Mail Archive Search: <+from:sm2cew@telia.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:sm2cew@telia.com: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] K2RIW Amps (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:36:59 +0100; I don't believe it... When we debated DAF amps and were telling that nearby stations reported no splatter this was by NO means a way to prove acceptable IMD according to Measures. Now he has decided; /archives//html/Amps/2001-02/msg00358.html (8,081 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Clipperton L amplifier (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 18:49:30 +0100; When rebuilding the screen supply for my amp I suddenly developed arcing BIG time in the tank circuit something that had never happened before. Screening the rectifiers and bypassing the cable feedin; /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00501.html (9,570 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Clipperton L amplifier (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 18:05:48 +0100; Tom, I have no idea where the amp was oscillating. The tube is good for operation at 250MHz+ so VHF oscillation is surely possible but it might just as well have been HF. Screening and proper bypassi; /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00527.html (10,292 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Re: G2DAF Amps Circuit (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 19:10:52 +0200; Rich, Gimme five minutes in a contest and I will spot 50 stations for you who run the magnificent GG circuit in their amplifiers and still transmit feculence to the degree that you wanna puke. And we; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00538.html (10,081 bytes)
5. [AMPS] G2DAF Circuit (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 21:24:20 +0200; Gents, I have to say that Colin and Marv seems to be the most open minded people on this reflector at the moment. At least they try to understand what is going on and even suggest some improvements.; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00586.html (11,076 bytes)
6. [AMPS] G2DAF Circuit (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:59:38 +0200; Just as an information about my DAF amp, the screen voltage is derived by a voltage quadrupler circuit, not a voltage doubler. Screen voltage on peaks at maximum screen current is around 650 volts, a; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00615.html (11,553 bytes)
7. SV: [AMPS] G2DAF Circuit (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 06:48:38 +0200; I would like to add the following statement from a good friend of mine: "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." - Albert Einstein Albert was right, look at the; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00624.html (9,455 bytes)
8. SV: [AMPS] G2DAF Circuit (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 10:31:59 +0200; Tom, I do get your point regarding the circuit but the point we are trying to make is that despite the fact that you and others try to tell us it doesn't work it does work. WITH respectable IMD, the; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00626.html (11,820 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 09:39:34 +0200; Paul, I am perfectly comfortable with my QBL 5-3500 G2DAF amp without any parasitic suppressor. It runs all bands, stable as a rock. No special arrangements except the screen is bypassed with a PTFE; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00194.html (10,260 bytes)
10. [AMPS] (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 11:15:05 +0200; 350 - you 1 kW Why not dare the DAF configuration for the 4-125's ?? !! :-)) Ciao, Peter SM2CEW -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative reque; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00169.html (7,700 bytes)
11. [AMPS] Amateur amps on 11 meters (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:18:23 +0200; Excuse me gents, but you US guys seem to be obsessed with CB'ers running excessive power and how to prevent that! Focus on cleaning up the HAM bands instead and leave the enforcement of CB rules to t; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00495.html (8,567 bytes)
12. [AMPS] CBers and POWER (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:35:51 +0200; And there was fire.... Interesting debate fellows. Some want to jail CB'ers (I mean really....come on..!!), some think CB'ers are better than us. Fortunately most people, like myself, are just intere; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00535.html (9,259 bytes)
13. [AMPS] ssr's in qro amps (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 05:31:33 +0200; Larry, I see absolutely no reason for this. It will only make things more complicated, and serves no purpose. 220V AC (Europe) is just as lethal as HV and we find that in all power supplies in the sh; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00392.html (11,323 bytes)
14. [AMPS] ssr's in qro amps (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 06:55:12 +0200; Larry, everything seems to be black OR white in your world. I am not accusing you of being DAFt, nor am I a god-like creature despite the fact I run a DAF amp. The point me and others were trying to; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00432.html (10,305 bytes)
15. [AMPS] ssr's in qro amps (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 08:47:59 +0200; Larry, for me it was because of your statement: "In this ham shack I have a rule: There will be NO high voltage present anywhere during receive mode. Period. Non-negotiable. End of discussion." You c; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00462.html (10,159 bytes)
16. [AMPS] ssr's in qro amps (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 17:52:08 +0200; I am both of these things Dave. Read my message again and try to focus on what is written, without your personal bias. Then it will be clear to you too what I mean. Perhaps you have ESP? Nope... Nope; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00480.html (9,040 bytes)
17. [AMPS] Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 12:05:56 +0100; Gents, Having spent a full weekend listening to a multitude of LOUSY signals in the ARRL SSB contest I am inclined to say that this reflector is on a mission impossible. Things are getting worse no m; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00218.html (8,454 bytes)
18. [AMPS] Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 12:53:59 +0100; Exactly, You've got the receiver without the famous SB, "Splatter Blanker" ! Haven't you heard of it ? or was it BS.. ? :-) /Peter/SM2CEW -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submiss; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00229.html (8,380 bytes)
19. [AMPS] Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 18:13:18 +0100; This is what puzzles me, but there is no doubt that "fine" radios can turn into mean machines if they are improperly adjusted. Many of the signals heard over the weekend had the sound to them that yo; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00251.html (10,045 bytes)
20. [AMPS] Re: Re: Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 15:51:40 +0100; Here we go again... As soon as we start talking about bad sounding transmitters the discussion drifts away and people start questioning the receivers instead ! What we heard during the contest was ge; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00373.html (10,401 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]