Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:richard@karlquist.com: 1580 ]

Total 1580 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted Vee vs. Dipole QRN (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:37:51 -0800 (PST)
Make sure you have a good current balun on the inverted vee so the feedline doesn't act as a vertical ( =noisy ) antenna. The only acceptable balun IMHO is about 15 turns of RG58 coax wound around a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00046.html (9,124 bytes)

322. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:43:41 -0800 (PST)
On 160 meters, several thousand feet is only a handfull of wavelengths. I can show you plenty of locations several thousand feet from anything that have lots of power line noise. My own vertical is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00047.html (8,879 bytes)

323. Re: [TowerTalk] Questions about Irrigation Pipe for Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 12:45:07 -0800 (PST)
So-called "2 1/2 inch" water pipe or conduit has an OD of 2 7/8 inches. Thinwall 3 inch conduit has an ID of 2.9 inches. This allows for a 12.5 mil gap, theoretically. This might work for tubing in p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00069.html (11,514 bytes)

324. Re: [TowerTalk] Questions about Irrigation Pipe for Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 23:18:34 -0800 (PST)
You can use aluminum stovepipe tape to bridge the gap. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@conte
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00074.html (9,492 bytes)

325. Re: [TowerTalk] Questions about Irrigation Pipe for Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 11:26:42 -0800 (PST)
You don't understand what I meant. I transition between pipe sizes with PVC pipe couplers. This gives me an insulated joint. If I don't want an insulated joint, I "aluminum plate" the PVC pipe with t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00083.html (12,025 bytes)

326. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted Vee vs. Dipole QRN (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 11:33:24 -0800 (PST)
Any inverted vee is a much better receive antenna that any vertical at my QTY. So at least at my QTH, it's just a fact. Now if I drive my mobile to a place with no power lines, the receive noise duri
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00084.html (8,896 bytes)

327. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted Vee vs. Dipole QRN (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 23:34:16 -0800 (PST)
Local manmade noise may start out randomly polarized. However, only the vertically polarized component can propagate by ground wave. This is well known physics. The horizontal component is rapidly a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00087.html (8,800 bytes)

328. Re: [TowerTalk] vertical vs horizontal--a different take (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 06:41:47 -0800 (PST)
My vertical is feed by open wire line through a balun transformer. It is very well decoupled from the feedline. Not to mention it is fed against a massive ground screen. It is extremely noisy on rece
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00254.html (8,378 bytes)

329. Re: [TowerTalk] Copper wire prices (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:18:19 -0800 (PST)
FWIW, I just bought a bunch of aluminum wire for $3 a pound. It works out to about 1 cent per foot. It may or may not corrode, depending on your soil. I am going to try it and see how it works out in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00343.html (11,085 bytes)

330. Re: [TowerTalk] Copper wire prices (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:22:03 -0800 (PST)
I had just been to Home Depot (which has real time pricing) and knew the real price of wire. I went into an Ace Hardware and noticed that the prices were out of date by a factor of >2. I have to admi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00344.html (9,309 bytes)

331. Re: [TowerTalk] Copper wire prices (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:24:05 -0800 (PST)
Because of skin effect, the RF conductivity ratio is the square root of 65%, which is 81%. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ To
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00345.html (8,836 bytes)

332. Re: [TowerTalk] Copper wire prices (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:26:09 -0800 (PST)
I bought alloy 1100 soft annealed. Basically, pure aluminum. They sell it as "tie wire", to tie by hand to package stuff. Pure aluminum is supposed to be the most corrosion proof, AFAIK. Rick N6RK __
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00346.html (9,176 bytes)

333. Re: [TowerTalk] Copper wire prices (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 06:54:39 -0800
I just asked MWS Industries (the big magnet wire company) about aluminum wire with formvar. They said they don't make any insulated aluminum wire. I will note that insulated copper house wire is actu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00374.html (11,831 bytes)

334. [TowerTalk] Real waterproof connectors for rotators (was: source of6/8 pin connectors?) (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:20:56 -0800
A much better solution than either CJ or trailer connector pigtails is at this URL: http://www.deutschipd.com/Products/DT_Series/dt_series.html Real waterproof connectors that mount right on the end
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00521.html (10,189 bytes)

335. Re: [TowerTalk] Real waterproof connectors for rotators (was:source of 6/8 pin connectors?) (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:59:02 -0800 (PST)
I never recommended them for DC power purposes. I recommended them for rotators. I use Anderson Powerpoles for all DC power. dcpwr.com has one of the most complete lines of Powerpole parts; a lot of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00568.html (14,547 bytes)

336. Re: [TowerTalk] Shortened Antennas for 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:26:56 -0800 (PST)
Do yourself a favor and use top loading wires. I simply fasten the top loading wires to the top set of guy ropes using "ty-raps" (use the black UV proof type). You can eliminate or reduce the loading
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00676.html (7,512 bytes)

337. Re: [TowerTalk] stacking monobanders (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:01:28 -0800
Interesting that you should mention A/B'ing. I did a lot of A/B'ing of 40 meter inverted vee's at 30, 60, and 90 ft. I thought the 90 ft one would have a substantial advantage over the lower ones, b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00823.html (9,353 bytes)

338. Re: [TowerTalk] stacking monobanders (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:48:07 -0800 (PST)
No I didn't overlook that. I installed remote relays that disconnected both halves of the unused inverted vee from the coax. The antenna under test was terminated in 50 ohms at all times. Yes I did t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00867.html (11,456 bytes)

339. Re: [TowerTalk] stacking monobanders (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:46:09 -0800 (PST)
Yes my inverted vee's were resonant. Again, I had relays that opened up the feed points of the unused antennas. EZNEC will show voltage induced, however, a floating quarter wave will not experience m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00882.html (9,973 bytes)

340. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers and property values (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:31:31 -0800 (PST)
When I have gotten permits for towers or other buildings, the taxing authority has simply mechanically increased the valuation by the amount of construction cost, which must be declared on the permit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00458.html (9,568 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu