Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:sebdesn@ecentral.com: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: The disappearing tower - final chapter? (score: 1)
Author: sebdesn@ecentral.com (sebdesn)
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 16:24:51 -0700
. Please accept my appologies in advance if this appears to be a "smart --" comment,But.... Might there be a hint in these two statements???? Bud W0HG
/archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00131.html (6,953 bytes)

2. Topband: chicken wire ground screen (score: 1)
Author: sebdesn@ecentral.com (sebdesn)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 16:08:25 -0600
My apologies on this - the search capability for Ham radio magazine and NCJ is not yet available to members, just internally to ARRL. It needs some further checking before being released. -- Tom Try
/archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00011.html (7,410 bytes)

3. Topband: salt the ground? (score: 1)
Author: sebdesn@ecentral.com (sebdesn)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:35:47 -0600
My only comment is that you had better hope the EPA is not a subscriber to this list. I'm sure these guys would run over each other to see your salt lick. Just before they ripped you a "new one". Bud
/archives//html/Topband/2002-07/msg00098.html (8,012 bytes)

4. Topband: 3/8 Wavelength Inverted-L (score: 1)
Author: sebdesn@ecentral.com (S Schieving)
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 17:15:41 -0600
I don't remember the exact numbers but when I modeled the 3/8 vs. the 1/8 (or so),that I now use, the 1/8 was better (including loading losses). And ,yes the 3/8 is very easy to match w/ the series v
/archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00130.html (6,925 bytes)

5. Topband: Power Coupling on 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: sebdesn@ecentral.com (S Schieving)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 17:24:54 -0600
< Sometimes, close-in, IT'S the disaster! _I think the take off angle is everything..During one of the contests this season I was absoultly unable to work a couple of LOUD (30 over)Texas stations usi
/archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00086.html (7,162 bytes)

6. Topband: EZNec Fool (score: 1)
Author: sebdesn@ecentral.com (S Schieving)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:33:26 -0700
,I guess I can see the day where someone applies the JFET follower active ,antenna tuner/preamp to the feed points, then uses a non-metallic fiber ,optic cable for the lead-in. That is a great idea..
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00181.html (6,672 bytes)

7. Topband: Re Topband ;a word from the Master W1BB (score: 1)
Author: sebdesn@ecentral.com (Schieving)
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:39:51 -0700
Tom, How do you get meaningful measurements with strong broadcast voltages present on the antenna??? This is very timely to my situation as I am in the process of putting 600 sq ft of chicken wire g
/archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00010.html (7,145 bytes)

8. Topband: Elevating radials (score: 1)
Author: sebdesn@ecentral.com (S Schieving)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:12:56 -0600
<What will happen to a ground mounted vertical that have radials slooping upwards 20 feet at 45 ><deg and the rest horisontal. Will the radials shorten the radiating part of the vertical ? Ken I have
/archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00078.html (7,057 bytes)

9. Topband: Bandplan (score: 1)
Author: sebdesn@ecentral.com (Schieving)
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:21:06 -0600
Topbanders, It's my understanding that the FCC came down on the phone guys for intentional interference. The question posed to them was, "what was the reason they were there doing that", not "why wer
/archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00149.html (6,589 bytes)

10. Topband: screen type ground systems (score: 1)
Author: sebdesn@ecentral.com (Schieving)
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 19:49:26 -0600
Topbanders.. Whilst rummaging thru some stuff, I found an article by Rob Sherwood...It was a test of ground screens...I guess they weren't really screens but chicken wire in various configurations. I
/archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00115.html (7,489 bytes)

11. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: sebdesn@ecentral.com (Schieving)
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 22:40:39 -0600
Topbanders, Thanks for all the replies on the ground screen query... Having to much time, I used EZNEC 3.0 and attempted to model the various possibilities that I can put up here in the city. Given a
/archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00140.html (8,152 bytes)

12. Topband: Drooping top hats-(or to droop or not to droop,if you can help it) (score: 1)
Author: sebdesn@ecentral.com (Schieving)
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:36:11 -0600
Topbanders I have been reading the thread about the drooping with much interest... I am getting ready for some antenna work myself. Using eznec 3.0 I modeled a 30 ft vertical over 4, 1/4 wl radials.
/archives//html/Topband/2001-08/msg00138.html (7,557 bytes)

13. Topband: Droop.... (score: 1)
Author: sebdesn@ecentral.com (Schieving)
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 15:39:10 -0600
TBr's While looking for a usable number for the R in R +-jx.I found these papers. (He is using .34% of the +reactance in ohms for a Q of 300)so the R s/b 1.4 and 2.8 instead of the 2 and 4 ohms I use
/archives//html/Topband/2001-08/msg00139.html (6,649 bytes)

14. Topband: Topload (score: 1)
Author: sebdesn@ecentral.com (Schieving)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:09:41 -0600
Ulli I think the top hat should be as large as possible, however if it is not possible to top load to nearly resonance ,you do what you can. As example on a 30ft ant, a hat with 4 108" ss whips in a
/archives//html/Topband/2001-08/msg00158.html (6,429 bytes)

15. Topband: W1AW 160 Freq (score: 1)
Author: "sebdesn" <sebdesn@ecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:31:57 -0600
Got this from ARRL today. Bud Schieving W&Oslash;HG ARLB060 W1AW to shift 160-meter transmission frequency Starting Monday, September 29, W1AW will shift its 160-meter code practice and bulletin tran
/archives//html/Topband/2003-09/msg00080.html (7,041 bytes)

16. RE: Topband: Drake repair (score: 1)
Author: "sebdesn" <sebdesn@ecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:46:44 -0700
Re John Kriner: Over the years have talked to him many times while at Drake.Great guy. All I have ever heard of him and his current service is first cabin. Bud Schieving W&Oslash;HG _________________
/archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00065.html (7,239 bytes)

17. RE: Topband: Local noise environment (score: 1)
Author: "sebdesn" <sebdesn@ecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:16:26 -0700
I've been observed suspiciously by locals who thought I I had a woman report me to the cops because I was driving around with a rather large 160m antenna on the car. She was sure I was plotting somet
/archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00270.html (8,321 bytes)

18. RE: Topband: Re: 160m Ant on 80m? (score: 1)
Author: "sebdesn" <sebdesn@ecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:34:49 -0600
My 40m hustler type antenna works perfect on 6m as the mast below the loading coil is 1/4w on 6m and the coil acts as a trap as you suggested... Bud Schieving W&Oslash;HG ___________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00120.html (7,253 bytes)

19. RE: Topband: Top band Civil war of the 1960s and 70s. (score: 1)
Author: "sebdesn" <sebdesn@ecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 19:16:50 -0600
In the real early 70's there was a NTS traffic net on phone and cw that I checked into on 1818 with my Johnson Ranger on am, loaded into the rain gutters on the house.(damn those rf burns) As time w
/archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00165.html (8,240 bytes)

20. RE: Topband: High pass Filters (score: 1)
Author: "sebdesn" <sebdesn@ecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:13:46 -0700
I have something similar, two stations one 1550 one 1690 mix and dump on 1830. Only they have a common transmitter/antenna and its probably mixing in the station electronics. Station is only 2 miles
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00232.html (7,560 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu