This thread has been an interesting one. Lets get this one back on track. Quite frankly I don't see a need for a change in rules. From the ARRL General rules: 3.7. All transmitters and receivers must
Joe, W4TV, this note is not directed towards you, but you have, as well as a few others have struck a cord with me, ie the operator should be in the 500m circle. OK folks, as one who has put a lot of
Paul: I can't resist. I just checked my 2006 Nov. SS CW log, and you were in it! Did you realize that you worked a remote station for a WTX multiplier? And don't worry I worked another NL station for
Mike: I don't think the rule makers need to address remote ops. Heres why in two simple points: 1 - The FCC has a rule on remote stations and how they can operate 2 - The contest rule makers have add
The last couple of days have been very interesting with all the opinions on this one. Heres my stand on this. 1 - The FCC has rules in place that govern remote STATIONS, I'm following those rules. 2
Your's and everyone else's argument of the operator being in the same location is hog wash. You guys are taking this too far. This thread basically started out as a I can't put up antennas in my loca
Howdy, How about this idea: As an ARRL member I choose to receive NCJ instead of QST. 99 % of the content of QST is of no interest to me. On the other hand, 99% of NCJ is of great interest to me. Why
Bob: I purchased a Dell laptop with XP Pro from my local dealer. I understand you can still get XP from Dell. Before I purchased my Dell I went to best buy with the soundboard check software from Wri
I maintain that your both wrong. Rich - N5ZC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
I've been sitting back reading all the emails about remote operation. Several times I started typing a response, but every time, some one else made my point why remote operations are just fine. What
I'm curious how the malicious interference was this year. I operated at K5NA this year. I had a major problem around 14.281 this year. I was sucked into a conversation with a station who would not us
I like alka seltzer morning relief. Nice kick of caffeine when I wake up. Rich - N5ZC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.co
W9SZ hit the nail on the head. What I have a problem with is a person saying "using the internet is not ham radio" when in actuality I'm using rf to make the contact with other stations. I've simply
Hi Dave: I don't think it will work. The hexacopter runs on batteries (lithium polymer) and flight times will be relatively short in the 10 to 20 minute range, probably shorter due to the weight of a
Hmmm. Your arguments don't fly this time (or for most other times now that I think about it). The callsign is a part of the exchange and must be sent. If you really did understand the heritage of thi
Paul: Whats your opinion on remote control operation? Rich - N5ZC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman