Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rick@area.com: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] re: forked radial systems (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (Rick Karlquist)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:22:10 -0800
Regarding the proposal for forked radial systems: I had considered that a few years ago but concluded that it is not cost effective unless wire is extremely expensive and labor for making fork connec
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00382.html (7,748 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] influence of tower (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 7 Dec 1999 05:06:33 -0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Any floating conductor much over a quarter wavelength will have substantial coupling. If the conductor is grounded, then it only has to be somewhat more than 1/8 WL. Si
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00106.html (8,080 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] re: The Ultimate (Perfect) Ground? (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 23 Dec 1999 05:02:40 -0000
I tried this on 20 meters. I laid out 60 radials 250 feet long in a 45 degree sector pointed towards Europe. It produced no improvement with a 1/4 wave vertical and 2 to 3 dB improvement (to Europe
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00427.html (9,078 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] re: open wire line (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 17 Nov 1999 05:46:29 -0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> I just finished installing 1000 ft of open wire line. Much cheaper and lower loss than coax and the supports didn't cost a fortune. We used T-posts every 50 feet with
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00353.html (7,927 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] re: figure 8 knots (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 18 Oct 1999 02:39:17 -0000
A more useful URL for knots (at least for me) was: <<http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~styms1l/cave/>> Scroll down the left hand area and click on "knots". Then click on double figure 8. I previously knew
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00492.html (7,932 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] re: non-permanent towers (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 24 Oct 1999 17:12:43 -0000
Just another data point on temporary towers. When I was WA7VZX in Seattle, I had 60 feet of Rohn 25 up with a TH6 on it. The base was five feet of Rohn 25 buried in the ground. Guy anchors were screw
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00689.html (7,083 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] soldering radials together (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 8 Aug 1999 03:50:34 -0000
I am in the process of bonding together a bunch of radials made from tinned copper buss wire. I would like to get opinions on the best way to do this. My current plan is to use solder consisting of 3
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00133.html (7,885 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] How to tell if crank up cable needs replacement (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 9 May 1999 00:44:14 -0000
I have a 15 year old crank up tubular mast. I rarely crank it up; it has problaby been cranked up and down only a few dozen times in the 15 years. The cable (at least the part I can see) has absolute
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00177.html (7,376 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Re: ground radial fields (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 29 Mar 1999 05:14:08 -0000
I actually constructed 1/8 of a system of 500 radials 4 wavelengths long on 20 meters. The 45 degree sector with the long radials was pointed toward Europe. It was worth an extra 3 dB when using a ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00517.html (9,416 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Re: Ground radial fields (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 31 Mar 1999 05:30:53 -0000
I'm not sure if this is clear on my web site, but I had 32 quarter wave radials spaced equally around the test vertical in addition to the 60 radials that were 4 wavelengths long. So my opinion is t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00558.html (9,143 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Re: comments on Yagi height (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 9 Feb 1999 05:56:41 -0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> I have been conducting tests comparing a 40 meter inverted vee with 90 degree apex angle at an apex height of 90 feet with a similar antenna at 55 feet, and also with
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00152.html (8,203 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] re: rhombics (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 21 Oct 1998 02:34:43 -0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> I was just doing some rhombic modeling yesterday. I'm not sure what "350m in overall length" means, whether tip to tip or length of wire. If tip to tip, you are looking
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00748.html (10,113 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Re: Vertical Dipoles and Ground Planes (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 21 Sep 1998 03:14:14 -0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> For further info on this topic, see "A Theoretical and Experimental Study of the Effects of Very Large Ground Screens on 20 Meter Verticals" which is available on my we
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00504.html (9,436 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] cranes for tower erection (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 17 Aug 1998 00:07:03 -0000
There was some recent discussion on towertalk about using cranes to install towers. I am confused by what I read. On the one hand, various people mentioned that you can't just assemble 90 feet of Roh
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00490.html (9,176 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Universal Towers phone no needed (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 20 Aug 1998 02:18:57 -0000
Can anyone give me a phone number or address for Universal Towers. Texas Towers says they are in Michigan some where, but I don't turn up anything using the suusual search engines. Rick Karlquist N6R
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00574.html (7,305 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] verticals with lots of radials (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 29 Apr 1998 05:04:28 -0000
W8JI sez: Here is another anecdotal data point: either a full size dipole at 55 feet or a full size vertical with 2 elevated quarter wave radials, and this was running 700 watts. They simply couldn't
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00875.html (7,988 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] beverage doubts (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 29 Apr 1998 05:17:02 -0000
We put up a 1300 foot Beverage, and were not all that impressed in general either, although it had excellent front to back ratio. Might be good from the West Coast to the Pacific if you need to reje
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00876.html (8,314 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] 160 meter vertical construction (score: 1)
Author: rick@area.com (Richard Karlquist)
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 21:12:28 -0700
My situation is slightly different than most of you. I do *not* have or plan to get a tower with Yagi(s) for 40 thru 10 meters. Hence I do not have a skyhook from which to hang a 160 meter vertical.
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00387.html (8,081 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu