Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:radioconnection@gmail.com: 185 ]

Total 185 documents matching your query.

81. [TenTec] Omni VI excessive band-pass tuning authority? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:04:18 -0500
I've noticed that the Band pass tuning range on my Omni VI and Paragon II seems to be far larger than it needs to be--the actual useful tuning range seems to be about 1/4 of the available control rot
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-02/msg00007.html (7,821 bytes)

82. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI excessive band-pass tuning authority? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 12:56:06 -0500
I guess I am the only one who has noticed this on the Omni VI? I guess I'll dig into it and see what I can do to fix what is apparently an issue that only bothers me :) Pete _________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-02/msg00015.html (7,533 bytes)

83. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Paragon 585 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 07:29:03 -0500
Hi Chuck Are you sure the crystals are exactly on 6.3 MHz? If I was going to do this, I'd place an request for defective TenTec 6.3 MHz crystal filters. There should be some out there. You can harves
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-02/msg00022.html (8,015 bytes)

84. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Paragon 585 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 10:32:02 -0500
The early Paragons have a bad rap... PL lock problems, battery life... I own a Paragon II and it is a great rig. That tends to scare off a lot of potential owners. I'd rather deal with a project Omni
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-02/msg00024.html (8,814 bytes)

85. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Paragon 585 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:01:13 -0500
I, for one, would be very interested in hearing about how you make out. This is a discussion group for TenTec gear. I've seen a lot of off-topic discussions, so something as on topic as home grown cr
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-02/msg00027.html (8,866 bytes)

86. [TenTec] WTB: part from junker Omni VI option 1 rig (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:29:22 -0500
If anyone is parting out an Omni VI with the option 1 installed, I'd be interested in buying the complete board and or just the upgrade chip. Not being able to individually lock A and B VFOs is a pai
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-02/msg00030.html (7,661 bytes)

87. Re: [TenTec] WTB: part from junker Omni VI option 1 rig (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:09:06 -0500
No, actually I didn't... I understand they dumped a large number of older parts on their last move to smaller quarters. A guy was looking for cabinet decorative side ears, as used on many of the old
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-02/msg00034.html (7,906 bytes)

88. Re: [TenTec] WTB: part from junker Omni VI option 1 rig (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:58:52 -0500
NOT available. Just checked. Pete _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-02/msg00036.html (7,710 bytes)

89. Re: [TenTec] OMNI 5 GOES DEAD ON 40 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:39:42 -0500
Arrrgh! Dallas time chips?? I ran into this on my Paragon II. Ordered two chips on eBay, and received junk that had older date codes than what I was trying to replace from idiot Chinese vendors with
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-02/msg00037.html (8,298 bytes)

90. Re: [TenTec] OMNI 5 GOES DEAD ON 40 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:49:21 -0500
Well, I had a few opened up, but it is not a "chip," but a chip encased in a plastic case on a DIP header. The IC inside does have a pin for the external battery, but in the module the pin is bent ba
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-02/msg00049.html (10,359 bytes)

91. Re: [TenTec] WTB: part from junker Omni VI option 1 rig (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:24:29 -0500
Hi Clayton Let me research this.... option 1 adds the individual lock for both A and B VFO. I'm too worried about the button labels for the Option 1 changes, I can use a cheat sheet for that. I know
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-02/msg00051.html (9,238 bytes)

92. Re: [TenTec] OMNI 5 GOES DEAD ON 40 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:01:55 -0500
The Omni VI uses a common lithium button cell in a holder. East to change. Stores the time and band stack register information. The Paragon II stores the same info in the Dallas Ram Chip. I am guessi
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-02/msg00057.html (9,037 bytes)

93. Re: [TenTec] WTB: part from junker Omni VI option 1 rig, (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:54:41 -0500
Still looking... ROM chip must be from a Option I. Option III, where the boards and cables are changed probably will not work unless I can locate those parts as well. Would also consider a junker/tec
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-02/msg00067.html (7,028 bytes)

94. [TenTec] WTB: tech special Omni VI, option 1 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 23:42:05 -0400
I am looking to upgrade my original Omni VI rig... I'd like to find a tech special Omni VI that has the option 1 CPU control board installed. I'd also consider an Option 3 parts rig that has the need
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-03/msg00119.html (7,002 bytes)

95. [TenTec] Omni VI master osillator (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:23:16 -0400
Does anyone know the frequency for the Ovenaire ovenized oscillator in the early Omni VI? I assume it is 20 MHz, since it drives the uP clock directly, but I want to make sure. Pete _________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-03/msg00121.html (6,866 bytes)

96. [TenTec] Slow frequency drift Omni VI (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:27:23 -0400
I've been noticing that I have to retune CW stations when chasing DX operations. The drift is enough to be irritating when running narrow CW filters. What is the most likely cause for slow drift prob
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-03/msg00125.html (7,776 bytes)

97. Re: [TenTec] Tentec omni V tweak frequency, (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 10:00:04 -0400
You said it is off 120 kc (120 kHz) which is over 1/10th of a MHz. That is a tremendous amount of error... did you mean to say 120 cycles? 120 kHz error would probably be a major failure in the synth
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-03/msg00171.html (7,220 bytes)

98. Re: [TenTec] Fwd: Re: hz / KC Correction (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 15:14:17 -0400
Kc is not, but kc per second (kc/s) is as valid a kHz. A cycle is meaningless, unless it references a time period. kHz, cp/s, etc. The purpose of Hertz was to remove the ambiguity. But 1 Hz and 1 cp/
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-03/msg00203.html (7,163 bytes)

99. [TenTec] "WTB: Inrad roofing board for Omni VI" (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 13:51:32 -0400
I may be picking up a project Omni VI Plus. If I can get her running, I will be looking for Inrad roofing filter boards and Inrad roofing filters for the rig. If anyone has an unused Inrad Omni VI ro
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-03/msg00230.html (7,088 bytes)

100. Re: [TenTec] RKR Designs LLC purchases Alpha/Ten-Tec from RF Concepts, (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 12:05:21 -0400
It looks to me as if AA6DY is heading for retirement. I believe he was the investor who bankrolled must of the earlier takeovers? Hopefully this is just a changing of the guard, and that the new owne
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-04/msg00070.html (7,596 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu