Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rob@cboh.org: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Ameritron (et. al.) filament voltages (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:29:54 -0500
I've noticed the same here with an AL-80B: On 240V, the filament voltage runs >5.5V on a 3-500Z (nominally a 5V tube). I spoke with Ameritron on the phone about the issue and their tech told me that
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00401.html (8,185 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Ameritron (et. al.) filament voltages (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:24:34 -0500
Hi Alek, Thanks for the response. Personally, I agree with you that it is better to keep the filament voltages in check for a number of reasons. However, here's a pointer to a post (from this list) t
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00412.html (10,104 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Fw: Good amp to buy /amp notes (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:35:49 -0500
I do feed the ALC output of my AL-80B back to the exciter. The 80B has an ALC sensitivity adjustment on the front panel, so I can somewhat control the PO of the exciter from the amp. However, it is i
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00577.html (10,425 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Fw: Good amp to buy /amp notes (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 01:54:33 -0500
Take a look at the Kenwood TS-430S, a rig that was marketed as late as the mid-1980s: It has a carrier control, allowing the power level to be controlled for CW ops and partially for AM, but the only
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00645.html (8,479 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Fw: Good amp to buy /amp notes (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:33:15 -0500
MIC GAIN control to limit PEP output power to a desired value. The reason is that there is no feedback involved with the MIC GAIN setting -- it just sets a given level of audio amplification -- and a
/archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00037.html (9,120 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Eimac bulletins now on http://w1rt.us/eimac/eimacxx.pdf (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:05:24 -0500
Or just go to: http://w1rt.us/eimac/ and take it from there -- it's easier. Rob / KD8WK _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
/archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00671.html (11,612 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:33:32 -0500
I am reminded of an exchange between Neils Bohr and a friend. The friend had just discovered a horseshoe nailed above Bohr's door and asked why it was there. "It's supposed to bring good luck", said
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00187.html (12,280 bytes)

8. [Amps] Are exciter RF delays to prevent hot keying cataloged anywhere? (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:36:04 -0400
I know most rigs employ a delay of some milliseconds between the time when their amp relay closes and RF transmission begins in order to prevent hot keying problems. On some, this is even an adjustab
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00358.html (7,661 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Are exciter RF delays to prevent hot keying cataloged anywhere? (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:31:24 -0400
Thanks to all -- Larry, James and Jim; hope I haven't left anyone out -- who responded to my query about exciter delays. I've squirreled away your emails for future reference. Larry, it looks like yo
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00366.html (7,578 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] How much C in PS is too much ? (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:43:27 -0400
I am reminded of the company some years back that marketed "45 Watt CB Radios". Eventually, the FCC caught wind of this and inquired about their enterprise. It turns out they had beefed up the audio
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00504.html (8,122 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Good engineering...More Car Computer Horror Stories (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:40:15 -0400
Interesting. I've heard that similar phenomena (and worse) occurred with regularity back when the VOA was running lots of power from their transmitters near Cincinnati, and I had a car once that lit
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00828.html (9,209 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] 160m mosfet linear amplifier problem with ferrite cores (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:11:01 -0400
When I was experimenting with common mode chokes on 160m and 80m, I tried type 77 toroids, and although they worked quite well, they overheated very easily. Type 43 toroids, although spec-wise seemin
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00538.html (10,280 bytes)

13. [Amps] 2000Vct 1.5KVA Toroid Tube Transmitter Amp Transformer (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:41:11 -0400
Speaking of toroid cores and what you can do with them, what are people's opinion of the following: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=370270095030 Rob _______________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00539.html (6,824 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] 4CX250B Ratings in Dentron Clipperton V (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 17:00:15 -0400
Never having had a tetrode amp, I feel compelled to ask: Should you always tune such an amp for a peak reading (within the acceptable range for screen current) and not add a tad bit of loading for li
/archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00305.html (9,715 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] Tower Climber (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:02:36 -0400
For those who've thus far missed seeing it: http://video.yahoo.com/watch/8244494?fr=yvmtf _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00358.html (7,321 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:58:53 -0500
Hmm. So, do you deduct those points earned from everyone who worked them, too? Inquiring minds want to know. Rob / KD8WK _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contest
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00110.html (9,655 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] AL-82a Problem (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:38:48 -0500
On what? The AL-82, or the AL-80b? _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2010-12/msg00031.html (7,334 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] 3-1000 Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 01:32:48 -0400
Just curious: I know you say the tube was not in the water, but would an unenergized glass tube be damaged from being submerged in a flood for a day or two? I would think it would not be, although I
/archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00043.html (8,853 bytes)

19. [Amps] Picture tubes (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:07:14 -0400
I have a friend who removed a rather large picture tube from a console once. I think it was around 27" diagonally. He wanted to dispose of the tube and electronics and re-use the cabinet. The tube wa
/archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00058.html (10,386 bytes)

20. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Front Panel Material? (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 15:43:51 -0500
I'm not sure what metal it is (or if it is even metal), but a magnet won't stick to the front panel of my AL-80B, so it isn't steel. FWIW, the top/side cover and back are aluminum, but the screws are
/archives//html/Amps/2011-11/msg00041.html (6,998 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu