Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:prickler.schneider@t-online.de: 208 ]

Total 208 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration and Support (score: 1)
Author: prickler.schneider@t-online.de
Date: 10 Aug 2005 08:35 GMT
Another two cents by a small pistol (the group that won´t discuss about plaques, but builds the numbers in the competition between contests). First BIG THANKS to 5B4AGN and W6WRT, who reminded
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00218.html (9,427 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] logging & issues (score: 1)
Author: prickler.schneider@t-online.de
Date: 26 Oct 2005 11:29 GMT
Hello, just to get it straight: what would happen to my entry when I logged the KH6 with zone 22, K1xxx with zone 14 and all other qsos with a "wrong" zone, too? Would it even be possible to win a wa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00570.html (7,991 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] WWSSB - the corruptive influence of packet (score: 1)
Author: prickler.schneider@t-online.de
Date: 03 Nov 2005 12:20 GMT
Perhaps are busted Calls in spots a good way to get some facts. A comparison with the logs may give a hint how many trust and log directly only from the spots - at least with a relevant number of bus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00119.html (7,332 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] QRPers --- Please QRQ (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:33:00 +0100
de dl8mbs/mostly qrp Hello Hans et al, from my experience qrq isn&acute;t generally better. In the qsb-case qrq is favourable as well as on a not too crowded 80 or 20m-band with a good signal strengt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00309.html (10,237 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Competitor friendly contesting (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:23:04 +0100
Hi, with the goal to get as many participants and as happy as possible why not compare to running events: surely they have the marathon as most important category. But nearly all organizers add half-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00482.html (9,596 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Competitor friendly contesting (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 00:15:50 +0100
Hello Kirk et al, I feel a misunderstanding about "competitor friendly contesting". It should not be about more wallpapers or watering down. My point is the better adaptation of contesting to the rea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00528.html (10,968 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] 24 hour contest (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:14:26 +0100
Hello Doug et al., about your posting with exchange emails or, as in the olde days, do on the air! >You can contact those with whom you want to compete in a same somehow limited category. That sounds
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00556.html (9,181 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Competitor friendly Contesting - BARTG (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 17:08:53 +0100
Hello, interesting offer by BARTG in their 48-hours RTTY-spring contest: SOAB6 Single Operator All Band 6 hour. Entrants in this class must enter a log for the first 6 hours of their contest operatio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00673.html (6,919 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] QRP - Get Over It (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:53:41 +0100
Hello, I&acute;m not too familiar with the US buro service. But I wonder about the possible problem in answering foreign (not domestic) QSL cards via the buro. I can&acute;t imagine it as a money pro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00070.html (8,765 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] How long do we go? (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:46:37 +0100
Hello, after the thread "Competitor friendly contesting", started in November 05 by Steve (ZC4LI), I looked for infos about operating time of contesters and found that RDXC calculates the operation t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00110.html (9,945 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] "National competion" in IARU-contest (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:08:20 +0200
Hello, a small idea about the "national competition" in IARU-contest with its intention to stimulate as much activity as possible which means at least medium-guns, too: Why not building the "national
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00251.html (8,641 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Operation times in RDXC (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 01:02:20 +0200
Hello, for those interested in the activity time of contesters here another count through the times given by Russian DX Contest based on the claimed scores list for the 2006 event. There were 936 non
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00290.html (7,564 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU (score: 1)
Author: "DL8MBS" <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:23:20 +0200
Just for the record I have to disagree with opinions like "Penalties for inaccuracy only punish the inaccurate, which is the way it should be" or "If you are not in the other guy&acute;s log, then yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00531.html (9,504 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] spot-analysis (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 08:26:12 +0200
Some opposition against statistic methods argues that they may not deliver 110 percent proof. IMHO it could be eased if we had different penalties like every real sport. Soccer or football games were
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00102.html (7,969 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] A New Perspective [was:WRTC Spot/Log Correlation] (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 23:52:01 +0200
And how about the operation time also mentioned? About two thirds of the logsending participants operate less than halftime, about three quarters less than two thirds of the possible time. They/we ar
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00120.html (11,230 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Dit-Dit (was Sending Speed) (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:13:57 +0200
May be not true in all cases. During this years`s WPX CW I operated qrp and had quite a few stations terminating the efforts to establish an exchange by simply starting another CQ (after my last tran
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00250.html (8,058 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting Extinction (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:34:27 +0200
But they do it in a public competition. If it were only for personal goals they could take any 42km and run against the clock. But they want to be competetive in a broader sense - they want the compa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00104.html (12,095 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] need resource for journalist (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:27:10 +0200
Hello Derrick, as one from this strange writing profession may I ask, please don&acute;t try overload and overkill attacking him with specialities (as seen from non-ham readers) like SO2R. Try to fin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00534.html (8,767 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:20:47 +0100
Every organizer is free to make the "gentlemen&acute;s agreement" part of the rules as some already do. Every organizer is also free to enforce this by penalties of his choice published in the rules,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00592.html (10,068 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:56:18 +0100
So please go ahead and do it everytime on any day and discuss it with the ones to come to talk to you about it - even during weekdays the "holes" in the CW portion will be better than in the SSB part
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00713.html (10,765 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu