Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:pfizenmayer@qwest.net: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Orion] test (score: 1)
Author: "Pfizenmayer" <pfizenmayer@qwest.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 00:02:39 -0700
test message to make sure my new email got changed globally _______________________________________________ Orion mailing list Orion@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/orion
/archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00069.html (6,344 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] mounting (UHF) RF powermodules (score: 1)
Author: "pfizenmayer" <pfizenmayer@qwest.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:44:56 -0700
Forgot to mention , If you cannot find the EB's I can scan them out of an old MOT data book DL110. Carel , If this module is a ceramic substrate or even a soft substarte with smll ceramic carriers ,
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00222.html (8,115 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Minimum Value of RF Plate Chokes (score: 1)
Author: "pfizenmayer" <pfizenmayer@qwest.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:42:32 -0700
Hmmmmnnnn- This all got my curiosity up enough to grab my reactance rule and see what is going on . If we use a 200 uhy choke at 160 meters - 1.8 mhz - its reactance is 2262 ohms, A capacitor that pa
/archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00690.html (11,599 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Minimum Value of RF Plate Chokes (score: 1)
Author: "pfizenmayer" <pfizenmayer@qwest.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:51:20 -0700
CORRECTION _ The RF current thru the choke is 2000/2262 or more like 880 ma NOT 8.8 ma. Thanks to Peter G3ZRP for catching this. NO excuse - it did not sound right or pass what my old boss used to ca
/archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00697.html (9,358 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu