Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:steve@karinya.net: 479 ]

Total 479 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [TenTec] Hallicrafters SX28 - was CorsairII notch potentiometer (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:32:03 +0000
Good question - but I'm not the owner. I'm simply checking it out for him. He owned an SX28 when he was a teenager in the 1960s - I think this is a "nostalgia trip" for him rather than a restoration
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00227.html (10,828 bytes)

222. Re: [TenTec] Hallicrafters SX28 - was CorsairII notch potentiometer (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:42:43 +0000
Yes - the ones in the RF/Mixer/Osc sub assembly are well nigh impossible to reach without a complete strip down. I'm not offering to re-cap it for him - it works well enough as it is for him to have
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00229.html (9,955 bytes)

223. Re: [TenTec] Antenna follow up- asked for help in January- need more help..... (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:18:52 +0000
Rick, I you use the T-match simulator at: http://fermi.la.asu.edu/w9cf/tuner/tuner.html you'll find that minimum tuner loss usually corresponds to minimum inductance. Tom (W8JI) has some interesting
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00267.html (11,419 bytes)

224. Re: [TenTec] Antenna follow up- asked for help in January- need more help..... (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:11:03 +0000
It's worth knowing that the ARRL TLW programme very significantly underestimates the loss of ladderline. I much prefer the free, and more accurate, calculator at: http://vk1od.net/calc/tl/tllc.php 73
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00289.html (10,213 bytes)

225. Re: [TenTec] KW 107 Supermatch (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:16:00 +0000
What Rick said, plus: there was a higher power version produced - the KW109. This quote from G3RZP on another forum: "The KW109 design is not well suited for really high power - say above 500 or 600
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00321.html (11,952 bytes)

226. [TenTec] Titan and Centurion amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:47:55 +0000
I'd love to get hold of a Titan amplifier - or possibly a Centurion - to complete my CorsairII, OmniVI, line-up. Is there anything I need to look out for on these amps - common faults, lack of replac
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00482.html (6,924 bytes)

227. Re: [TenTec] Corsair11 serial numbers (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:26:56 +0000
Gordon, The serial number on my CorsairII is 580-01861. I purchased it new from KW in October 1986. Of course, manufacture could have been some considerable time before it was delivered to KW - the U
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00488.html (8,600 bytes)

228. Re: [TenTec] Corsair11 serial numbers (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:02:15 +0000
Interesting! I have two Corsair IIs and both have serial numbers starting 580 Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contes
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00495.html (8,484 bytes)

229. Re: [TenTec] Titan and Centurion amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:28:06 +0000
Thanks Barry. I would want it to be the 425 to match the "cosmetics" of the CorsairII and OmniVI. Regards, Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@conte
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00524.html (9,532 bytes)

230. Re: [TenTec] Titan and Centurion amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:37:14 +0000
It has to be grey or it will offend me :) http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/shack/op.jpg 73, Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00529.html (10,134 bytes)

231. Re: [TenTec] Titan and Centurion amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:45:14 +0000
Dave, Yep - the colour of the LP-100 offends me! Out with the spray can, I guess :) The home-brew twin-meter SWR unit next to the LP-100 was an attempt to replicate the TT case style and colour - fai
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00533.html (9,892 bytes)

232. Re: [TenTec] Titan and Centurion amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:17:07 +0000
There you go, John - that's at least two of us in the world who prefer the grey :) Regards, Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http:
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00535.html (9,484 bytes)

233. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II VFO level? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:58:48 +0000
I measure 1.3v p/p from the PTO at the input to the xtal mixer board on my Corsair II. By the way, I replaced the PTO on one of my two Corsair IIs with the N4YG DDS board. That provides two VFO funct
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00204.html (8,561 bytes)

234. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II VFO level? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:25:03 +0000
I bought mine from him and fitted it last month. I made some simple modifications to mine which improved spurii levels significantly. I had multiple eMail exchanges with Joe telling him what I had do
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00206.html (7,855 bytes)

235. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II VFO level? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:46:06 +0000
Barry, You'd be amazed how much nicer the Corsair feels with the original tuning knob driving an encoder rather than the PTO. I even epoxied some steel nuts to the inside of the knob to give it extra
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00209.html (9,711 bytes)

236. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II VFO level? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:18:04 +0000
Barry, The tuning rate of Joe's DDS is velocity dependent - if you spin the dial fast it quickly goes from one end of the band to the other. At its slowest rate it is close to 1kHz for one complete t
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00215.html (9,559 bytes)

237. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II DDS VFO (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:59:28 +0000
Perry, I haven't tried it. If I get a chance over the next couple of days I'll do some tests. It would be nice to get some thorough testing done of Rx performance when equipped with the DDS, but I do
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00219.html (10,771 bytes)

238. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II DDS VFO (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:50:18 +0000
Greg, The DDS modification still uses the Corsair's "native" frequency readout circuitry, so setting accuracy is no better or worse than with the PTO. 73, Steve G3TXQ ________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00225.html (9,302 bytes)

239. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II DDS VFO (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:53:54 +0000
Readout accuracy is entirely dependent on the Corsair's "native" counter board; VFO frequency stability is entirely dependent on the DDS reference oscillator. What the DDS does *not* have is the 10kH
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00236.html (10,536 bytes)

240. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II DDS VFO (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:47:35 +0000
Perry, I took a quick look this morning. I keyed the Corsair at 30wpm, fast QSK, and 100W output into a dummy load. I tried 50kHz and 200kHz frequency splits. I listened to the signal on a monitor re
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00252.html (9,523 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu