- 1. RE: Topband: (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert McGwier" <rwmcgwier@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 00:55:01 -0000
- This is at best a qualitative result. The actual topography drastically impacts the fresnel lensing effects of ground on propagation. It is to be used with caution. Without knowing the actual conduct
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00092.html (8,517 bytes)
- 2. RE: Topband: Key Clicks (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert McGwier" <rwmcgwier@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 23:50:40 -0000
- AMEN. At W2GD, the key clicks got so bad during my hour in the European sunrise that I thought Crovelli was going to throw me out of the shack I did so much complaining. Please save my seat at W2GD a
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00036.html (7,678 bytes)
- 3. RE: Topband: The answer is $$$$ (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert McGwier" <rwmcgwier@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 02:34:59 -0000
- That is not what Tom suggested. What he said was that Yaesu, knowing of the problem through SEVERAL generations of bloody radios has done nothing about fixing the design, even when the fix was a triv
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00049.html (8,154 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: BDR redux (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert McGwier" <rwmcgwier@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 15:32:29 -0000
- Tom: I am attempting to capture good AGC action in the next release of the SDR-1000 software (which is a major rework, using different tools, libraries, programming style and VB is gone forever and u
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00123.html (10,287 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: AGC (and now other work) (score: 1)
- Author: rwmcgwier@comcast.net
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:01:43 +0000
- Thanks to Oleg, Tom, and others for all these details on their AGC work. It has been very informative. For the software defined receiver, I am working on three different things right at the moment in
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00165.html (17,693 bytes)
- 6. Re: Topband: AGC (and now other work) (score: 1)
- Author: rwmcgwier@comcast.net
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:08:25 +0000
- Doug: Thank you for your note. I am having as much fun in amateur radio now as I have ever had. I hope my fun turns out to be useful. The SDR-1000 is a beautiful thing and SDR technology is here to s
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00172.html (9,861 bytes)
- 7. Topband: Re: Element grounding (score: 1)
- Author: rwmcgwier@comcast.net
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 00:50:16 +0000
- I retract my elements everytime I leave the station. It house ZERO tape outside of the housing when this done. However, the passive 6 meter elements remain. Bob N4HY _________________________________
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00058.html (6,393 bytes)
- 8. RE: Topband: radial layout and pattern skew (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert McGwier" <rwmcgwier@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 13:40:10 -0000
- EZNEC 3 is not capable of doing the necessary ground model mathematics to adequately model your antenna. EZNEC Pro/4 shows much less variation than you are showing. If the woods are dense, can't you
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-09/msg00032.html (9,405 bytes)
- 9. RE: Topband: Receivers (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert McGwier" <rwmcgwier@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 15:04:06 -0000
- There is little doubt that from the time of the introduction of the IC-746 through the IC-756 Pro II there was ONE acceptable receiver introduced by ICOM. It was the IC-746. I have no idea how Icom c
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00130.html (12,761 bytes)
- 10. FW: Topband: buried radial problems. (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert McGwier" <rwmcgwier@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:13:58 -0000
- Enzo: Someone has already said, but it does bear repeating: when using elevated radials, they have to be part of the resonant system, and you will need radials cut for 160, 80, 40 or some system to b
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00284.html (8,449 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu