html (7,545 bytes)
11. Topband: Better condx (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:54:52 -0400; Things improved last night. V51AS was solid copy near his SR (and begging for callers). K7C was copyable this morning, if not workable... the first time for some of us northerners who have been strug; /archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00101.html (6,724 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: OJ0 (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:20:22 -0400; Congrats to those NA who worked him last night! He was 449 at best here, but only for less than a minute at a time. Most of the time he ranged from nothing to 229. QRN was not a factor at this locat; /archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00156.html (7,096 bytes)
13. Topband: correction (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 08:34:44 -0400; Obviously that is not correct. 5Z4DZ peaked just after 0300z. Sorry about that. Paul N1BUG _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.con; /archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00127.html (6,730 bytes)
14. Topband: last night (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 07:41:37 -0400; I have been mostly hiding in the shadows the last few weeks, keeping a watch for new ones. Some nights QRN has been too high to hear much. Seems like when we get quiet(er) nights the propagation has; /archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00125.html (7,433 bytes)
15. Topband: FT5XO and 5Z4DZ last night (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 06:56:10 -0500; Congrats to all who got FT5XO in the log last night! Propagation was very different from all other days so far during the expedition. My SS was 2259z. FT5XO was already solid copy at 2240 when I got; /archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00230.html (7,214 bytes)
16. Topband: the amazing band (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 06:20:16 -0500; It has been a great weak for this little station. Earlier this week I managed to snag VQ9LA on a truly remarkable SS peak. 8R1RPN, certainly not rare, was nevertheless new for me. Then last night the; /archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00216.html (7,711 bytes)
17. Topband: Current cdx & DX; also aurora vs 160m (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 06:32:23 -0500; Friday morning it was fascinating to see DU9/N0NM pop out of the noise for about 3 minutes. What surprised me was how quickly Jon went from a mere trace to solid 559 (about 15 seconds!) and then drop; /archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00200.html (8,154 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: Top-band Prop along grayline (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 07:35:22 -0500; Ayuh! For my FN55MF location in central Maine I calculate 68 minutes for JA3, 77 minutes for JA5, and 79 minutes for JA6 (I am assuming my software correctly identifies the JA call areas -- in any ca; /archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00120.html (7,141 bytes)
19. Topband: JA and VK6 (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:43:43 -0500; Thanks to Kaz, JA8ISU I have just worked my firt JA on top band! It seemed to be a skew path, as signals were about equal on the west and southwest Beverages. Sorry I did not hear the JH2 (JH2FXK?) w; /archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00113.html (7,202 bytes)
20. Topband: JA (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 06:31:25 -0500; I was very surprised to hear JA8ISU with 559 signal this morning as he worked P40W !!! With very disturbed conditions that was the last thing I expected !! I tried to arrange a sked with JA8ISU via t; /archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00092.html (6,993 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]