Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:steve@karinya.net: 479 ]

Total 479 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] G5RV (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:11:11 +0000
Jerry, A picture paints a thousand words - take a look at Figure 9 here: http://www.vk1od.net/VSWR/displacement.htm it shows what I was trying to describe. Notice how unmatched loss (the red line) is
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00030.html (8,754 bytes)

122. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II / 263 VFO Question (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:03:03 +0000
Jerry's correct - you need the Pin 2 to Pin 6 jumper to enable the internal Corsair PTO. Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00198.html (8,391 bytes)

123. Re: [TenTec] Argosy I issues as well as Argosy II issues (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:04:35 +0000
Mike, At the risk of stating the obvious, the Argosy II fault would seem to be somewhere in the Tx chain that is unique to 80m. That doesn't leave a lot: Heterodyne Oscillator Xtal Bandpass filter PA
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00311.html (10,471 bytes)

124. Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:18:54 +0000
1) Tuners struggle most when they're dealing with low impedances at low frequencies. So, using an electrically short dipole on 160m and then dividing the impedance by 4 is a bad idea - much better to
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00332.html (9,155 bytes)

125. Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:02:05 +0000
I have a BT1500A and it's a fine piece of kit. However the L-network configuration means it has limited matching range on 160m. Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mail
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00346.html (9,172 bytes)

126. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II fluctuating Ic meter (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:11:43 +0000
That would be the first place I would look. I've also had problems with the Corsair II current metering; in each case it turned out to be nothing wrong with the signal chain - just the metering. Stev
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00356.html (8,747 bytes)

127. Re: [TenTec] RF Ground (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:13:39 +0100
Have you ever considered that providing a better local RF "ground" could make "RF in the shack" problems worse? Take the example of a half-wave dipole fed with coax that is a multiple of a half-wavel
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00061.html (9,134 bytes)

128. Re: [TenTec] RF Ground (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:31:28 +0100
Gary - not sure what point you are making. Say we did have the perfect RF Ground at the radio, impedance zero, voltage zero. That's when the common-mode current is highest and when the radiation from
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00084.html (9,927 bytes)

129. Re: [TenTec] Triton PTO kit same as Corsair II? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:51:21 +0100
Mike, I'll confirm that! I'm just looking at two un-opened rebuild kits, and neither contains the Drive Rod (90202). Nor did the two kits I've used previously. 73, Steve G3TXQ _______________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00296.html (9,048 bytes)

130. Re: [TenTec] Triton PTO kit same as Corsair II? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:30:56 +0100
Mike, Interesting - I wonder when you bought those, and if TT have changed their policy? Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00301.html (9,322 bytes)

131. Re: [TenTec] DDS VFO as remote VFO? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:34:24 +0100
As I understand it, the phase noise performance of a DDS is not as good as a well-designed PTO. Would a better solution be to use a "huff & puff" style stabiliser for the existing PTO? That way you g
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00325.html (7,964 bytes)

132. Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us... (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 11:54:48 +0100
Can I correct one common misunderstanding about low-pass L-network tuners. The two network configurations (shunt C at the output, or shunt C at the input) do not correspond to Hi-Z and Lo-Z loads, de
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00263.html (8,838 bytes)

133. Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us... (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:11:29 +0100
I'll say it again folks: these are misleading labels! A load of 2+j10 needs the **same** configuration as a load of 1000+j1000: shunt C across the load. A load of 2+j9 needs the **same** configuratio
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00275.html (9,270 bytes)

134. Re: [TenTec] Palstar tuner (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:25:04 +0100
That's not true of all baluns. The flux in the ferrite core of a 1:1 Guanella balun wound with coax depends on the common-mode current, not on the differential-mode current; so it's not directly rela
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00276.html (7,861 bytes)

135. Re: [TenTec] Palstar tuner (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:05:23 +0100
Jerry, Yes, it makes you wonder why tuner manufacturers persist in fitting *voltage* baluns when what we're usually trying to do is balance the *currents*! But I see some of them are learning, and in
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00278.html (8,131 bytes)

136. Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us... (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:11:28 +0100
Gary, The Hi-Z, Lo-Z labels are bad enough, but Palstar really screwed up on their BT1500A tuner - they labelled the configuration switch "High-Pass" "Low-Pass" !!!! Interesting that they reverted to
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00290.html (9,114 bytes)

137. Re: [TenTec] PTO rebuild question (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:21:11 +0100
Andrew, No, you don't grease the outside surface of the core! 73, Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-09/msg00121.html (8,141 bytes)

138. Re: [TenTec] Another PTO rebuild question: Where does second pin go? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:33:31 +0100
Andrew, I've rebuilt several Corsair II PTOs and I don't recall there being a second pin. Could it simply be a spare which TT ships because it's a part that is easily lost? 73, Steve G3TXQ __________
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-09/msg00128.html (9,336 bytes)

139. Re: [TenTec] Another PTO rebuild question: Where does second pin go? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:15:36 +0100
Andrew, Understood! If I recall correctly, the pin on the Corsair II rebuild kit was a very small "roll pin". If yours is the same, gripping it with pliers and rotating it as you push it in may help;
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-09/msg00134.html (8,657 bytes)

140. Re: [TenTec] Corsair AGC problem (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:42:08 +0000
Gil, I had that problem and it turned out to be a faulty front-panel switch. You can check by temporarily lifting connector #92 from the IF/AF Board - that should bring the AGC on in the FAST mode. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-01/msg00165.html (7,663 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu