Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:sm6lrr@gmail.com: 202 ]

Total 202 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SAC 2009 - Two more weeks for Log Submission (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:12:34 +0400
Hello all participants of Scandinavian Activity Contest 2009! Two weeks remain until the deadline for Log Submission is reached. Please make sure that you visit www.sactest.net and upload your log. S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00139.html (8,979 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SAC Contest plaques (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:47:07 +0400
Hello Jorge! Yes, finally... we have managed to recover from the backlog of SSA plaques and awards. The SAC contest has a rotating scheme of organization and not always this is the most efficient way
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00317.html (9,013 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deep Vein Thrombosis from extended sitting (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 10:41:28 +0400
So my idea about using motorize control room tables with possibility to either sit and to stand as per the contest operators own wish is after all not that crazy? :) http://www.cgm.se/eng/business.ht
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00090.html (9,616 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results /Overspotting, and its impact (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:03:48 +0400
Hello all! Although I do not think that spotting in this WRTC influenced all that much on the top three positions, I would agree that excessive cheerleading spotting might have a negative influence o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00213.html (10,907 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results /Overspotting, and its impact (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:29:41 +0400
Well, that is also a valid comment Henk! Yes, the insertion into badcall would be a good variant. On the other hand, it would also be a good exercise for DXers to sometimes regain the capability of f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00230.html (10,087 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results /Overspotting, and its impact (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:06:23 +0400
Skimmers will be the standard tool at the time WRTC 2014 will take place, but the good thing about skimmers is that anyone can use them, and skimmers do not miss any calls... so this is a much more f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00241.html (13,107 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:16:36 +0400
Steve, you probably have a valid point in your comment... However, I must say that this year was my first "half-serious" attempt in WAE. As a European station with moderate equipment, QTCs really enh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00108.html (9,723 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real time scores for SAC CW this weekend (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:01:22 +0400
Hello David, We appreciate that a lot! During the last two years, the total amount of SAC logs was around 1800 compared to 1100-1200 logs between years 2000-2007. This means that the 52 year old SAC
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00117.html (8,828 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Very importan CQ SA SSB (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:50:01 +0400
Hello Muniz, I do not agree at all... Multipliers in the 52 years old Scandinavian Activity Contest are Scandinavian call areas, while this new Brazilian invention is using DXCC countries as multipli
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-10/msg00009.html (10,541 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Very importan CQ SA SSB (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 23:02:57 +0400
For a better understanding, I am intending to work the SAC SSB Contest as a Non-Scandinavian, and then our aim is to WORK ONLY Scandinavian stations, collecting call areas as multipliers. This means
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-10/msg00010.html (12,277 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Blind Mode for N1MM Bandmap (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:07:22 +0400
Well expressed Randy! I find it very strange that people always try to to twist the rules and find grey zones that are not mentioned, in order to still submit logs as Non-Assisted class but using tec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-10/msg00155.html (17,217 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Blind Mode for N1MM Bandmap (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:03:16 +0400
Hans (and others), My aim was not to stop any discussion what is allowed and what is not allowed... but anything dealing with clusters, skimmers and future inventions of "fully automatic devices that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-10/msg00166.html (12,777 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Complete CQWW CW 2009 results (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:45:15 +0300
Anyone that can assist with a link to the CQWW CW 2009 with the complete results of CQ WW 2009 CW Contest? On the www.cqww.com page, only Top Scores be found (or the complete scores are carefully hid
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00267.html (7,297 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] my secret weapon for this CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 05:59:49 +0300
Hey guys! Next time try some Russian Extreme Contesting :) During ARRL DX CW 2010 I got the insane (according to my wife at least) idea to work the contest from our uninsulated logcabin summer-house
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00464.html (10,274 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] a little more fairness? (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:56:56 +0300
If we start to change points for different zones, this will create a huge mess. See CQWW as a contest where you first of all challenge your own previous results by building better antennas, increasin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00152.html (12,612 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network (score: 1)
Author: <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:39:49 +0000
Hello! It is correctly assumed that RBN actively searches stations by looking for the letter combinations CQ and/or TEST. It means that highly efficent/skilled QRP and LP Search and Pounce stations c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00158.html (9,722 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted Skimmer Spots (score: 1)
Author: <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:42:51 +0000
Paul N0AH expressed things in a perfect way... Additional to his comments, I would like to remind some readers here that most radios actually have a VFO knob making possible to change the QRG a bit..
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00269.html (12,087 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:35:45 +0300
I noticed that the RDXC organizers have made a good effort to update the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ): http://www.rdxc.org/asp/pages/faq.asp Many questions regarding rule changes have been explai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00330.html (8,799 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:18:16 +0300
Hello all and thanks for different opinions! As we can see from the replies, obviously the question needs to be further clarified by RDXC Committee :) And to you Paul... The topic was written with th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00340.html (12,146 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:43:04 +0300
Paul, My last comment was not meant to say that contesting should not be taken seriously for those who really have the ambitions to win. However, open debate requires a bit of flexibility in admittin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00349.html (13,899 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu