- 1. [CQ-Contest] DX-to-English translations (score: 1)
- Author: rhummel@monad.net (Rob Hummel)
- Date: Tue Apr 1 13:13:39 1997
- During the recent ARRL DX and CQ WPX contests, I noted that a number of US hams were having trouble understanding some of the idomatic phrases used by non-US hams. Some of this can be attributed to d
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00008.html (8,558 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] WPX 0-point discussion (score: 1)
- Author: rhummel@monad.net (Rob Hummel)
- Date: Wed Apr 2 23:10:39 1997
- Please don't count me as one of those lobbying to change the WPX 0-point rule. As 2-time LP/AB champ, I see nothing wrong with the way the scoring is now. Giving 1 point for in-country contacts would
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00027.html (8,569 bytes)
- 3. rhummel@monad.net (Rob Hummel): [CQ-Contest] WPX 0-point discussion (score: 1)
- Author: rhummel@monad.net (Rob Hummel)
- Date: Thu Apr 3 20:23:46 1997
- NK4G has some comments on my feelings about 0-pt QSOs. Trey also questioned some of my opinions. Here's some illumination. Some real vacuous statements here. 1. Unfair advantage? Hardly. I EARNED tha
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00041.html (9,939 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Station design resources (score: 1)
- Author: rhummel@monad.net (Rob Hummel)
- Date: Wed Apr 16 14:10:01 1997
- My new house had the following criteria designed into the hamshack. 1. In the basement, both for better grounding and to prevent family rebellion during CONTESTS. 2. Seperate entrance to the hamshack
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00217.html (7,049 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] WPX whining vs winning (score: 1)
- Author: rhummel@monad.net (Rob Hummel)
- Date: Wed Apr 16 14:10:04 1997
- I've read with interest and horror some of the opinions and statements that have been put forth on the topic of the WPX and contests in general, how they're scored, and how they're unfair. I'm very c
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00218.html (13,942 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu