Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:pehaire@comcast.net: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Homebrew Crank-up (score: 1)
Author: "pehaire" <pehaire@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:41:42 -0500
I am jumping into the middle of a thread because I have lost several e-mails. I don't know if this will help. In the 1960 issue of Orr's Beam Antenna Handbook on page 66 are some photos of W6YMD's 11
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-03/msg00562.html (10,928 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical with 1 radia (score: 1)
Author: "pehaire" <pehaire@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 17:49:32 -0500
The true test would be have the other end of the contact on the land line and test with him over maybe a 10,000 mile path or the path one is interested in Since a contact is 95 percent propogation a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00211.html (11,433 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical with 1 radia (score: 1)
Author: "pehaire" <pehaire@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 09:14:28 -0500
Do you recall the Gotham beams? They produced full size yagis. I had a 20 meter 3 el on a 24 foot boom. I added 4 feet to the original 20 foot boom. As a kid this was my first experience with antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00226.html (10,999 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical with 1 radia (score: 1)
Author: "pehaire" <pehaire@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 17:05:35 -0500
I agree. I learn more by listening than talking. That is why it is rare for me to post a message. But we can use our abilities and imaginations to create or make additions and modifications to improv
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00242.html (14,143 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical with 1 radia (score: 1)
Author: "pehaire" <pehaire@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 14:13:25 -0500
I do not know how I got into this. I guess I am not making myself clear. All I am saying is that a good operator at 3DA0 and 4S7 (12,000 miles) can hear my 50 watts and shunt fed tower with radials o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00294.html (14,037 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical with 1 radia (score: 1)
Author: "pehaire" <pehaire@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 09:58:26 -0500
I agree with you. I was thinking of a hands on method of testing the original question. How would a vertical with one radial perform. My idea was to extablish contact (propagation) with a distant poi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00302.html (14,481 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Fw: Why radials improve radiation! (score: 1)
Author: "pehaire" <pehaire@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 15:10:21 -0500
What about an end fed Zepp? Fed with open wire. I have read that it thinks there is an immaginary 1/4 wave section where the feeder is terminate at a dead or insulator point. I know this is a high im
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00387.html (13,222 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Why radials improve radiation! (score: 1)
Author: "pehaire" <pehaire@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 20:54:05 -0500
Good point. I once saw a diagram of a J or zepp that was bent 90 degrees at the junction of the quarter wave and the half wave. He was using it as a vertical. ________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00395.html (9,134 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Another Ground Radial Question (score: 1)
Author: "pehaire" <pehaire@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 09:08:57 -0500
I agree with you. It looks like to me that a half square could be thought of as 2 verticals each with one radial and the 2 radials attached or bonded together at their ends. Thus 2 verticals spaced a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00401.html (13,750 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu