Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:raf_3@msn.com: 108 ]

Total 108 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Plus: No RX or TX on 10 meters (Intermittent) (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 08:25:19 -0700
Welcome to the lead-free world of RoHS. Your spools of 60/40 solder are NOT RoHS-compliant...but will likely improve reliability of solder connections which are subjected to the stresses of expansion
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-07/msg00062.html (11,914 bytes)

42. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Plus: No RX or TX on 10 meters (Intermittent) (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 10:12:52 -0700
QSL. In my former life in military and space electronics, I spent many hundreds of hours chasing RoHS-induced problems (today they're called "issues"), including the microscopic fracturing of solder
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-07/msg00066.html (16,897 bytes)

43. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Plus: No RX or TX on 10 meters (Intermittent) (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 19:52:03 -0700
In my experience, yes. There are or have been a number of lead-free alloys developed to try to mitigate the problems arising from loss of the ductility properties of lead alloys. It's also true that
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-07/msg00080.html (32,827 bytes)

44. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Plus: No RX or TX on 10 meters (Intermittent) (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 20:54:04 -0700
That's a question that TT should be able to answer. The RoHS Directive was officially put into force in late 2002 or early 2003. But, some (many?) manufacturers were made aware of the impending/propo
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-07/msg00082.html (20,610 bytes)

45. [TenTec] Crowbar kit for 252/262 power supply (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 16:09:25 -0700
Does anyone have a TT overvoltage crowbar kit for a 252/262 PS that they never got around to installing? Haven't checked for availability from TT, but have to believe they're LONG ago obsoleted and n
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-08/msg00001.html (7,371 bytes)

46. [TenTec] My first Argosy (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 17:04:20 -0700
Recently acquired an estate Argosy 525 with the 225 p/s. After a thorough cleaning (dust) and replacing the broken dial cord*, it's working well, except for occasionally going deaf upon power-up. Hit
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-08/msg00003.html (7,961 bytes)

47. Re: [TenTec] Crowbar kit for 252/262 power supply (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 17:18:52 -0700
Thanks, Al. Yeah, it's a pretty simple circuit. I recalled discussion some months ago regarding the kit that TT offered as being compact and easily fit into the 252. So thought it at least worth tryi
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-08/msg00005.html (10,638 bytes)

48. Re: [TenTec] Crowbar kit for 252/262 power supply (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 17:33:58 -0700
Thanks, Mike. Time to build a couple to prevent vaporizing my Triton or OMNI-C. I'm fortunate that to date I've escaped Murphy's wrath. 73, Allen -- Original Message -- From: Mike Stricker via TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-08/msg00007.html (8,957 bytes)

49. Re: [TenTec] My first Argosy (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 18:03:53 -0700
Al, Yeah, I checked the spec's for the TT 218 (1.8KHz) and TT 220 (2.4KHz) filters, and surprisingly the insertion loss for the 218 is marginally lower (.2 dB) than that of the 220. Since my goal is
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-08/msg00008.html (10,031 bytes)

50. Re: [TenTec] SSB and CW filters wanted (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 21:25:41 -0700
Carl, Is that really true? Aren't the 218 and 219 employed as roofing filters in the 1st IF, and isn't the DSP BW control in the 3rd IF? If strong adjacent (and/or dirty) signal conditions warrant ti
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-10/msg00043.html (9,428 bytes)

51. Re: [TenTec] SSB and CW filters wanted (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 15:50:24 -0700
Thanks to all for generously sharing your knowledge. That generosity sure adds to the enjoyment and satisfaction of Ten Tec ownership...and the hobby itself. Tnx agn es 73, Allen--W7GIF -- Original M
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-10/msg00056.html (19,027 bytes)

52. Re: [TenTec] Paragon PLL Major & Minor Board (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:36:51 -0700
You might try KE9PQ who frequently lists Paragon subassemblies/parts on a large auction website. His email can be found on QRZ. I have no affiliation with KE9PQ or his operations/business. Allen--W7G
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00002.html (8,556 bytes)

53. Re: [TenTec] Paragon PLL Major & Minor Board (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:56:17 -0700
Might be worth checking with Gary Follett W0DNV...on both counts. I recently got got a "no longer available" ORION VFO encoder from him...priced right, shipped well and quickly, and 100% functional.
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00003.html (8,338 bytes)

54. Re: [TenTec] Paragon PLL Major & Minor Board---errata (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 16:36:24 -0700
Oops. Gary's call sign is W0DVN (not DNV). I'm not really dyslexic...but, confess to carelessness with the keystrokes. Allen--W7GIF -- Original Message -- From: A R<mailto:raf_3@msn.com> To: Discussi
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00004.html (10,219 bytes)

55. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II - Filter Classtime Please (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:39:31 -0700
The Corsair II was equipped bare-stock with two 8-pole 2.4KHz filters: One in the 9MHz 1st IF (on the 81252 XTAL FILTER board), and One in the 6.3MHz 2nd IF (on the 80979 PBT board). The 9MHz cf 2.4K
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00220.html (10,190 bytes)

56. Re: [TenTec] Orion II men battery date? (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 16:50:04 -0700
My 565 Orion has the A14 autotuner, which has no battery. Although the manual calls out a p/n 81956, the A14 board in my Orion carries only marking: "LDG RG-11". Did TT equip Orions with (at least) t
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00338.html (13,211 bytes)

57. Re: [TenTec] Orion II men battery date? (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 16:55:37 -0700
Tony, Before you remove all those torx-head screws...my 565 has the LDG RG-11 autotuner which has no battery. Allen--W7GIF -- Original Message -- From: Tony Lelieveld<mailto:va3dwi@gmail.com> To: Dis
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00339.html (16,372 bytes)

58. Re: [TenTec] Orion II men battery date? (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 17:38:31 -0700
Hehehe...that's just what I did after the first R&R...&R. I'm glad that I'm in good company on at least one account. Allen--W7GIF -- Original Message -- Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 5:14 PM Subje
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00341.html (10,545 bytes)

59. Re: [TenTec] Orion II men battery date? (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 21:54:41 -0700
Oops. The LDG part/model number is RT-11 (not RG-11). I'll blame that one on clumsy fingers. Allen--W7GIF -- Original Message -- Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 4:55 PM Tony, Before you remove all t
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00345.html (21,555 bytes)

60. [TenTec] QSK board for a Centurion (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 00:50:23 -0700
Does anyone have a Centurion QSK board (p/n 78247) that's surplus to their needs? If so, please contact me off list. Tnx es 73, Allen--W7GIF _______________________________________________ TenTec mai
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-02/msg00233.html (6,575 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu