Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:richard@karlquist.com: 1580 ]

Total 1580 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TowerTalk] source for propagation data? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
I've observed that 2 verticals on 20 meters 800 feet apart fade in and out independently. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00039.html (7,307 bytes)

162. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials and Non-Vertical Antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 16:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
I have a 230 foot diameter wire grid ground screen. I tried building a 40 meter ground warmer dipole about 15 feet above it. I didn't see any measurable improvement with signals received vs a 30 ft h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00058.html (9,419 bytes)

163. RE: [TowerTalk] Narrow Band Filters (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 22:36:39 -0700
The key problem is dirty transmitters, as opposed to receiver overload. You can afford an extra 6 or 10 dB of receiver front end loss due to filtering to fix receiver overload. On the transmit side,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00120.html (10,777 bytes)

164. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: narrowband filters (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 18:00:44 -0700
I'm looking 100 kHz is less than 1% BW on 20 meters. If you can manage an unloaded Q of (quite difficult, but doable), you will lose about 1 dB per resonator. Let's say this filter covers 14000 to 14
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00171.html (9,002 bytes)

165. Re: [TowerTalk] M2 or KLM 20m5 beam question (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
I was considering that beam too, until I realized that it has less than 1 dB of gain* over a 4 element SteppIR that covers all those other bands. The boom length of those beams is in a region where g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00312.html (8,004 bytes)

166. RE: [TowerTalk] Ring-Rotors (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 06:26:51 -0700
I just bought a used crank up tower that was set up with a General TIC ring rotator at the top of the 3rd section. There was a beam there and another at the top. The rotator has inserts that stick in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00325.html (12,078 bytes)

167. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower measurements & broadcast interference (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 12:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
The N2PK analyzer uses a heterodyne system that should much less susceptable to BCI. That is the ultimate solution to this problem. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ See: http
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00342.html (9,826 bytes)

168. RE: [TowerTalk] Limitation on tower width. Was: Revocation ofBuildingPermit? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:18:20 -0700
Cupertino has a 12 inch width limitation, which is just enough for Rohn 25. Basically, that limits you to guyed towers or self supporting pipe towers. A 55 foot Sky Needle would be perfectly legal. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00478.html (11,240 bytes)

169. RE: [TowerTalk] Limitation on tower width. Was: Revocation ofBuildingPermit? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 11:44:32 -0700
Well, when they were available, few people took advantage of them. Instead, they saved money and used an MA-550 and cranked it down when the wind came up. Perhaps US Tower would be willing to make a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00483.html (10,563 bytes)

170. RE: [TowerTalk] Limitation on tower width. Was:RevocationofBuildingPermit? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 13:40:13 -0700
The big bertha posting, I suspect was for humor. But it is interesting to observe how many zoning problems could be solved by throwing money at the problem. I know of a case where a ham who paid $1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00485.html (9,823 bytes)

171. Re: [TowerTalk] TRX-80 Fold over fixture (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 22:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Also, does anyone know how the tower is supposed to pivot when using those fixtures? One simple possibility is just using a pair of ordinary bolts, but it would seem that would screw up the threads a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00492.html (9,389 bytes)

172. RE: [TowerTalk] Limitation on tower width. Was: Revocation ofBuildingPermit? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 08:44:35 -0700
I just looked over the calcs on the HDX-5106 and I would estimate that it is not capable of 90 MPH cranked up (extrapolating from 50 and 70 MPH numbers). That is why IMHO they won't do the 90 MPH cal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00507.html (8,401 bytes)

173. Re: [TowerTalk] Clarification: Cutting slots in aluminum tubing (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
I bought an aluminum cutting blade for my circular saw from McMasterCarr. I have used it in both my table saw and miter saw. In place of thicker slots, you can cut more of them. I've used as many as
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00518.html (7,639 bytes)

174. Re: [TowerTalk] 600 Ohm Line (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
Turns out you can't consider the phone line as a lumped component even to get audio to the CO; moreover, the characteristic impedance is complex. This is why the phone company has to use loading coil
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00916.html (9,250 bytes)

175. Re: [TowerTalk] Two Vertical Antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
The 7MHz antenna is a My 7 MHz vertical is a dead heat against an inverted vee at 90 feet and my 3.5 MHz vertical blows away an inverted vee at 60 feet. Both .25 wl verticals are over extensive groun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00094.html (7,595 bytes)

176. RE: [TowerTalk] Quad vs SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:44:52 -0700
I have a Lightning Bolt quad and a 4 element SteppIR. My experience is the same, the SteppIR is way more directive than the quad. Before the quad, I had a KT34. It was also more directive than the qu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00695.html (9,012 bytes)

177. RE: [TowerTalk] Calculations (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 07:43:18 -0700
A possible reason would be that IBC-2000 might be a stricter spec, and the tower is not engineered to meet that spec, at least with a usable antenna area on top. Does anyone know if IBC-2000 is a ti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00263.html (11,699 bytes)

178. Re: [TowerTalk] Antennas not at the top of a crank up (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
You can get ring rotators that mount via pegs that insert into the top of an intermediate section, (the vertical tubes of most crankups are hollow). I have one that came with a tower I recently acqui
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00442.html (8,940 bytes)

179. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Importance of Amateur Radio Emergency Comms (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
I've long thought we should advance the above argument. Hams invest a lot of their own time and money to provide a free-to-the-pubilc communications infrastructure in time of emergency. If ham radio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00576.html (11,209 bytes)

180. RE: [TowerTalk] Broadband Internet Service Letter (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:39:43 -0700
Not necessarily. Some BPL schemes use the power lines to get to a local WiFi point, and then use WiFi to the home. A hybrid scheme. Example: AT&T Menlo Park. Rick N6RK ______________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00706.html (7,670 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu