Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:riel@surriel.com: 65 ]

Total 65 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] Antennas for 80m (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:10:24 -0400
Another option to increase the efficiency is to raise the point of maximum current well above ground, by using a K2LQ double L. http://www.yccc.org/Articles/double_l.htm Whichever is easiest (inverte
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00408.html (8,690 bytes)

42. Re: [TowerTalk] Discharge with a dipole (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 20:30:22 -0400
I guess the spark plugs might help protect your 1Mohm resistors from lightning, so they can take care of bleeding off the static that would otherwise build up gradually? :) -- All rights reversed. __
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00254.html (9,041 bytes)

43. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Why radials improve radiation! (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 14:15:24 -0400
You can calculate this the other way around. First, build an antenna (say 1/4 wave vertical) with an exceedingly good ground system (say 120 1/2 wave radials). Assume that system has near zero ground
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00384.html (8,972 bytes)

44. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Fw: Why radials improve radiation! (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 18:04:48 -0400
You may not strictly need radials, but the point of maximum current is still only 1/4 wavelength above ground. This means that: 1) the ground loss due to not having radials is not as ridiculously hig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00392.html (8,380 bytes)

45. Re: [TowerTalk] Need help with HF problems (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 18:41:20 -0400
While I agree that most hams are cheap, I do not believe it makes any economic sense when it comes to connectors. Risking the finals of your $400 radio, in order to save $1.30 per connector (for at t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00481.html (8,836 bytes)

46. Re: [TowerTalk] Radial length question (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:27:33 -0400
Someone who sets up a vertical antenna temporarily and only has time, space or material for a couple of radials may be better off by raising the feedpoint way off the ground. This can be done either
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-06/msg00213.html (7,652 bytes)

47. [TowerTalk] antenna relays (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:10:24 -0400
I am looking at building a few shortened-with-capacity-hat vertical dipole arrays for the coming winter, and am wondering what kind of relays to use for antenna switching. I am looking at DPDT relays
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00305.html (7,383 bytes)

48. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna relays (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:18:50 -0400
Thank you Felipe, It looks like the G2RL-24 relays are the DPDT relays that I want. They are available in various coil voltage ratings, but it's easy to find the 12V DC ones. Looks like Mouser has th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00311.html (7,067 bytes)

49. [TowerTalk] relay/rotor control cable surge protector (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 23:27:12 -0400
I am planning a few vertical arrays (vertical dipoles hanging from trees) for this fall, and am wondering what kind of surge protection people use on the relay control cables. I am looking for someth
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00262.html (6,699 bytes)

50. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: low band antenna without good ground (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 14:03:52 -0400
I'm hoping that the invisible fence wire is built to last, because it's cheap and easily available :) -- All rights reversed. _______________________________________________ _________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00323.html (8,980 bytes)

51. Re: [TowerTalk] trees and verticals (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:53:51 -0500
Some people apparently have noticed a lot of difference. However, in this thread the person who noticed the most difference, also had the tallest & widest trees... I imagine a wider tree not only cap
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00683.html (8,811 bytes)

52. Re: [TowerTalk] trees and verticals (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 11:36:47 -0500
I think I get it now... 1) If the element is very low resistance, the RF will induce a lot of current, but it will get re-radiated. 2) If the element is medium low resistance, the RF will induce a fa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00728.html (10,488 bytes)

53. Re: [TowerTalk] Copper strap bonding ideas? (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:42:36 -0500
Indeed. The way to protect your house, is to ensure that everything in your house is at the same potential. Normally this is easy, since stuff only comes into the house in one spot, and every ground
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-01/msg00183.html (8,531 bytes)

54. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:26:37 -0500
Apparently the government, at least MITRE, has been building frequency-independent directional phased arrays for quite a while now, with voltage probe antennas, an amp at each antenna and coax delay
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00174.html (8,478 bytes)

55. Re: [TowerTalk] HI-Z antennas (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:35:48 -0500
Thank you for that schematic. How can you aim your array east or west, when the west element has reversed polarity on its transformer? Am I missing something? -- All rights reversed. ________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00175.html (7,862 bytes)

56. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:53:54 -0400
Alternatively, if you do not have space for radials, you can reduce your ground losses by elevating the center of current above ground. You can do this by building a double L antenna: http://www.yccc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00209.html (8,845 bytes)

57. Re: [TowerTalk] OT: Phased Verticals with FCPs (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 18:45:39 -0500
If so, is there anything special about feeding the array? The feed point impedance for inverted Ls with FCPs (and double Ls, for that matter) will be different than for ground mounted verticals with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00324.html (7,971 bytes)

58. Re: [TowerTalk] Comparing Hi-Z Receive Arrays and KB7GF Shared Apex Loop (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:49:59 -0400
On 08/13/2013 10:31 AM, Dan Schaaf wrote: The HiZ clearly outperforms the K9AY loop and coax mag loop. Probably will also outperform the SAL. The HiZ 4 square and 4-8 Pro is a phased array and so rem
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00312.html (8,210 bytes)

59. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Method of calculating phase delay variation (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 13:35:59 -0400
There is another reason. Sound frequencies are really low, so speakers that are run out of phase (and in the same room) are close to zero wavelengths apart, and can actually cancel out the bulk of ea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00054.html (9,302 bytes)

60. Re: [TowerTalk] 1. Ferrite, 2. Polyphasers (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 19:45:35 -0400
Yes, the frequency at which the choke works best changes with inductance. G3TXQ has a nice page on that: http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/chokes/ I suppose the second one can take the strike if the first
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00107.html (7,827 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu