Mail Archive Search: <+from:sawyered@earthlink.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:sawyered@earthlink.net: 136 ]

Total 136 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU R1 proposals (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:14:50 -0500; Since the most popular Ham Radio Activity around the world is contesting, I would like to propose that we EXPAND the contest activity to all of the HF Bands. Why should 30,000 hams be constrained wit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00058.html (8,398 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op + Pit Crew (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 05:29:00 -0400; Personally, I don't even have a problem with the full time advisor...just have him or her keep their hands off the dial, computer, key, and PTT switch. Ed N1UR _______________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00061.html (7,138 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:21:17 -0400; Personally, it doesn't bother me if someone wants to come and observe me contesting. It would surprise me if my station was deemed "important enough" for someone to take their time off of actually co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00255.html (10,585 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Field Day Comments (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:46:38 -0400; I continue to be impressed by the Field Day activity that occurs every year on the bands. It truly shows ham radio is alive and well to witness it on the air. I was on for approximately 18 hours and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00435.html (8,687 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Categories, Participation and Competition (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:10:38 -0400; Chris, Its plenty of interest. That wasn't my point. The point is for all of the people on this reflector who are interested in these categories to join in and COMPETITIVELY contest in the 12 and 24; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00306.html (11,013 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Categories, Participation and Competition (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:55:35 -0400; None...I don't like many of those contest. But I am not advocating short contest windows. I enjoy the 36 and 48 hour contests. Ed N1UR How many shortened-time contests did you operate in 2008 Ed? I d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00303.html (10,472 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Categories, Participation and Competition (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:45:25 -0400; I must say that for years, I have read in this reflector the discussion of the "multitudes" of "casual contesters" that would become serious with smaller competitive time requirements. Yet IARU (24 h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00293.html (10,150 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Control Operator (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:19:20 -0400 (GMT-04:00); "This prohibition does not apply to a message for any third party who is eligible to be a control operator of the station." This is widely interpretted across the contesting community to mean that if; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00149.html (7,410 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] IC-7200 for travel contesting (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:51:09 -0400; Personally, I find an FT897 with 250 hz CW filter and a very lightweight manual tuner and extreamly lightweight and cost effective package. Worked over 6000 QSOs from Spratly last year using it with; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00359.html (7,996 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ethics (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 06:01:31 -0400; You must be assuming that the log shows frequency data. In my case, I am using older software that logs all 20M QSOs as 14000. In general, I disagree with the responsibility of the receiving station; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00077.html (9,420 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Operating Time (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:31:33 -0400; I sure hope that all of the people commenting on the on and off times calculations for the WPX contest actually GET ON AND OPERATE the contest. Ed N1UR _______________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00376.html (6,644 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx ssb spotting report (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:00:40 -0400; N4ZR said: "In the last case, a whopping Multi-two score, a majority of the alleged self-spots were actually cheerleading by a relative of one of the ops." I hope your not implying that this makes it; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00267.html (8,874 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] An Examination of K1TTT's Reports (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:47:57 -0400; I could not disagree more with KV1Y's post. I for one think the service that David K1TTT provides to the contesting community is enormous and greatly appreciated. The number of people around the worl; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00265.html (9,131 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Russian DX Contest Log Checking (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:12:54 -0400; I have never operated the RDXC and am now certain that I will not do so seriously after reading this "shocking" information about the scoring and penalties. I do know that when I have tuned around an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00183.html (9,780 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating Ethics for Multi-Op contest (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:03:41 -0400; "I've had SSTV'ers try to run me from any freq within 10 KHZ of 14.230. I really doubt, knowing the claiber of ops down there last week, that they would stay within a couple Kc of 14.230. I think 14.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00180.html (8,559 bytes)
16. [CQ-Contest] Another Year of SS Disections (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:14:27 -0500; It always amazes me. No other contest generates more back and forth and beating dead horses than SS. I think it is just about the only contest some of this group does and then they have a year to tal; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00327.html (7,592 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Does anyone prefer virtual contests to real ones? (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:37:31 -0400; You can't be serious Barry. Is it more fun to sit in an arcade game and pretend to drive a Ferrari at 180 or to actually sit in one and "take 'r arounf the track" even though you can only do it at 14; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00164.html (7,947 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:49:12 -0400; Does anyone want to argue that using a "Code Reader" is NOT assistance. I can think of no greater poster child for DEFINING Assistance than a code reader. Lets just put an end to the endless debate b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00485.html (9,469 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - A long way to go? (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:52:51 -0400; I read with great interest Dave's post on a newbie skimmer experience having not tried or heard it myself. One thing that I wanted to comment on was the packet experience vs finding mults. As a Low P; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00318.html (8,032 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:04:27 -0400; My experience in discussions with young people has been the opposite of the "CW decoding will keep CW alive longer" position. CW is about the worst data mode imaginable. PSK31 is waaaaaay better as a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00444.html (7,364 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]