Mail Archive Search: <+from:sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: RE: New concept for Lowband DX Receiving (score: 1): Author: sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington); Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 12:33:51 -0500; Note that the null off the back of any such vertically polarized array will be very sensitive to re-radiation from other nearby vertical conductors, like towers and transmitting verticals. In many in; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00081.html (7,005 bytes)
2. TopBand: Re: Small Receiving Loops (score: 1): Author: sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington); Date: Mon, 05 Jan 1998 12:43:58 -0500; There's a short article on matching small receiving loops in Technical Correspondence in QST Sept. 1995. I wrote another version of that article for the SMC newsletter, which includes some informatio; /archives//html/Topband/1998-01/msg00052.html (6,876 bytes)
3. TopBand: Re: Small Receiving Loops (score: 1): Author: sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington); Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 15:52:09 -0500; K6ZZ asks: The lower capacitance allows you to resonate a larger loop, though this isn't a problem with a 5 foot/side loop on 160. RG-62 has even less capacitance than 75 Ohm foam, and a 5 foot squar; /archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00400.html (7,063 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]