Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:paulc@mediaone.net: 204 ]

Total 204 documents matching your query.

141. [TenTec] OMNI VI filter bypassing? (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 10:30:41 -0500
Hi Clark, I'm awaiting my 2.8 K filter. From your first impression, it appears the filter has corrected the LSB/USB passband asymmetry problem. As you pointed out, the impetus for the change was to c
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00365.html (10,206 bytes)

142. [TenTec] Re: 2.4khz 9mhz pri INRAD Filters (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 09:26:42 -0500
Bill, My only concern with a 10-pole filter in the 9 MHz slot is that the CW transmit BFO frequency of 9,000.400 kHz *must* fall within the flat and linear portion of the lower filter skirt. If this
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00409.html (9,630 bytes)

143. [TenTec] Re: 2.4khz 9mhz pri INRAD Filters (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 10:15:47 -0500
Clarification: I realized that Bill's message was not transceiver-specific. My preceding message applies only to the Omni Six/Six Plus, not previous OMNIs whose filters may be compatible in the 9 MHz
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00411.html (9,776 bytes)

144. [TenTec] Re: 2.4khz 9mhz pri INRAD Filters (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 21:09:41 -0500
Bill, Can you elaborate on your BFO mods and what values/part types you used to improve temperature stability? At one time I had considered replacing the majority of BFO trimmer caps with subminiatur
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00421.html (10,323 bytes)

145. [TenTec] Re: 2.4khz 9mhz pri INRAD Filters (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 19:18:58 -0500
Thanks for the detailed reply Bill. You've spent as much time with this circuit as I have! Only, my focus has been on changes to the BFO switching circuit, rather than on BFO stability. I have presen
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00439.html (14,939 bytes)

146. [TenTec] OMNI VI deafness (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 23:06:28 -0500
Clark, I would first suspect one of the three 1N4007 quasi-PIN diodes in the T/R circuit. I replaced mine with Microsemi UM-2110 1KV true PIN diodes made specifically for high power H.F. transmit swi
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00138.html (8,919 bytes)

147. [TenTec] OMNI VI deafness (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 23:13:20 -0500
I just saw your end note relating to the aux port. I would still try isolating that part of the circuit by testing the circuit with the antenna closer to the 20 dB attenuator stage. Of course, you ca
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00139.html (9,876 bytes)

148. [TenTec] Re; Omni VI Deafness (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 07:53:33 -0500
I've had several requests to provide additional information on the Microsemi UM2110 PIN diodes. Here's the URL pointing to the UM-2110 data sheet: http://www.microsemi.com/corporate/catalog/partoverv
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00140.html (8,426 bytes)

149. [TenTec] Ten Tec Cure for Clicking Omni 6 a No Go (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 10:29:46 -0500
Dale, Have you tried disconnecting plug 52 on the IF/AF Circuit Board? My Omni had the same problem and after bypassing the sidetone "wraparound" circuit, the problem went away completely. If you hav
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00251.html (11,216 bytes)

150. [TenTec] Ten Tec Cure for Clicking Omni 6 a No Go (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 11:16:26 -0500
Many others have reported that this has fixed their Omni Six's clicking problem. Don't let John's remarks discourage you from at least trying the disconnection of plug 52. You've got nothing to lose
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00254.html (11,091 bytes)

151. [TenTec] Ten Tec Cure for Clicking Omni 6 a No Go (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 17:05:10 -0500
Steve, Disconnecting connector 52 actually improves the QSK turnaround time because the CMOS 4066 quad-bilateral switch is bypassed. However, the more I hear of this problem, the more I'm inclined t
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00271.html (9,086 bytes)

152. [TenTec] Calling all Omni Six Owners (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 09:15:48 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0078_01BDF1D3.12A468C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Those of you who have a
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-10/msg00050.html (19,124 bytes)

153. [TenTec] Re: Marking Mods (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 17:00:20 -0400
Placing the unit's serial number in the owner's manual along with the modification & maintenance documentation will also help to match the mods to a specific piece of equipment. On schematics, I gene
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-10/msg00070.html (8,445 bytes)

154. [TenTec] Model 301 Remote Control Tuning Knob (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 16:52:48 -0400
It's hard to believe there isn't enough of a demand for the return of this product given the fact that within the past week, two of them sold on eBay; one for $200 and incredibly one sold yesterday f
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-10/msg00191.html (7,445 bytes)

155. [TenTec] Re: [CW] Kachina vs. Omni VI+ (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1998 21:15:42 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0225_01BDD9DB.81790860 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Since I own the Kachina 5
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00096.html (24,924 bytes)

156. [TenTec] Re: Omni VI+ QSK Thump and Click Mod (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1998 08:28:01 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_007A_01BDDA39.6D626D40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There were far too many r
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00101.html (31,066 bytes)

157. [TenTec] Mid range T-T (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 10:20:48 -0400
the 'bells and whiltles' I agree. Take a look at the handheld market. Why on earth does it seem that every ham would accept the ability to make his HT into a "scanner" than have much improved interm
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00240.html (7,995 bytes)

158. [TenTec] Omni and 87A (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 08:38:39 -0400
Even though the Omni 6 and 6+ employs a relay to key an external amplifier, it is possible to completely eliminate the noisy relay when using the Omni with most modern amplifiers. Internally, the Omn
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00330.html (12,916 bytes)

159. [TenTec] Omni QSK with Alpha's 87A QSK (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 17:58:53 -0400
I agree that there's nothing stooping hams from being inventive even with the new, modern generation of transceivers. I believe that the amplifier interface confusion is the result of Ten-Tec's progr
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00338.html (18,194 bytes)

160. [TenTec] Omni QSK with Alpha's 87A QSK (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 18:52:53 -0400
Jim: I'm not sure my messages are making it to you through the reflector. With one simple mod to the Omni Six's Control Board, you can accomplish your goal. This is my third post relating to this tod
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00341.html (14,030 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu