Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rex@lint.mv.com: 119 ]

Total 119 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground level and sea level (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:09:55 -0700
How close do you have to be to get the advantage of being at the "edge"? De k1hi Perhaps they don't know how to adjust their altimeters. Me, I'm at 62 feet, highest point in county is 75 feet and I a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00261.html (9,175 bytes)

42. Re: [TowerTalk] aircraft bearing (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:23:51 -0400
They used Lignum Vitae for the blocks on old sailing ships, the ones without wheels, just multiple holes, for the rigging of the tall ships. De K1HI Rex Lint 26 Brek Dr. Merrimack, NH 03054 PH: 603-8
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00874.html (9,571 bytes)

43. Re: [TowerTalk] Distance between Guys and Antennas? (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:03:35 -0400
Frank, You say "Rohn's engineering drawings show guys installed at the top and some distance down." When I look at the info at http://www.rohnnet.com/ROHNNET/rohnnet2001/catalog/pdfs/25G/25G-9.pdf I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00721.html (10,312 bytes)

44. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna problem? (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:57:15 -0400
Steve, Using good ol' logic, try a different transmitter, then perhaps fix the FT990? Rex, K1HI Rex Lint, Consultant 26 Brek Dr. Merrimack, NH 03054 PH: 603-860-7651 FAX: 603-882-6612 --Original Mess
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00178.html (9,241 bytes)

45. Re: [TowerTalk] Trapping my 80m Inverted L for 160? (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 08:09:16 -0400
Hasan, There is a design done by Jeff Briggs derived from the Battle Creek Special that you could adapt. He called it the "BC Trapper" and I'm sure you can google it. It's a 40-80-160 with top-loadin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00365.html (10,732 bytes)

46. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 20G Tower lay down questions (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:04:21 -0400
Don, We've regularly "walked up" 30 feet of Rohn 25 at field day - without a "hinged base". Of course, there are more than 3 people, but many of them don't add any muscle to the process. 3 should be
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00453.html (9,455 bytes)

47. Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole resonates lower than expected. (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:02:42 -0400
The 2005 handbook says, "If insulated wire is used, a 3 to 5% shortening beyond the standard 468/f length will be required to obtain resonance at the desired frequency. This is caused by the increase
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00596.html (10,837 bytes)

48. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: 135 degrees phasing. (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:06:23 -0400
Joe, Why wouldn't you just add half of a 1/4 wave to a 1/4 wave? 90 degrees plus 43 degrees - 135 degrees. Rex - K1HI Merrimack --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00687.html (8,940 bytes)

49. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: 135 degrees phasing. (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:50:53 -0400
Oops! That should have read 90 degrees plus 45 degrees = 135 degrees. We're talking electrical length here, not physical length - but you already took care of that issue by using the velocity factor.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00691.html (10,310 bytes)

50. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M DIPOLE USIGN COAX (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:29:20 -0500
Hector, Why not just bend the ends toward each other: I |\ I | \ I \ I > I / I | / I |/ I I Rex, K1HI TT's: I read the last NCJ, where K3LR 160m Dipole as sloper appears, i will like to try something
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00340.html (8,462 bytes)

51. Re: [TowerTalk] wind force equation (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:18:05 -0500
Matt, See http://www.knmi.nl/samenw/hydra/faq/press.html Wind doesn't have a "force," it puts pressure on an area. Once you know the pressure and the area, you can figure out the force. The area depe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00075.html (8,788 bytes)

52. Re: [TowerTalk] WT51 base drawings (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:09:18 -0500
Ron, You know about this, right? RCB-37/51LT (WT51 & LM237) 82 $275.00 (http://www.tashtowers.com/pricelist.htm) De K1HI Rex Lint, Consultant 26 Brek Dr. Merrimack, NH 03054 PH: 603-860-7651 FAX: 603
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00371.html (7,970 bytes)

53. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 - 40 Beam (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 23:51:24 -0400
It seems to me that a 2 inch boom is really too short... Rex K1HI Rex Lint, Consultant PH: 603-860-7651 FAX: 603-882-6612 --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00182.html (8,813 bytes)

54. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 - 40 Beam (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 10:02:24 -0400
With a 2 inch long boom, they'd be pretty close together... I wouldn't expect element thickness to play more than a small part unless the elements are very close together and then I'd not expect much
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00187.html (8,995 bytes)

55. Re: [TowerTalk] New Cushcraft XM240 Trouble (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:52:24 -0400
The higher loss in the 213 will hide the mis-match more than in the hardline. K1HI - Rex Given a long enough feedline, one can make anything at the antenna end look like a perfectly matched load in t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00228.html (11,043 bytes)

56. Re: [TowerTalk] AB-577/GRC Engineering Specs? (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:05:42 -0400
Michael, If you were to use a push-up mast and put a TV antenna on top of that, would the town make you get an engineering analysis of the set-up? I'd try to talk them into relaxing the requirement.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00255.html (10,754 bytes)

57. Re: [TowerTalk] Upgrading from Rohn 25 to 45 (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:51:58 -0400
to turn when the tower twists, taking the torsion load off the base - one of the common failure modes. Don't unhook your guys, tho! De K1HI Rex Lint --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@cont
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00290.html (12,135 bytes)

58. [TowerTalk] FW: Guying on a small lot (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:50:30 -0400
I'd be careful about non-symmetric guy placement - it changes the horizontal forces so they are out-of-balance. Last field day a tower at N1FD bent over because one of the guys was much longer (furth
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00303.html (9,822 bytes)

59. Re: [TowerTalk] KT34 Problems (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:21:36 -0400
One thing that happened on mine was that the insulator that holds the straps that connect the two driven elements together decomposed and the straps, which cross over each other, would periodically s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00021.html (7,989 bytes)

60. [TowerTalk] FW: self-supporting rohn 25g?? (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:45:04 -0400
Here're a few changes that might make it easier next time... Get a few helpers so you can walk up 30 feet WITH THE GUYS ON IT. Secure the guys, then put 2 more sections on, just like you did before.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00208.html (8,025 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu