Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rkolarik@neb.rr.com: 275 ]

Total 275 documents matching your query.

161. [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 18:02:51 -0600
The new ARRL letter arrived today and this is what I sent to my division director. Hi Cliff, Sorry to bug you again but this thing won't go away. In todays ARRL letter was an explanation concerning R
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00217.html (7,869 bytes)

162. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:11:28 -0600
Just remember if you're entertaining thoughts of dropping your ARRL membership over this mess, you can't change the organization from the outside. Non-members are not a concern to them. Ron K0IDT sad
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00227.html (8,422 bytes)

163. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:07:48 -0600
A couple of fresh comments from K0SM and WA3VJB if you haven't checked today. Ron K0IDT -- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00246.html (7,748 bytes)

164. Re: [RTTY] ARRL board of Directors meeting this week (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:48:24 -0600
Actually I would like to see this silliness from ARRL stop once and for all. The petition was introduced by one director, approved by a committee of 5, of which the director was one, with no input fr
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00277.html (9,630 bytes)

165. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM RTTY is a zoo (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 16:36:53 -0600
It's called "leader board bingo". Some of us would be happy with one mode/band some feel the need for all bands/modes plus insurance contacts......bragging rights at Visalia. Ron K0IDT -- Original Me
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00017.html (9,175 bytes)

166. [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:02:38 -0600
The ARRL FAQ is up http://www.arrl.org/rm-11708-faq I haven't had time to go through it yet. Ron K0IDT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00312.html (6,379 bytes)

167. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:53:25 -0600
Yup, trust us. This is what one question/answer should look like Q. Did ARRL evaluate the potential for interference to RTTY, CW and narrow bandwidth data modes that could result from an increase in
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00352.html (9,222 bytes)

168. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:46:48 -0600
Kai, Sorry for the late reply, list messages are not coming through in a timely manner. I'm well aware there are no bandwidth limits currently and bandplans are only suggestions but what the ARRL is
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00367.html (10,798 bytes)

169. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:32:48 -0600
Good idea Jay and timely since the ARRL has instructed the HF band planning committee to come up with something for digital mode usage by the July BOD meeting. The minutes are here <http://www.arrl.o
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00372.html (9,209 bytes)

170. Re: [RTTY] Arrl requests digital mode comments (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 17:57:42 -0600
Easy Joe, look at the date on the submission. She'll most likely demand 20% now that traffic has increased significantly, mostly marine email. Even the guys on eHam and the Zed grew tired of her ALE
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00012.html (11,846 bytes)

171. Re: [RTTY] Legality of Circumventing Commercial Maritime ISP Services?? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 16:16:49 -0500
One of the pay-to-play common carrier services like Sailmail would have to file a formal complaint to deal with this. ARRL won't do anything and I doubt a bunch of hams bugging the FCC won't get resu
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00144.html (8,291 bytes)

172. Re: [RTTY] List of Winlink stations (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 16:34:40 -0500
John that's the same tired circular argument about the sub band "ghetto". It's supposed to be shared spectrum and the rest of the world really doesn't care about our allocations, that's why we have S
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00145.html (9,442 bytes)

173. Re: [RTTY] Response to ARRL request for inputs for new Band Plan (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 16:45:03 -0500
Terry I already sent my comments in with the suggestion they try to follow the IARU bandplan to bring the US into better alignment with the rest of the world. I also pointed out the recommendation to
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00146.html (10,864 bytes)

174. Re: [RTTY] Response to ARRL request for inputs for new Band Plan (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 16:58:42 -0500
Lack of experimentation? Page 64 of April QST, H4FSK from KN6KB. Ron K0IDT -- Original Message -- From: "Kok Chen" <chen@mac.com> To: "RTTY Reflector" <rtty@contesting.com> Cc: "Terry" <ab5k@hotmail.
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00147.html (10,793 bytes)

175. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 question (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 17:11:10 -0500
IARU says 2.7kHz. Ron K0IDT Folks, Sorry if this has been asked before but in reference the filing that the ARRL made to the FCC: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958815 On page 11 there
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00149.html (7,739 bytes)

176. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 18:09:49 -0500
We shouldn't have to move if the ARRL would adopt the Region 2 bandplan. Don't get fixated on mode, application is more important and if the lower band ends follow the Region 2 plan the problem is so
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00177.html (8,512 bytes)

177. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Band Planproposal (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 18:17:41 -0500
Do you have the ability to read the body of a Pactor 3 message not addressed to you? Ron K0IDT * Given that the unattended digital stations are in violation of part 97 by passing commercial traffic T
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00178.html (8,544 bytes)

178. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Band Planproposal (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:18:35 -0500
Tom, Sailmail has dedicated frequencies outside the ham bands http://www.sailmail.com/ Ron K0IDT * Given that the unattended digital stations are in violation of part 97 by passing commercial traffic
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00187.html (9,262 bytes)

179. Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:54:16 -0500
The Region 2 band plan segregates emissions by bandwidth, application and mode. It also suggests "unattended" station use should be limited which is the actual problem. 73, Ron K0IDT piece/brand of h
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00214.html (8,463 bytes)

180. Re: [RTTY] 3khz wide signal at about 14.100 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:08:48 -0500
Minor point, Winlink is a system and Pactor is a mode. Winlink will accept connects from different modes but Pactor 3/4 seems to be preferred by the development team. Ron K0IDT Is this pactor 4, winl
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00256.html (8,233 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu